An international portrait of pharmacists' professional role identities: A Q-methodology innovative study

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Kaitlyn E. Watson , Theresa J. Schindel , Sherly Meilianti , Ross T. Tsuyuki , Yazid N. Al Hamarneh
{"title":"An international portrait of pharmacists' professional role identities: A Q-methodology innovative study","authors":"Kaitlyn E. Watson ,&nbsp;Theresa J. Schindel ,&nbsp;Sherly Meilianti ,&nbsp;Ross T. Tsuyuki ,&nbsp;Yazid N. Al Hamarneh","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Professional identities shape who pharmacists are, what they do, and what they stand for as professionals. Novel research methodologies have potential to illuminate pharmacists' professional identity and roles in new and innovative ways. This study aimed to explore international pharmacists' identity through reflection on their professional roles.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Q Methodology, which uses quantitative techniques to systematically study subjectivity, was used to allow for an in-depth analysis of professional identity. The participants were self-identified pharmacists working in patient-facing roles who attended the International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP) Congress in Brisbane, Australia, from September 24–28, 2023. They completed Q methodology online activities to sort the Q-Set within a fixed quasi-normal distribution grid.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty participants completed the Q-Sort activity. Participants came from 10 countries (five of the six World Health Organization regions), two thirds identified as women and approximately one third practiced in hospital and community pharmacy settings, respectively. Three factor arrays are described, which explain 52 % of the variance; Factor 1: Pharmacists as autonomous healthcare providers AND clinical team members; Factor 2: Pharmacists as healthcare providers for individual patients; and Factor 3: Pharmacists as managers first, then healthcare providers.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study offers a new perspective, revealing how various roles may converge to form a pharmacist's professional role identity: for example, autonomous healthcare providers AND clinical team members AND patient-focused practitioners AND leaders mindful of management responsibilities. Viewing the Q Methodology with a systems thinking lens illuminates pharmacists' professional identities as neither a mere sum of the roles and services they provide, nor represented by a singular aspect of their professional work. Recognizing the complexity of the pharmacists' identities as individuals helps to break free from the cognitive dissonance that has plagued the profession suggesting that professional identity is represented by singular or often competing roles as the scope of pharmacy practice evolves.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100616"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276625000575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Professional identities shape who pharmacists are, what they do, and what they stand for as professionals. Novel research methodologies have potential to illuminate pharmacists' professional identity and roles in new and innovative ways. This study aimed to explore international pharmacists' identity through reflection on their professional roles.

Methods

Q Methodology, which uses quantitative techniques to systematically study subjectivity, was used to allow for an in-depth analysis of professional identity. The participants were self-identified pharmacists working in patient-facing roles who attended the International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP) Congress in Brisbane, Australia, from September 24–28, 2023. They completed Q methodology online activities to sort the Q-Set within a fixed quasi-normal distribution grid.

Results

Twenty participants completed the Q-Sort activity. Participants came from 10 countries (five of the six World Health Organization regions), two thirds identified as women and approximately one third practiced in hospital and community pharmacy settings, respectively. Three factor arrays are described, which explain 52 % of the variance; Factor 1: Pharmacists as autonomous healthcare providers AND clinical team members; Factor 2: Pharmacists as healthcare providers for individual patients; and Factor 3: Pharmacists as managers first, then healthcare providers.

Conclusion

This study offers a new perspective, revealing how various roles may converge to form a pharmacist's professional role identity: for example, autonomous healthcare providers AND clinical team members AND patient-focused practitioners AND leaders mindful of management responsibilities. Viewing the Q Methodology with a systems thinking lens illuminates pharmacists' professional identities as neither a mere sum of the roles and services they provide, nor represented by a singular aspect of their professional work. Recognizing the complexity of the pharmacists' identities as individuals helps to break free from the cognitive dissonance that has plagued the profession suggesting that professional identity is represented by singular or often competing roles as the scope of pharmacy practice evolves.
药师职业角色认同的国际概况:q -方法论创新研究
职业身份塑造了药剂师是谁,他们做什么,他们作为专业人士代表什么。新颖的研究方法有可能以新的和创新的方式阐明药剂师的职业身份和角色。本研究旨在通过对国际药师职业角色的反思,探讨国际药师的身份认同。方法使用定量技术系统地研究主观性的方法学,允许对职业认同进行深入分析。参与者是自认为是面向患者的药剂师,他们参加了2023年9月24日至28日在澳大利亚布里斯班举行的国际制药联合会(FIP)大会。他们完成了Q方法学在线活动,在固定的准正态分布网格内对Q集进行排序。结果20名参与者完成了Q-Sort活动。参与者来自10个国家(世界卫生组织六个区域中的五个),三分之二被确定为妇女,大约三分之一分别在医院和社区药房工作。描述了三个因素阵列,它们解释了52%的方差;因素1:药师作为自主医疗服务提供者和临床团队成员;因素2:药剂师作为个体患者的医疗保健提供者;因素3:药剂师首先是管理者,然后是医疗服务提供者。结论本研究提供了一个新的视角,揭示了不同的角色如何汇聚形成药剂师的职业角色认同:例如,自主的医疗保健提供者和临床团队成员以及以患者为中心的从业者和关注管理责任的领导者。用系统思维的视角来看待Q方法论,说明药剂师的职业身份既不是他们提供的角色和服务的简单总和,也不是他们专业工作的单一方面。认识到药剂师作为个体身份的复杂性有助于摆脱困扰该职业的认知失调,这表明随着药学实践范围的发展,职业身份由单一或经常竞争的角色代表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信