Covid-19 vaccine incentives' effectiveness and differential impact on high-risk groups: A prospective cohort study

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Noel T. Brewer , Emmanuel M. Rockwell , Aditi Tomar , Edwin B. Fisher , Melissa B. Gilkey , Allison J. Lazard , Joseph G. Ibrahim
{"title":"Covid-19 vaccine incentives' effectiveness and differential impact on high-risk groups: A prospective cohort study","authors":"Noel T. Brewer ,&nbsp;Emmanuel M. Rockwell ,&nbsp;Aditi Tomar ,&nbsp;Edwin B. Fisher ,&nbsp;Melissa B. Gilkey ,&nbsp;Allison J. Lazard ,&nbsp;Joseph G. Ibrahim","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>We sought to evaluate the impact of guaranteed immediate cash incentives on Covid-19 vaccine initiation. We hypothesized that incentives' impact is bigger at vaccination sites serving higher risk patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants were 4,303,542 adults who received a first Covid-19 vaccine dose in North Carolina, US from December 2020 through August 2021. The state's incentive program guaranteed payments of $25 (and later $100) immediately after receiving the first dose of Covid-19 vaccine or $25 for providing transportation. Analyses used a difference in differences approach.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Covid-19 vaccine initiation declined less over time in the 32 vaccination sites offering incentives than in 2352 comparison sites (interaction <em>p</em> &lt; .001). Incentive program vaccination sites saw Covid-19 vaccine initiation fall from an average of 382 doses per week to 72 doses. This was a decline of 81% in unadjusted analysis, and 51% after adjusting for covariates (IRR = 0.49, 95%CI = 0.46–0.52). Sites not offering the incentives saw Covid-19 vaccine initiation fall from an average of 168 doses per week to 24 doses. This was a decline of 86% in unadjusted analyses, and 83% in adjusted analyses (IRR = 0.17, 95%CI = 0.17–0.18). The incentive program was more effective for sites serving more patients who were young, male, Hispanic, and American Indian and Alaska Native (3-way interactions, all <em>p</em> &lt; .001) but not Black.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Vaccination sites offering incentives had a smaller decline in Covid-19 vaccine uptake, though the mechanism requires additional study. Vaccine incentive programs may be more effective at sites serving more younger, male, Hispanic and Native patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 127302"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X25005997","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

We sought to evaluate the impact of guaranteed immediate cash incentives on Covid-19 vaccine initiation. We hypothesized that incentives' impact is bigger at vaccination sites serving higher risk patients.

Methods

Participants were 4,303,542 adults who received a first Covid-19 vaccine dose in North Carolina, US from December 2020 through August 2021. The state's incentive program guaranteed payments of $25 (and later $100) immediately after receiving the first dose of Covid-19 vaccine or $25 for providing transportation. Analyses used a difference in differences approach.

Results

Covid-19 vaccine initiation declined less over time in the 32 vaccination sites offering incentives than in 2352 comparison sites (interaction p < .001). Incentive program vaccination sites saw Covid-19 vaccine initiation fall from an average of 382 doses per week to 72 doses. This was a decline of 81% in unadjusted analysis, and 51% after adjusting for covariates (IRR = 0.49, 95%CI = 0.46–0.52). Sites not offering the incentives saw Covid-19 vaccine initiation fall from an average of 168 doses per week to 24 doses. This was a decline of 86% in unadjusted analyses, and 83% in adjusted analyses (IRR = 0.17, 95%CI = 0.17–0.18). The incentive program was more effective for sites serving more patients who were young, male, Hispanic, and American Indian and Alaska Native (3-way interactions, all p < .001) but not Black.

Conclusion

Vaccination sites offering incentives had a smaller decline in Covid-19 vaccine uptake, though the mechanism requires additional study. Vaccine incentive programs may be more effective at sites serving more younger, male, Hispanic and Native patients.
Covid-19疫苗激励措施对高危人群的有效性和差异影响:一项前瞻性队列研究
我们试图评估保证即时现金奖励对Covid-19疫苗启动的影响。我们假设,在为高风险患者服务的疫苗接种地点,激励措施的影响更大。研究对象是2020年12月至2021年8月在美国北卡罗来纳州接种了第一剂Covid-19疫苗的4,303,542名成年人。该州的奖励计划保证在接种第一剂Covid-19疫苗后立即支付25美元(后来是100美元),或提供25美元的交通费。分析使用了差异中的差异方法。结果与2352个比较点相比,32个提供奖励的疫苗接种点的covid -19疫苗启动率随时间的下降幅度较小(相互作用p <;措施)。奖励计划疫苗接种地点的新冠病毒疫苗启动量从平均每周382剂降至72剂。在未调整分析中下降81%,在调整协变量后下降51% (IRR = 0.49, 95%CI = 0.46-0.52)。没有提供激励措施的地方,新冠病毒疫苗接种量从平均每周168剂下降到24剂。在未调整的分析中下降了86%,在调整后的分析中下降了83% (IRR = 0.17, 95%CI = 0.17 - 0.18)。奖励计划对于服务更多年轻、男性、西班牙裔、美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民患者的医院更为有效(3-way交互,均为p <;.001)但不是布莱克。结论提供激励措施的疫苗接种地点的Covid-19疫苗吸收率下降幅度较小,但其机制有待进一步研究。疫苗激励计划在服务更多年轻人、男性、西班牙裔和土著患者的地方可能更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信