{"title":"Costs of love: a constrained utility approach to marital decisions and family outcomes","authors":"Olatunji A. Shobande","doi":"10.1016/j.rie.2025.101064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Marriage endures as a cornerstone of social life, but its modern practice reveals a fraught entanglement of romantic ideals, financial burdens, and entrenched cultural norms. Notably, the escalating cost of weddings imposes a disproportionate economic strain, often at odds with more substantive long-term aims such as child welfare, financial resilience, and domestic stability. This study explores how the rising cost of weddings intersects with emotional, economic, and sociocultural constraints to shape marital decisions and long-term household outcomes. It introduces a constrained intertemporal utility model that conceptualizes marriage as an optimization problem. The model incorporates an objective function focused on long-term household and child well-being, constrained by factors such as income, education, wealth, emotional attachment, divorce costs, child support obligations, family norms, and cultural pressures. The analysis yields eight key propositions. The analyses suggest that financial stress from lavish weddings, delayed educational investments, and external social pressures negatively affect marital satisfaction and child outcomes. Conversely, balanced financial planning and cultural alignment are associated with greater household stability. The model highlights how economic and social trade-offs at the point of marriage formation can have enduring consequences. Policy implications include the need for broader social awareness around the economic burden of weddings and more supportive frameworks for long-term family welfare.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46094,"journal":{"name":"Research in Economics","volume":"79 3","pages":"Article 101064"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090944325000419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Marriage endures as a cornerstone of social life, but its modern practice reveals a fraught entanglement of romantic ideals, financial burdens, and entrenched cultural norms. Notably, the escalating cost of weddings imposes a disproportionate economic strain, often at odds with more substantive long-term aims such as child welfare, financial resilience, and domestic stability. This study explores how the rising cost of weddings intersects with emotional, economic, and sociocultural constraints to shape marital decisions and long-term household outcomes. It introduces a constrained intertemporal utility model that conceptualizes marriage as an optimization problem. The model incorporates an objective function focused on long-term household and child well-being, constrained by factors such as income, education, wealth, emotional attachment, divorce costs, child support obligations, family norms, and cultural pressures. The analysis yields eight key propositions. The analyses suggest that financial stress from lavish weddings, delayed educational investments, and external social pressures negatively affect marital satisfaction and child outcomes. Conversely, balanced financial planning and cultural alignment are associated with greater household stability. The model highlights how economic and social trade-offs at the point of marriage formation can have enduring consequences. Policy implications include the need for broader social awareness around the economic burden of weddings and more supportive frameworks for long-term family welfare.
期刊介绍:
Established in 1947, Research in Economics is one of the oldest general-interest economics journals in the world and the main one among those based in Italy. The purpose of the journal is to select original theoretical and empirical articles that will have high impact on the debate in the social sciences; since 1947, it has published important research contributions on a wide range of topics. A summary of our editorial policy is this: the editors make a preliminary assessment of whether the results of a paper, if correct, are worth publishing. If so one of the associate editors reviews the paper: from the reviewer we expect to learn if the paper is understandable and coherent and - within reasonable bounds - the results are correct. We believe that long lags in publication and multiple demands for revision simply slow scientific progress. Our goal is to provide you a definitive answer within one month of submission. We give the editors one week to judge the overall contribution and if acceptable send your paper to an associate editor. We expect the associate editor to provide a more detailed evaluation within three weeks so that the editors can make a final decision before the month expires. In the (rare) case of a revision we allow four months and in the case of conditional acceptance we allow two months to submit the final version. In both cases we expect a cover letter explaining how you met the requirements. For conditional acceptance the editors will verify that the requirements were met. In the case of revision the original associate editor will do so. If the revision cannot be at least conditionally accepted it is rejected: there is no second revision.