Patient perceptions of the use of e-cigarettes in smoking treatment programs: a qualitative analysis.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Sidney V Rojas, Kelly A Kyanko, Rachel Wisniewski, Katherine O'Connor, Rina Li, Grace Xiang, Mahathi Vojjala, Olivia Wilker, Scott E Sherman, Elizabeth R Stevens
{"title":"Patient perceptions of the use of e-cigarettes in smoking treatment programs: a qualitative analysis.","authors":"Sidney V Rojas, Kelly A Kyanko, Rachel Wisniewski, Katherine O'Connor, Rina Li, Grace Xiang, Mahathi Vojjala, Olivia Wilker, Scott E Sherman, Elizabeth R Stevens","doi":"10.1186/s13722-025-00575-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>E-cigarettes may serve as a safer alternative to combustible cigarettes and may be more effective than currently available nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). Little is known about the perceptions of using e-cigarettes as part of a smoking treatment program. The objective of this study was to gain insight into patient-level factors to consider when developing smoking treatment programs that incorporate e-cigarettes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews with 14 participants enrolled in the e-cigarette treatment arm of a tobacco treatment intervention pilot randomized trial comparing the impact of behavioral counseling paired with e-cigarettes or NRT on smoking outcomes. Participants were prompted to share their experiences with the products and the study overall. Transcripts were coded according to the principles of framework analysis for applied research. Codes were organized into themes using the principles of grounded theory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Themes suggest that while there is an eagerness to try e-cigarettes as a new tool for smoking cessation, there is apprehension regarding what it means to \"quit\" if switching to e-cigarettes. Reflecting on the transitional purpose of e-cigarettes and potential health concerns associated with their use, many participants differentiated between the short-term goal to quit combustible cigarettes and the long-term goal to quit e-cigarettes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Including e-cigarettes as an option in smoking treatment regimens may be an opportunity to re-engage people who smoke who have tried and failed to quit with other forms of treatment. Participants found it challenging to establish what it means to quit cigarettes with e-cigarettes due to addiction and other health concerns. Clear guidelines are needed for integrating e-cigarettes into smoking cessation programs.</p><p><strong>Trial registrations: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04465318.</p>","PeriodicalId":54223,"journal":{"name":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","volume":"20 1","pages":"45"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-025-00575-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: E-cigarettes may serve as a safer alternative to combustible cigarettes and may be more effective than currently available nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). Little is known about the perceptions of using e-cigarettes as part of a smoking treatment program. The objective of this study was to gain insight into patient-level factors to consider when developing smoking treatment programs that incorporate e-cigarettes.

Methods: Qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews with 14 participants enrolled in the e-cigarette treatment arm of a tobacco treatment intervention pilot randomized trial comparing the impact of behavioral counseling paired with e-cigarettes or NRT on smoking outcomes. Participants were prompted to share their experiences with the products and the study overall. Transcripts were coded according to the principles of framework analysis for applied research. Codes were organized into themes using the principles of grounded theory.

Results: Themes suggest that while there is an eagerness to try e-cigarettes as a new tool for smoking cessation, there is apprehension regarding what it means to "quit" if switching to e-cigarettes. Reflecting on the transitional purpose of e-cigarettes and potential health concerns associated with their use, many participants differentiated between the short-term goal to quit combustible cigarettes and the long-term goal to quit e-cigarettes.

Conclusions: Including e-cigarettes as an option in smoking treatment regimens may be an opportunity to re-engage people who smoke who have tried and failed to quit with other forms of treatment. Participants found it challenging to establish what it means to quit cigarettes with e-cigarettes due to addiction and other health concerns. Clear guidelines are needed for integrating e-cigarettes into smoking cessation programs.

Trial registrations: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04465318.

患者对吸烟治疗方案中使用电子烟的看法:定性分析。
背景:电子烟可能是可燃香烟的一种更安全的替代品,可能比目前可用的尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)更有效。人们对使用电子烟作为吸烟治疗方案的一部分的看法知之甚少。这项研究的目的是深入了解在制定包括电子烟在内的吸烟治疗方案时需要考虑的患者层面的因素。方法:对烟草治疗干预试点随机试验中电子烟治疗组的14名参与者进行深度访谈,进行定性分析,比较行为咨询与电子烟或NRT配对对吸烟结果的影响。参与者被要求分享他们使用这些产品和整个研究的经验。根据框架分析的原则对转录本进行编码,用于应用研究。代码使用扎根理论的原则组织成主题。结果:主题表明,虽然人们渴望尝试电子烟作为戒烟的新工具,但人们对转向电子烟意味着“戒烟”感到担忧。考虑到电子烟的过渡目的和与使用电子烟相关的潜在健康问题,许多参与者区分了戒烟可燃香烟的短期目标和戒烟电子烟的长期目标。结论:将电子烟作为吸烟治疗方案的一种选择可能是一个机会,让那些尝试过其他形式治疗但未能戒烟的吸烟者重新参与进来。参与者发现,由于上瘾和其他健康问题,很难确定用电子烟戒烟意味着什么。将电子烟纳入戒烟计划需要明确的指导方针。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04465318。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
64
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Addiction Science & Clinical Practice provides a forum for clinically relevant research and perspectives that contribute to improving the quality of care for people with unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, or other drug use and addictive behaviours across a spectrum of clinical settings. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice accepts articles of clinical relevance related to the prevention and treatment of unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use across the spectrum of clinical settings. Topics of interest address issues related to the following: the spectrum of unhealthy use of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs among the range of affected persons (e.g., not limited by age, race/ethnicity, gender, or sexual orientation); the array of clinical prevention and treatment practices (from health messages, to identification and early intervention, to more extensive interventions including counseling and pharmacotherapy and other management strategies); and identification and management of medical, psychiatric, social, and other health consequences of substance use. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is particularly interested in articles that address how to improve the quality of care for people with unhealthy substance use and related conditions as described in the (US) Institute of Medicine report, Improving the Quality of Healthcare for Mental Health and Substance Use Conditions (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006). Such articles address the quality of care and of health services. Although the journal also welcomes submissions that address these conditions in addiction speciality-treatment settings, the journal is particularly interested in including articles that address unhealthy use outside these settings, including experience with novel models of care and outcomes, and outcomes of research-practice collaborations. Although Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is generally not an outlet for basic science research, we will accept basic science research manuscripts that have clearly described potential clinical relevance and are accessible to audiences outside a narrow laboratory research field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信