Why do we keep killing crows? Farmers’ attachment to a controversial method in an attempt to protect their crops

IF 5.1 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Juliette Craplet , Amal Chantoufi , Eve-Anne Laurent , Claude Compagnone , Alice Baux
{"title":"Why do we keep killing crows? Farmers’ attachment to a controversial method in an attempt to protect their crops","authors":"Juliette Craplet ,&nbsp;Amal Chantoufi ,&nbsp;Eve-Anne Laurent ,&nbsp;Claude Compagnone ,&nbsp;Alice Baux","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Corvids are responsible for important damage to spring crops across western Switzerland and have become a significant concern for the farming community. Various prevention methods have been tested to reduce agricultural losses, but no suitable solution has been found. In an attempt to solve this problem, the Swiss farming community is asking the authorities, despite its relative unpopularity, to liberalize control shooting. However, the effectiveness of this control method has never been scientifically proven, and the few studies in ecology or conservation biology that question its efficiency are not considered by the farming community. This raises the question of why the attachment to an uncertain and controversial method is so strong. By bringing out the farming community's dominant representation of the problem of corvid damage and analyzing the stakeholder network dynamics, this article aims to highlight the social logics and multifactorial dimension of choosing a control method. We found that the fight against corvid damage is part of a more general conflict that pits the farming community against the rest of society on issues of ecology and production. Various social, cultural and cognitive logics lead the farming community to remain attached to control shooting, making a cognitive gamble that has no solid scientific basis. To succeed in getting farmers to abandon control shooting, three conditions must be met: the emergence of a replacement innovation, awareness of the negative practical, economic and ethical aspects of control shooting, and improved access to scientific knowledge on the subject in the farming world.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103707"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725001470","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Corvids are responsible for important damage to spring crops across western Switzerland and have become a significant concern for the farming community. Various prevention methods have been tested to reduce agricultural losses, but no suitable solution has been found. In an attempt to solve this problem, the Swiss farming community is asking the authorities, despite its relative unpopularity, to liberalize control shooting. However, the effectiveness of this control method has never been scientifically proven, and the few studies in ecology or conservation biology that question its efficiency are not considered by the farming community. This raises the question of why the attachment to an uncertain and controversial method is so strong. By bringing out the farming community's dominant representation of the problem of corvid damage and analyzing the stakeholder network dynamics, this article aims to highlight the social logics and multifactorial dimension of choosing a control method. We found that the fight against corvid damage is part of a more general conflict that pits the farming community against the rest of society on issues of ecology and production. Various social, cultural and cognitive logics lead the farming community to remain attached to control shooting, making a cognitive gamble that has no solid scientific basis. To succeed in getting farmers to abandon control shooting, three conditions must be met: the emergence of a replacement innovation, awareness of the negative practical, economic and ethical aspects of control shooting, and improved access to scientific knowledge on the subject in the farming world.
为什么我们一直在杀乌鸦?农民们为了保护他们的庄稼而采用一种有争议的方法
鸦类对瑞士西部的春季作物造成了重大损害,已成为农业社区的一个重大问题。已经试验了各种预防方法以减少农业损失,但没有找到合适的解决办法。为了解决这一问题,瑞士农业界正要求当局放开对射击的控制,尽管这一做法相对不受欢迎。然而,这种控制方法的有效性从未得到科学证明,生态学或保护生物学中对其有效性提出质疑的少数研究也没有得到农业社区的考虑。这就提出了一个问题:为什么对一种不确定和有争议的方法的依恋如此强烈?本文旨在通过揭示农业社区对鸦害问题的主导表征,分析利益相关者网络动态,突出选择控制方法的社会逻辑和多因素维度。我们发现,与鳕鱼损害的斗争是农业社区与社会其他部分在生态和生产问题上更普遍冲突的一部分。各种社会、文化和认知逻辑导致农民群体对控制射击保持依恋,这是一场没有坚实科学依据的认知赌博。要成功地让农民放弃管制射击,必须满足三个条件:一种替代创新的出现,对管制射击的负面实践、经济和伦理方面的认识,以及在农业世界中更好地获得有关该主题的科学知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信