Costs of love: a constrained utility approach to marital decisions and family outcomes

IF 1.2 Q3 ECONOMICS
Olatunji A. Shobande
{"title":"Costs of love: a constrained utility approach to marital decisions and family outcomes","authors":"Olatunji A. Shobande","doi":"10.1016/j.rie.2025.101064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Marriage endures as a cornerstone of social life, but its modern practice reveals a fraught entanglement of romantic ideals, financial burdens, and entrenched cultural norms. Notably, the escalating cost of weddings imposes a disproportionate economic strain, often at odds with more substantive long-term aims such as child welfare, financial resilience, and domestic stability. This study explores how the rising cost of weddings intersects with emotional, economic, and sociocultural constraints to shape marital decisions and long-term household outcomes. It introduces a constrained intertemporal utility model that conceptualizes marriage as an optimization problem. The model incorporates an objective function focused on long-term household and child well-being, constrained by factors such as income, education, wealth, emotional attachment, divorce costs, child support obligations, family norms, and cultural pressures. The analysis yields eight key propositions. The analyses suggest that financial stress from lavish weddings, delayed educational investments, and external social pressures negatively affect marital satisfaction and child outcomes. Conversely, balanced financial planning and cultural alignment are associated with greater household stability. The model highlights how economic and social trade-offs at the point of marriage formation can have enduring consequences. Policy implications include the need for broader social awareness around the economic burden of weddings and more supportive frameworks for long-term family welfare.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46094,"journal":{"name":"Research in Economics","volume":"79 3","pages":"Article 101064"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090944325000419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Marriage endures as a cornerstone of social life, but its modern practice reveals a fraught entanglement of romantic ideals, financial burdens, and entrenched cultural norms. Notably, the escalating cost of weddings imposes a disproportionate economic strain, often at odds with more substantive long-term aims such as child welfare, financial resilience, and domestic stability. This study explores how the rising cost of weddings intersects with emotional, economic, and sociocultural constraints to shape marital decisions and long-term household outcomes. It introduces a constrained intertemporal utility model that conceptualizes marriage as an optimization problem. The model incorporates an objective function focused on long-term household and child well-being, constrained by factors such as income, education, wealth, emotional attachment, divorce costs, child support obligations, family norms, and cultural pressures. The analysis yields eight key propositions. The analyses suggest that financial stress from lavish weddings, delayed educational investments, and external social pressures negatively affect marital satisfaction and child outcomes. Conversely, balanced financial planning and cultural alignment are associated with greater household stability. The model highlights how economic and social trade-offs at the point of marriage formation can have enduring consequences. Policy implications include the need for broader social awareness around the economic burden of weddings and more supportive frameworks for long-term family welfare.
爱的代价:婚姻决定和家庭结果的约束效用方法
婚姻作为社会生活的基石经久不衰,但它的现代实践揭示了浪漫理想、经济负担和根深蒂固的文化规范之间令人担忧的纠缠。值得注意的是,不断上涨的婚礼成本造成了不成比例的经济压力,往往与儿童福利、经济弹性和家庭稳定等更实质性的长期目标不一致。本研究探讨了不断上升的婚礼成本如何与情感、经济和社会文化约束相互作用,从而影响婚姻决定和长期家庭结果。引入了一种约束跨期实用新型,将婚姻概念化为一个优化问题。该模型结合了一个关注家庭和儿童长期福祉的目标函数,受收入、教育、财富、情感依恋、离婚成本、子女抚养义务、家庭规范和文化压力等因素的制约。分析得出了八个关键命题。分析表明,奢侈的婚礼、延迟的教育投资和外部社会压力带来的经济压力会对婚姻满意度和孩子的成长产生负面影响。相反,平衡的财务规划和文化一致性与更大的家庭稳定性有关。该模型强调了婚姻形成时的经济和社会权衡如何产生持久的后果。政策影响包括需要对婚礼的经济负担有更广泛的社会意识,以及对长期家庭福利有更多的支持框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
89 days
期刊介绍: Established in 1947, Research in Economics is one of the oldest general-interest economics journals in the world and the main one among those based in Italy. The purpose of the journal is to select original theoretical and empirical articles that will have high impact on the debate in the social sciences; since 1947, it has published important research contributions on a wide range of topics. A summary of our editorial policy is this: the editors make a preliminary assessment of whether the results of a paper, if correct, are worth publishing. If so one of the associate editors reviews the paper: from the reviewer we expect to learn if the paper is understandable and coherent and - within reasonable bounds - the results are correct. We believe that long lags in publication and multiple demands for revision simply slow scientific progress. Our goal is to provide you a definitive answer within one month of submission. We give the editors one week to judge the overall contribution and if acceptable send your paper to an associate editor. We expect the associate editor to provide a more detailed evaluation within three weeks so that the editors can make a final decision before the month expires. In the (rare) case of a revision we allow four months and in the case of conditional acceptance we allow two months to submit the final version. In both cases we expect a cover letter explaining how you met the requirements. For conditional acceptance the editors will verify that the requirements were met. In the case of revision the original associate editor will do so. If the revision cannot be at least conditionally accepted it is rejected: there is no second revision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信