Learning from the past and embracing future opportunities: Perceptions of new Environmental Land Management Schemes and private nature markets

IF 5.1 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
K. Dewally, R.H. Bark, A.R. Harwood, A.A. Lovett
{"title":"Learning from the past and embracing future opportunities: Perceptions of new Environmental Land Management Schemes and private nature markets","authors":"K. Dewally,&nbsp;R.H. Bark,&nbsp;A.R. Harwood,&nbsp;A.A. Lovett","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The combination of Brexit and UK government targets, e.g., to address climate change and biodiversity loss, has accelerated the development of new Agri-environmental Scheme (AES), the Environmental Land Management Schemes (ELMS). To improve ELMS design and implementation, it is timely to understand farmers' and farm advisers’ views on these schemes, including their design, rollout and fit with pre-existing and new nature markets, e.g., carbon, Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG). Previous research has assessed AES for their attractiveness to farmers and effectiveness. This study examines new challenges associated with the increasing role of the private sector in funding nature recovery on farms, expected increased levels of participation and an increased requirement for collaboration to deliver landscape-scale nature recovery.</div><div>To understand how this new policy landscape is perceived by the agricultural sector, 18 interviews were conducted with farmers and advisors (farmer advisors and nature market experts). Findings show that perceptions are shaped by previous involvement with AES (e.g., payment rates, participation costs, inflexibility) which although largely negative, highlight areas for better scheme design. New insights on farmer participation emphasise the roles of policy uncertainty, market integrity concerns, and collaboration, including with non-farmers, e.g., conservation organisations, water companies. Slow policy release was stressed as a key reason for low adoption and underscores the importance of aligning AES incentives with policy objectives. Furthermore, participants raised a need for cross market compatibility, compliance flexibility and fundamental questions about achieving carbon neutrality as a prerequisite for carbon market participation. On the positive side, participants agreed that new schemes/markets are breaking down social barriers through the necessity to work with a wider group of stakeholders and have been a driver for increasing interest in farm clusters.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103723"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725001639","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The combination of Brexit and UK government targets, e.g., to address climate change and biodiversity loss, has accelerated the development of new Agri-environmental Scheme (AES), the Environmental Land Management Schemes (ELMS). To improve ELMS design and implementation, it is timely to understand farmers' and farm advisers’ views on these schemes, including their design, rollout and fit with pre-existing and new nature markets, e.g., carbon, Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG). Previous research has assessed AES for their attractiveness to farmers and effectiveness. This study examines new challenges associated with the increasing role of the private sector in funding nature recovery on farms, expected increased levels of participation and an increased requirement for collaboration to deliver landscape-scale nature recovery.
To understand how this new policy landscape is perceived by the agricultural sector, 18 interviews were conducted with farmers and advisors (farmer advisors and nature market experts). Findings show that perceptions are shaped by previous involvement with AES (e.g., payment rates, participation costs, inflexibility) which although largely negative, highlight areas for better scheme design. New insights on farmer participation emphasise the roles of policy uncertainty, market integrity concerns, and collaboration, including with non-farmers, e.g., conservation organisations, water companies. Slow policy release was stressed as a key reason for low adoption and underscores the importance of aligning AES incentives with policy objectives. Furthermore, participants raised a need for cross market compatibility, compliance flexibility and fundamental questions about achieving carbon neutrality as a prerequisite for carbon market participation. On the positive side, participants agreed that new schemes/markets are breaking down social barriers through the necessity to work with a wider group of stakeholders and have been a driver for increasing interest in farm clusters.
学习过去,拥抱未来:对新的环境土地管理计划和私人自然市场的看法
英国脱欧和英国政府目标的结合,例如应对气候变化和生物多样性丧失,加速了新的农业环境计划(AES)和环境土地管理计划(ELMS)的发展。为了改进生态环境管理系统的设计和实施,及时了解农民和农场顾问对这些计划的看法,包括它们的设计、推出以及与现有和新的自然市场(如碳、生物多样性净收益(BNG))的契合度。以前的研究已经评估了AES对农民的吸引力和有效性。本研究探讨了与私营部门在资助农场自然恢复方面日益重要的作用、预期参与水平的提高以及为实现景观规模的自然恢复而对合作的需求的增加相关的新挑战。为了了解农业部门如何看待这一新的政策格局,我们对农民和顾问(农民顾问和自然市场专家)进行了18次访谈。调查结果表明,以往参与AES的情况(例如,付款率、参与成本、缺乏灵活性)影响了人们的看法,尽管这些看法在很大程度上是负面的,但却突出了方案设计方面的改进。关于农民参与的新见解强调了政策不确定性、市场完整性问题和合作的作用,包括与非农民的合作,如保护组织、供水公司。会议强调,政策发布缓慢是采用率低的一个关键原因,并强调了将AES激励措施与政策目标结合起来的重要性。此外,与会者还提出了跨市场兼容性、合规灵活性和实现碳中和的基本问题,这是参与碳市场的先决条件。积极的一面是,与会者一致认为,新的计划/市场通过与更广泛的利益相关者群体合作的必要性打破了社会障碍,并推动了对农业集群的兴趣增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信