A three-dimensional integrated evaluation system for product competitiveness under complex demands: An LDA and PSO-FAHP based hybrid optimization approach

IF 6.8 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Kun Wang , Kexiang Li , Xueqian Jiang , Jiawei Lin , Xuan Liu , Zhuang Xiong , Guojie Ji , Bingzhe Li
{"title":"A three-dimensional integrated evaluation system for product competitiveness under complex demands: An LDA and PSO-FAHP based hybrid optimization approach","authors":"Kun Wang ,&nbsp;Kexiang Li ,&nbsp;Xueqian Jiang ,&nbsp;Jiawei Lin ,&nbsp;Xuan Liu ,&nbsp;Zhuang Xiong ,&nbsp;Guojie Ji ,&nbsp;Bingzhe Li","doi":"10.1016/j.aej.2025.05.061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Given the lack of interpretability and limited adaptability of traditional product evaluation methods due to their reliance on expert experience, this study proposes an integrated evaluation system that integrates LDA-PSO-FAHP. LDA topic modeling analyzes user-generated content, extracts potential product attributes and consumer needs, and constructs a three-dimensional evaluation system. Secondly, a PSO-FAHP hybrid decision model is developed, and the initial weights are generated using fuzzy hierarchical analysis combined with particle swarm optimization to correct the judgment matrix dynamically. Then, the design case of elderly walkers is used as an empirical object, and verification shows that the system evaluation results are significantly positively correlated with the sales growth rate of the B2B platform and the user praise rate. Finally, comparative experiments prove that this method is superior to traditional methods in terms of consistency of judgment matrix and accuracy of weight calculation. The system aims to provide a decision-making tool for the manufacturing industry that considers both market semantic analysis and design parameter optimization and helps product development transform from a subjective experience-driven to a data-model collaborative decision-making paradigm.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7484,"journal":{"name":"alexandria engineering journal","volume":"128 ","pages":"Pages 394-412"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"alexandria engineering journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110016825006891","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the lack of interpretability and limited adaptability of traditional product evaluation methods due to their reliance on expert experience, this study proposes an integrated evaluation system that integrates LDA-PSO-FAHP. LDA topic modeling analyzes user-generated content, extracts potential product attributes and consumer needs, and constructs a three-dimensional evaluation system. Secondly, a PSO-FAHP hybrid decision model is developed, and the initial weights are generated using fuzzy hierarchical analysis combined with particle swarm optimization to correct the judgment matrix dynamically. Then, the design case of elderly walkers is used as an empirical object, and verification shows that the system evaluation results are significantly positively correlated with the sales growth rate of the B2B platform and the user praise rate. Finally, comparative experiments prove that this method is superior to traditional methods in terms of consistency of judgment matrix and accuracy of weight calculation. The system aims to provide a decision-making tool for the manufacturing industry that considers both market semantic analysis and design parameter optimization and helps product development transform from a subjective experience-driven to a data-model collaborative decision-making paradigm.
复杂需求下产品竞争力三维综合评价体系:基于LDA和PSO-FAHP的混合优化方法
针对传统产品评价方法依赖专家经验而缺乏可解释性和适应性的问题,本研究提出了一种集成LDA-PSO-FAHP的综合评价体系。LDA主题建模分析用户生成的内容,提取潜在的产品属性和消费者需求,构建三维评价体系。其次,建立了PSO-FAHP混合决策模型,采用模糊层次分析结合粒子群优化生成初始权值,对判断矩阵进行动态修正;然后,以老年助行车的设计案例作为实证对象,验证表明,系统评价结果与B2B平台的销售增长率和用户好评率呈显著正相关。最后通过对比实验证明,该方法在判断矩阵的一致性和权重计算的准确性方面优于传统方法。该系统旨在为制造业提供一个兼顾市场语义分析和设计参数优化的决策工具,帮助产品开发从主观经验驱动型决策范式转变为数据模型协同决策范式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
alexandria engineering journal
alexandria engineering journal Engineering-General Engineering
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
4.40%
发文量
1015
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Alexandria Engineering Journal is an international journal devoted to publishing high quality papers in the field of engineering and applied science. Alexandria Engineering Journal is cited in the Engineering Information Services (EIS) and the Chemical Abstracts (CA). The papers published in Alexandria Engineering Journal are grouped into five sections, according to the following classification: • Mechanical, Production, Marine and Textile Engineering • Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Nuclear Engineering • Civil and Architecture Engineering • Chemical Engineering and Applied Sciences • Environmental Engineering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信