Randomized clinical trial evaluating kinetic benefits of desensitizing agents: Magnitude, onset, and stability of relief

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Aaron R. Biesbrock, Tao He, Yuanshu Zou, Julie M. Grender, Pejmon Amini, Paul A. Sagel, Andrew Groth, Malgorzata Klukowska
{"title":"Randomized clinical trial evaluating kinetic benefits of desensitizing agents: Magnitude, onset, and stability of relief","authors":"Aaron R. Biesbrock, Tao He, Yuanshu Zou, Julie M. Grender, Pejmon Amini, Paul A. Sagel, Andrew Groth, Malgorzata Klukowska","doi":"10.1002/jper.24-0688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundDentin hypersensitivity (DH) is common, particularly among periodontal patients. This trial evaluated magnitude of desensitizing benefit, onset of action, and complete relief of three dentifrices with distinct desensitizing technologies.MethodsHealthy adults with DH were enrolled and randomized to one of four dentifrices in this randomized, controlled, double‐blind trial: marketed potassium nitrate (KNO<jats:sub>3</jats:sub>), marketed stannous fluoride (SnF<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>), experimental 1.5% oxalate, or negative control (NC) monofluorophosphate. Participants brushed with their assigned dentifrice twice daily for 8 weeks, followed by 3 weeks during which all participants used the NC. DH was measured by thermal challenge (Schiff Index) and tactile challenge (Yeaple Probe) at baseline, Day 3, and Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 11.ResultsA total of 120 participants were randomized to treatment, and 118 completed the study. <jats:italic>Thermal challenge (Schiff)</jats:italic>: All treatments provided greater relief than NC at all timepoints (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> ≤ 0.004). The SnF<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> dentifrice had greater thermal improvements than KNO<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> dentifrice at Week 2 (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.021) and in a random coefficients model across all timepoints (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.015). The percentage of participants showing complete relief in at least one test tooth was greater for SnF<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> versus KNO<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> through Week 8 (all <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> ≤ 0.044). <jats:italic>Tactile challenge</jats:italic> (<jats:italic>Yeaple Probe)</jats:italic>: All treatments provided greater tactile sensitivity relief than NC at all timepoints (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> ≤ 0.019), except KNO<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> at Day 3 (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.197). The SnF<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> dentifrice had greater improvements in tactile scores versus the KNO<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> dentifrice at Day 3 (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.020).ConclusionSnF<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>, KNO<jats:sub>3</jats:sub>, and oxalate dentifrices significantly reduced DH over 8 weeks. SnF<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> dentifrice showed the greatest benefits for onset of relief, magnitude of benefit, and complete relief.Trial RegistrationNCT03965039Plain Language SummaryThis study tested four toothpastes for sensitivity relief, including speed and completeness of relief, among approximately 120 adults with sensitive teeth. They were randomly assigned to use one of four toothpastes: commercial toothpaste with potassium nitrate, commercial toothpaste with stannous fluoride, experimental toothpaste with oxalate, or standard fluoride toothpaste (control) with no antisensitivity ingredient. Participants used their toothpaste twice daily for 8 weeks, and then everyone used the control toothpaste for 3 weeks. Sensitivity was measured at the beginning of the study, after 3 days, and after 2, 4, 8, and 11 weeks by blowing cold air on sensitive teeth and moving a probe across the sensitive area (tactile assessment). The potassium nitrate, stannous fluoride, and oxalate toothpastes reduced sensitivity better than the control toothpaste at all times, except potassium nitrate toothpaste at Day 3 for tactile sensitivity. Stannous fluoride toothpaste reduced cold air sensitivity better than potassium nitrate toothpaste at Week 2 and across all times combined. More participants showed complete relief from cold air sensitivity for stannous fluoride toothpaste than potassium nitrate toothpaste through Week 8. Stannous fluoride toothpaste had greater improvements in tactile sensitivity versus potassium nitrate toothpaste at Day 3. Overall, stannous fluoride