Adverse Cutaneous Reactions to Monoclonal Antibodies: Stevens-Johnson Syndrome, Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis, Erythema Multiforme, and Fixed Drug Eruption - A Systematic Review.

Biomedicine hub Pub Date : 2025-04-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000545623
Kenan Kherallah, Imran Ahmad, Anishka Bandara, Jacob Kattoula, Ivan Rodriguez, Scott Worswick
{"title":"Adverse Cutaneous Reactions to Monoclonal Antibodies: Stevens-Johnson Syndrome, Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis, Erythema Multiforme, and Fixed Drug Eruption - A Systematic Review.","authors":"Kenan Kherallah, Imran Ahmad, Anishka Bandara, Jacob Kattoula, Ivan Rodriguez, Scott Worswick","doi":"10.1159/000545623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The therapeutic use of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) has significantly increased since the first mAb was introduced. Despite their therapeutic benefits, mAbs have been accompanied by a rise in adverse effects, affecting various organ systems including the skin. This systematic review consolidates the current literature on the incidence, characteristics, and management of adverse dermatological events (ADEs) post-mAb treatment, focusing on Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), erythema multiforme (EM), and fixed drug eruption (FDE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive PubMed search from 1980 to January 2024 included studies on mAbs causing SJS, TEN, EM, or FDE in humans. Screening was conducted using Covidence, and data were extracted on demographics, mAb details, rash characteristics, and treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the initial 2002 articles, 29 met the inclusion criteria, highlighting 31 cases of ADEs. The onset of these rashes was delayed, often occurring significantly after starting mAb therapy, with a mean onset time considerably longer than that associated with traditional drugs. Additionally, neither patient sex nor concurrent medication use affected the likelihood of developing these reactions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review underscores the prolonged timeline for the onset of ADEs from mAbs, distinct from reactions induced by traditional drugs, aligning with the characteristics of progressive immunotherapy-related mucocutaneous eruption. The lack of correlation with patient sex or concurrent medications reaffirms the inherent risk of mAbs. These findings highlight the need for clinicians to monitor and educate patients about the potential for delayed dermatological reactions from mAb treatment to ensure timely management and better outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":101351,"journal":{"name":"Biomedicine hub","volume":"10 1","pages":"105-115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12121980/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedicine hub","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The therapeutic use of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) has significantly increased since the first mAb was introduced. Despite their therapeutic benefits, mAbs have been accompanied by a rise in adverse effects, affecting various organ systems including the skin. This systematic review consolidates the current literature on the incidence, characteristics, and management of adverse dermatological events (ADEs) post-mAb treatment, focusing on Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), erythema multiforme (EM), and fixed drug eruption (FDE).

Methods: A comprehensive PubMed search from 1980 to January 2024 included studies on mAbs causing SJS, TEN, EM, or FDE in humans. Screening was conducted using Covidence, and data were extracted on demographics, mAb details, rash characteristics, and treatment.

Results: Of the initial 2002 articles, 29 met the inclusion criteria, highlighting 31 cases of ADEs. The onset of these rashes was delayed, often occurring significantly after starting mAb therapy, with a mean onset time considerably longer than that associated with traditional drugs. Additionally, neither patient sex nor concurrent medication use affected the likelihood of developing these reactions.

Conclusion: This review underscores the prolonged timeline for the onset of ADEs from mAbs, distinct from reactions induced by traditional drugs, aligning with the characteristics of progressive immunotherapy-related mucocutaneous eruption. The lack of correlation with patient sex or concurrent medications reaffirms the inherent risk of mAbs. These findings highlight the need for clinicians to monitor and educate patients about the potential for delayed dermatological reactions from mAb treatment to ensure timely management and better outcomes.

单克隆抗体的皮肤不良反应:史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征,中毒性表皮坏死松解,多形性红斑和固定药疹-系统综述。
自第一个单克隆抗体问世以来,单克隆抗体(mAb)的治疗用途显著增加。尽管具有治疗效果,单克隆抗体也伴随着副作用的增加,影响包括皮肤在内的各种器官系统。本系统综述整合了目前关于单抗治疗后皮肤不良事件(ADEs)的发生率、特征和处理的文献,重点是史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征(SJS)、中毒性表皮坏死松解(TEN)、多形性红斑(EM)和固定性药疹(FDE)。方法:综合PubMed检索1980年至2024年1月的研究,包括单克隆抗体引起人类SJS、TEN、EM或FDE的研究。使用covid进行筛查,并提取人口统计学、单抗细节、皮疹特征和治疗方面的数据。结果:在最初的2002篇文章中,29篇符合纳入标准,其中突出31例ADEs。这些皮疹的发病延迟,通常在开始单抗治疗后显著发生,平均发病时间比传统药物相关的发病时间长得多。此外,患者的性别和同时使用药物都不会影响发生这些反应的可能性。结论:本综述强调单克隆抗体引起的ade的发病时间较长,与传统药物引起的反应不同,与进行性免疫治疗相关的皮肤粘膜爆发的特征一致。缺乏与患者性别或同时服用药物的相关性再次证实了单克隆抗体的固有风险。这些发现强调了临床医生需要监测和教育患者单克隆抗体治疗延迟皮肤反应的可能性,以确保及时管理和更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信