Ceftriaxone-induced hypersensitivity in pregnancy: Insights from a case of variable reactions to different brands

Mohammad Ashraful Amin , Sadia Monami , Tasnim Zerin Shama , Sabrina Nahin , Mohammad Delwer Hossain Hawlader
{"title":"Ceftriaxone-induced hypersensitivity in pregnancy: Insights from a case of variable reactions to different brands","authors":"Mohammad Ashraful Amin ,&nbsp;Sadia Monami ,&nbsp;Tasnim Zerin Shama ,&nbsp;Sabrina Nahin ,&nbsp;Mohammad Delwer Hossain Hawlader","doi":"10.1016/j.hmedic.2025.100263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ceftriaxone, a third-generation cephalosporin, is widely used for its broad-spectrum antibacterial activity but poses challenges in managing hypersensitivity reactions, particularly in pregnant patients. This case study explores a 35-year-old woman in her second trimester of a twin pregnancy with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus and pregnancy-induced hypertension. She was referred for a urinary tract infection (UTI) caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae. Initial treatments with erythromycin and sulbactam/cefoperazone were ineffective, leading to the use of ceftriaxone. A skin test revealed severe hypersensitivity to ceftriaxone from one manufacturer (\"Brand A\") but not to another (\"Brand B\"). After careful consideration, a 10-day course of parenteral ceftriaxone from Brand B was administered without adverse reactions. The observed variability in hypersensitivity reactions between different brands of ceftriaxone highlights the potential influence of formulation differences on patient tolerance. This underscores the importance of individualized patient assessment, including skin testing necessary, to ensure both safety and efficacy, particularly in high-risk populations such as pregnant patients. This finding emphasizes the necessity for skin testing in pregnant patients where treatment options are limited and both maternal and fetal safety are paramount.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100908,"journal":{"name":"Medical Reports","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100263"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949918625001081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ceftriaxone, a third-generation cephalosporin, is widely used for its broad-spectrum antibacterial activity but poses challenges in managing hypersensitivity reactions, particularly in pregnant patients. This case study explores a 35-year-old woman in her second trimester of a twin pregnancy with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus and pregnancy-induced hypertension. She was referred for a urinary tract infection (UTI) caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae. Initial treatments with erythromycin and sulbactam/cefoperazone were ineffective, leading to the use of ceftriaxone. A skin test revealed severe hypersensitivity to ceftriaxone from one manufacturer ("Brand A") but not to another ("Brand B"). After careful consideration, a 10-day course of parenteral ceftriaxone from Brand B was administered without adverse reactions. The observed variability in hypersensitivity reactions between different brands of ceftriaxone highlights the potential influence of formulation differences on patient tolerance. This underscores the importance of individualized patient assessment, including skin testing necessary, to ensure both safety and efficacy, particularly in high-risk populations such as pregnant patients. This finding emphasizes the necessity for skin testing in pregnant patients where treatment options are limited and both maternal and fetal safety are paramount.
妊娠期头孢曲松致超敏反应:对不同品牌不同反应的个案分析
头孢曲松是第三代头孢菌素,因其广谱抗菌活性而被广泛使用,但在处理过敏反应方面存在挑战,特别是在孕妇中。本病例研究探讨了一名35岁的双胎妊娠中期妇女,她有妊娠糖尿病和妊娠高血压史。她因肺炎克雷伯菌引起的尿路感染(UTI)被转诊。最初使用红霉素和舒巴坦/头孢哌酮治疗无效,导致使用头孢曲松。皮肤试验显示对一种制造商(“A品牌”)的头孢曲松严重过敏,但对另一种制造商(“B品牌”)没有过敏反应。经慎重考虑,给予B牌头孢曲松10天静脉注射疗程,无不良反应。观察到的不同品牌头孢曲松超敏反应的差异突出了配方差异对患者耐受性的潜在影响。这强调了个体化患者评估的重要性,包括必要的皮肤试验,以确保安全性和有效性,特别是在高危人群,如孕妇患者中。这一发现强调了在治疗选择有限、母婴安全至关重要的孕妇中进行皮肤试验的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信