Investigating plasma morphology at material boundaries under varying ambient pressures.

IF 6.1 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Talanta Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-24 DOI:10.1016/j.talanta.2025.128377
Megha Mohan, David Prochazka, Yi You, Jens Riedel, Igor Gornushkin, Ivana Ročňáková, Martin Papula, Pavel Pořízka, Jozef Kaiser
{"title":"Investigating plasma morphology at material boundaries under varying ambient pressures.","authors":"Megha Mohan, David Prochazka, Yi You, Jens Riedel, Igor Gornushkin, Ivana Ročňáková, Martin Papula, Pavel Pořízka, Jozef Kaiser","doi":"10.1016/j.talanta.2025.128377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) is a widely used technique for elemental analysis. The analysis of the obtained LIBS spectra generally assumes plasma homogeneity. However, using focused laser beams for interrogation, LIBS probes materials on the microscale and is, thus, prone to artefacts from sample heterogeneities on the micrometre scale. An ablation at a material boundary of two matrices may result in a significant inhomogeneity in the plasma plume, which can severely impact the accuracy of quantitative analysis. Since this propagation of the surface morphology into the plasma plume is driven by the plasma expansion, its final impact is strongly pressure dependent. This study examines the influence of varying ambient pressures (7-1000 mbar) on plasma morphology, spectral characteristics, and key plasma properties such as electron number density at a well-defined Cu-Sn boundary, in comparison with the results obtained using homogeneous alloys. Several approaches of plasma imaging with bandpass filters, spectroscopy, and Radon transform-based 3D reconstruction were employed to analyse elemental distribution, signal-to-noise (SNR) and signal-to-background (SBR) ratios, as well as electron number densities. The 3D reconstructions revealed a pronounced plasma asymmetry for the ablation at the material boundary, in contrast to the near-axial symmetry observed for the ablation of homogeneous alloys. At lower pressures, this distinct elemental separation in plasma persisted, while higher pressures led to an increased collisional mixing and homogenization. SNR and SBR were consistently lower for ablation at the boundary compared to homogeneous samples. These findings highlight how boundary ablation contributes to plasma inhomogeneities in LIBS analysis of heterogeneous materials and emphasize the need to account for these effects when using LIBS for elemental mapping of fine heterogeneous structures.</p>","PeriodicalId":435,"journal":{"name":"Talanta","volume":"295 ","pages":"128377"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Talanta","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2025.128377","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) is a widely used technique for elemental analysis. The analysis of the obtained LIBS spectra generally assumes plasma homogeneity. However, using focused laser beams for interrogation, LIBS probes materials on the microscale and is, thus, prone to artefacts from sample heterogeneities on the micrometre scale. An ablation at a material boundary of two matrices may result in a significant inhomogeneity in the plasma plume, which can severely impact the accuracy of quantitative analysis. Since this propagation of the surface morphology into the plasma plume is driven by the plasma expansion, its final impact is strongly pressure dependent. This study examines the influence of varying ambient pressures (7-1000 mbar) on plasma morphology, spectral characteristics, and key plasma properties such as electron number density at a well-defined Cu-Sn boundary, in comparison with the results obtained using homogeneous alloys. Several approaches of plasma imaging with bandpass filters, spectroscopy, and Radon transform-based 3D reconstruction were employed to analyse elemental distribution, signal-to-noise (SNR) and signal-to-background (SBR) ratios, as well as electron number densities. The 3D reconstructions revealed a pronounced plasma asymmetry for the ablation at the material boundary, in contrast to the near-axial symmetry observed for the ablation of homogeneous alloys. At lower pressures, this distinct elemental separation in plasma persisted, while higher pressures led to an increased collisional mixing and homogenization. SNR and SBR were consistently lower for ablation at the boundary compared to homogeneous samples. These findings highlight how boundary ablation contributes to plasma inhomogeneities in LIBS analysis of heterogeneous materials and emphasize the need to account for these effects when using LIBS for elemental mapping of fine heterogeneous structures.

研究在不同环境压力下材料边界处的等离子体形态。
激光诱导击穿光谱(LIBS)是一种广泛应用于元素分析的技术。所得LIBS光谱的分析通常假定等离子体均匀性。然而,使用聚焦激光束进行询问,LIBS在微观尺度上探测材料,因此,在微米尺度上容易受到样品异质性的影响。在两个基体的材料边界处的烧蚀可能导致等离子体羽流的显著不均匀性,这将严重影响定量分析的准确性。由于表面形态在等离子体羽流中的传播是由等离子体膨胀驱动的,因此其最终影响与压力密切相关。本研究考察了不同环境压力(7-1000毫巴)对等离子体形态、光谱特征和关键等离子体性能的影响,如在明确定义的Cu-Sn边界处的电子数密度,并与使用均质合金获得的结果进行了比较。采用几种等离子体成像方法,包括带通滤波器、光谱和基于Radon变换的三维重建,分析元素分布、信噪比(SNR)和信背景比(SBR)以及电子数密度。三维重建显示,在材料边界处的烧蚀具有明显的等离子体不对称性,而均匀合金的烧蚀具有近轴对称性。在较低的压力下,等离子体中这种明显的元素分离持续存在,而较高的压力导致碰撞混合和均质化的增加。与均匀样品相比,在边界处烧蚀的信噪比和SBR始终较低。这些发现强调了在非均质材料的LIBS分析中,边界烧蚀是如何导致等离子体不均匀性的,并强调了在使用LIBS进行精细非均质结构元素映射时需要考虑这些影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Talanta
Talanta 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
4.90%
发文量
861
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: Talanta provides a forum for the publication of original research papers, short communications, and critical reviews in all branches of pure and applied analytical chemistry. Papers are evaluated based on established guidelines, including the fundamental nature of the study, scientific novelty, substantial improvement or advantage over existing technology or methods, and demonstrated analytical applicability. Original research papers on fundamental studies, and on novel sensor and instrumentation developments, are encouraged. Novel or improved applications in areas such as clinical and biological chemistry, environmental analysis, geochemistry, materials science and engineering, and analytical platforms for omics development are welcome. Analytical performance of methods should be determined, including interference and matrix effects, and methods should be validated by comparison with a standard method, or analysis of a certified reference material. Simple spiking recoveries may not be sufficient. The developed method should especially comprise information on selectivity, sensitivity, detection limits, accuracy, and reliability. However, applying official validation or robustness studies to a routine method or technique does not necessarily constitute novelty. Proper statistical treatment of the data should be provided. Relevant literature should be cited, including related publications by the authors, and authors should discuss how their proposed methodology compares with previously reported methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信