toothpaste was superior at relieving sensitivity.","PeriodicalId":16716,"journal":{"name":"Journal of periodontology","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.24-0688","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundDentin hypersensitivity (DH) is common, particularly among periodontal patients. This trial evaluated magnitude of desensitizing benefit, onset of action, and complete relief of three dentifrices with distinct desensitizing technologies.MethodsHealthy adults with DH were enrolled and randomized to one of four dentifrices in this randomized, controlled, double‐blind trial: marketed potassium nitrate (KNO3), marketed stannous fluoride (SnF2), experimental 1.5% oxalate, or negative control (NC) monofluorophosphate. Participants brushed with their assigned dentifrice twice daily for 8 weeks, followed by 3 weeks during which all participants used the NC. DH was measured by thermal challenge (Schiff Index) and tactile challenge (Yeaple Probe) at baseline, Day 3, and Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 11.ResultsA total of 120 participants were randomized to treatment, and 118 completed the study. Thermal challenge (Schiff): All treatments provided greater relief than NC at all timepoints (p ≤ 0.004). The SnF2 dentifrice had greater thermal improvements than KNO3 dentifrice at Week 2 (p = 0.021) and in a random coefficients model across all timepoints (p = 0.015). The percentage of participants showing complete relief in at least one test tooth was greater for SnF2 versus KNO3 through Week 8 (all p ≤ 0.044). Tactile challenge (Yeaple Probe): All treatments provided greater tactile sensitivity relief than NC at all timepoints (p ≤ 0.019), except KNO3 at Day 3 (p = 0.197). The SnF2 dentifrice had greater improvements in tactile scores versus the KNO3 dentifrice at Day 3 (p = 0.020).ConclusionSnF2, KNO3, and oxalate dentifrices significantly reduced DH over 8 weeks. SnF2 dentifrice showed the greatest benefits for onset of relief, magnitude of benefit, and complete relief.Trial RegistrationNCT03965039Plain Language SummaryThis study tested four toothpastes for sensitivity relief, including speed and completeness of relief, among approximately 120 adults with sensitive teeth. They were randomly assigned to use one of four toothpastes: commercial toothpaste with potassium nitrate, commercial toothpaste with stannous fluoride, experimental toothpaste with oxalate, or standard fluoride toothpaste (control) with no antisensitivity ingredient. Participants used their toothpaste twice daily for 8 weeks, and then everyone used the control toothpaste for 3 weeks. Sensitivity was measured at the beginning of the study, after 3 days, and after 2, 4, 8, and 11 weeks by blowing cold air on sensitive teeth and moving a probe across the sensitive area (tactile assessment). The potassium nitrate, stannous fluoride, and oxalate toothpastes reduced sensitivity better than the control toothpaste at all times, except potassium nitrate toothpaste at Day 3 for tactile sensitivity. Stannous fluoride toothpaste reduced cold air sensitivity better than potassium nitrate toothpaste at Week 2 and across all times combined. More participants showed complete relief from cold air sensitivity for stannous fluoride toothpaste than potassium nitrate toothpaste through Week 8. Stannous fluoride toothpaste had greater improvements in tactile sensitivity versus potassium nitrate toothpaste at Day 3. Overall, stannous fluoride toothpaste was superior at relieving sensitivity.
评估脱敏药物动力学益处的随机临床试验:大小、起效和缓解的稳定性
牙髓嘌呤过敏(DH)是常见的,特别是在牙周患者中。本试验评估了使用不同的脱敏技术对三种牙齿的脱敏效果、起效和完全缓解程度。方法在这项随机、对照、双盲的试验中,健康的DH成人被随机分为四组:硝酸钾(KNO3)、氟化亚锡(SnF2)、1.5%草酸盐和阴性对照(NC)单氟磷酸盐。参与者每天用指定的牙膏刷牙两次,持续8周,随后的3周,所有参与者都使用NC。在基线、第3天和第2、4、8和11周,通过热刺激(希夫指数)和触觉刺激(耶普尔探针)测量DH。结果共有120名参与者被随机分配到治疗组,其中118人完成了研究。热刺激(Schiff):在所有时间点,所有处理都比NC提供了更大的缓解(p≤0.004)。在所有时间点的随机系数模型中(p = 0.015), SnF2牙膏在第2周比KNO3牙膏有更大的热改善(p = 0.021)。到第8周,SnF2与KNO3相比,至少一颗测试牙齿完全缓解的参与者百分比更高(均p≤0.044)。触觉刺激(Yeaple探头):除KNO3在第3天(p = 0.197)外,所有治疗组在所有时间点的触觉敏感性缓解均优于NC (p≤0.019)。与KNO3组相比,SnF2组在第3天的触觉评分有更大的改善(p = 0.020)。结论snf2、KNO3和草酸盐牙液在8周内显著降低DH。SnF2牙膏在缓解开始、缓解幅度和完全缓解方面表现出最大的益处。本研究测试了四种牙膏的缓解敏感性,包括缓解的速度和完整性,在大约120名患有敏感牙齿的成年人中。他们被随机分配使用四种牙膏中的一种:含硝酸钾的商业牙膏,含氟亚锡的商业牙膏,含草酸盐的实验牙膏,或不含抗敏感成分的标准含氟牙膏(对照)。参与者每天使用两次牙膏,持续8周,然后每个人都使用对照牙膏3周。在研究开始、3天后、2周、4周、8周和11周后,通过在敏感牙齿上吹冷风并在敏感区域移动探针来测量灵敏度(触觉评估)。硝酸钾、氟化亚锡和草酸盐牙膏在任何时候都比对照牙膏更好地降低了敏感性,除了硝酸钾牙膏在第3天的触觉敏感性。在第二周和所有时间内,氟化亚锡牙膏比硝酸钾牙膏更好地降低了对冷空气的敏感性。在第8周,与硝酸钾牙膏相比,更多的参与者对氟化亚锡牙膏的冷空气敏感性得到完全缓解。在第三天,氟化亚锡牙膏比硝酸钾牙膏有更大的触觉敏感性改善。总体而言,氟化亚锡牙膏在缓解敏感性方面更胜一筹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of periodontology
Journal of periodontology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
7.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Periodontology publishes articles relevant to the science and practice of periodontics and related areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信