Registered Dietitian Nutritionist Consultation Is Associated With Improvement in Nutritional Status in Chronically Ill Children: A Retrospective, Cohort Study
Mary Beth Feuling MS, RD , Julia Hilbrands MS, MPH, RD, CSP , Kyndal Hettich MS, RD-AP , Jessica Kopesky MS, RD , Nicole Martin RD, CSP , Regina McCarthy MS, RD , Kristen Osinski MS , Rebecca Pipkorn RD , Amber Smith MBA , Rodney A. Sparapani PhD , Bi Q. Teng MS , Praveen S. Goday MBBS, FAAP
{"title":"Registered Dietitian Nutritionist Consultation Is Associated With Improvement in Nutritional Status in Chronically Ill Children: A Retrospective, Cohort Study","authors":"Mary Beth Feuling MS, RD , Julia Hilbrands MS, MPH, RD, CSP , Kyndal Hettich MS, RD-AP , Jessica Kopesky MS, RD , Nicole Martin RD, CSP , Regina McCarthy MS, RD , Kristen Osinski MS , Rebecca Pipkorn RD , Amber Smith MBA , Rodney A. Sparapani PhD , Bi Q. Teng MS , Praveen S. Goday MBBS, FAAP","doi":"10.1016/j.jand.2025.05.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The influence of care provided by a registered dietitian nutritionist (RDN) to malnourished children is not well described.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare nutrition outcomes of malnourished, chronically ill children with and without RDN involvement in outpatient care.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div><span>Retrospective cohort study of malnourished children who had ≥1 complex chronic condition with a follow-up period of at least 2 years during which improvement in body mass index-for-age </span><em>z</em> score (BMIz) and clinical outcomes were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Chronically ill children initially aged 2 to 5 years with malnutrition were divided into those seen (RDN group) or not seen (non-RDN group) by an RDN in an outpatient setting 60 days from the nadir BMIz. Of 841 patients, 240 (28.5%) were in the RDN group vs 601 patients (71.5%) in the non-RDN group.</div></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><div>Changes in BMIz at 6 months and 2 years and clinical outcomes (number of hospitalizations, total hospital days, and total procedure days) between 6 months and 2 years.</div></div><div><h3>Statistical analyses performed</h3><div>Group differences were tested using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Pearson χ<sup>2</sup> test. A regression mixed model analysis of the BMIz outcome estimating the RDN group effect while adjusting for confounders was performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients in the RDN group had worse median BMIz at baseline (–2.08) vs the non-RDN group (–1.80) (<em>P</em> = .0002) and more chronic illnesses throughout the study period. BMIz progressed in both groups, although improvements in BMIz were better in the RDN group (all <em>P</em> values < .05). The clinical outcomes were all worse in the RDN group (<em>P</em> < .0001). The regression mixed model found a 0.14 BMIz improvement for the RDN group (<em>P</em> = .0057).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite being more malnourished and sicker overall, an RDN visit for chronically ill, malnourished children was associated with an improvement in BMIz but not with other clinical outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":379,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":"125 11","pages":"Pages 1730-1735.e3"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212267225001893","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The influence of care provided by a registered dietitian nutritionist (RDN) to malnourished children is not well described.
Objective
To compare nutrition outcomes of malnourished, chronically ill children with and without RDN involvement in outpatient care.
Design
Retrospective cohort study of malnourished children who had ≥1 complex chronic condition with a follow-up period of at least 2 years during which improvement in body mass index-for-age z score (BMIz) and clinical outcomes were assessed.
Participants
Chronically ill children initially aged 2 to 5 years with malnutrition were divided into those seen (RDN group) or not seen (non-RDN group) by an RDN in an outpatient setting 60 days from the nadir BMIz. Of 841 patients, 240 (28.5%) were in the RDN group vs 601 patients (71.5%) in the non-RDN group.
Main outcome measures
Changes in BMIz at 6 months and 2 years and clinical outcomes (number of hospitalizations, total hospital days, and total procedure days) between 6 months and 2 years.
Statistical analyses performed
Group differences were tested using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Pearson χ2 test. A regression mixed model analysis of the BMIz outcome estimating the RDN group effect while adjusting for confounders was performed.
Results
Patients in the RDN group had worse median BMIz at baseline (–2.08) vs the non-RDN group (–1.80) (P = .0002) and more chronic illnesses throughout the study period. BMIz progressed in both groups, although improvements in BMIz were better in the RDN group (all P values < .05). The clinical outcomes were all worse in the RDN group (P < .0001). The regression mixed model found a 0.14 BMIz improvement for the RDN group (P = .0057).
Conclusions
Despite being more malnourished and sicker overall, an RDN visit for chronically ill, malnourished children was associated with an improvement in BMIz but not with other clinical outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics is the premier source for the practice and science of food, nutrition, and dietetics. The monthly, peer-reviewed journal presents original articles prepared by scholars and practitioners and is the most widely read professional publication in the field. The Journal focuses on advancing professional knowledge across the range of research and practice issues such as: nutritional science, medical nutrition therapy, public health nutrition, food science and biotechnology, foodservice systems, leadership and management, and dietetics education.