Skin checks for potential skin cancers in general practice in Victoria, Australia: the upfront and downstream patterns and costs.

IF 3.4 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
David E Goldsbury, Damien McCarthy, Caroline G Watts, Chi So, Olivia Wawryk, Chris Kearney, Gillian Reyes-Marcelino, Kirstie McLoughlin, Jon Emery, Anne E Cust
{"title":"Skin checks for potential skin cancers in general practice in Victoria, Australia: the upfront and downstream patterns and costs.","authors":"David E Goldsbury, Damien McCarthy, Caroline G Watts, Chi So, Olivia Wawryk, Chris Kearney, Gillian Reyes-Marcelino, Kirstie McLoughlin, Jon Emery, Anne E Cust","doi":"10.1071/PU24003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives To describe patterns of skin checks for potential skin cancers in general practice and subsequent skin-related healthcare, and the associated costs. Study type Retrospective longitudinal health record linkage. Methods Patient encounters between 2010 and 2017 were extracted from clinical information systems at 73 general practice sites in Victoria, Australia, including Medicare billing information, from the MedicineInsight primary care dataset. The main outcomes were skin checks, skin-related healthcare up to 3 months after the skin check, and health system costs. Results There were 59 046 skin check encounters (0.7% of all general practice encounters) identified for 40 014 people with a median age of 52 years (interquartile range 36-67). Of these people, 26% had multiple skin checks. Of the subsequent skin checks, 28% were within 3 months of the initial skin check and 15% were after > 2 years. There was subsequent skin-related healthcare ≤ 3 months after 20% of all skin checks: 8% had a skin biopsy, 11% had a skin excision (of which 2% indicated a melanoma diagnosis, 29% keratinocyte carcinoma and 68% benign or other skin lesion), 2% had skin-related medicine prescribed and 5% had other skin-related treatment such as cryotherapy (not mutually exclusive). Ninety per cent of skin checks were billed as general practitioner (GP) consultations, including 65% as GP consultations of Conclusions Skin checks for potential skin cancers occur frequently in Australian general practice and accumulate substantial health system costs, with one in five skin checks resulting in subsequent treatment. This study adds to scarce real-world skin check and cost data in Australia.</p>","PeriodicalId":45898,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Research & Practice","volume":"35 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PU24003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives To describe patterns of skin checks for potential skin cancers in general practice and subsequent skin-related healthcare, and the associated costs. Study type Retrospective longitudinal health record linkage. Methods Patient encounters between 2010 and 2017 were extracted from clinical information systems at 73 general practice sites in Victoria, Australia, including Medicare billing information, from the MedicineInsight primary care dataset. The main outcomes were skin checks, skin-related healthcare up to 3 months after the skin check, and health system costs. Results There were 59 046 skin check encounters (0.7% of all general practice encounters) identified for 40 014 people with a median age of 52 years (interquartile range 36-67). Of these people, 26% had multiple skin checks. Of the subsequent skin checks, 28% were within 3 months of the initial skin check and 15% were after > 2 years. There was subsequent skin-related healthcare ≤ 3 months after 20% of all skin checks: 8% had a skin biopsy, 11% had a skin excision (of which 2% indicated a melanoma diagnosis, 29% keratinocyte carcinoma and 68% benign or other skin lesion), 2% had skin-related medicine prescribed and 5% had other skin-related treatment such as cryotherapy (not mutually exclusive). Ninety per cent of skin checks were billed as general practitioner (GP) consultations, including 65% as GP consultations of Conclusions Skin checks for potential skin cancers occur frequently in Australian general practice and accumulate substantial health system costs, with one in five skin checks resulting in subsequent treatment. This study adds to scarce real-world skin check and cost data in Australia.

在澳大利亚维多利亚州的一般实践中,潜在皮肤癌的皮肤检查:前期和后期模式和成本。
目的描述全科医生和随后的皮肤相关保健中潜在皮肤癌的皮肤检查模式,以及相关费用。研究类型回顾性纵向健康记录关联。方法从澳大利亚维多利亚州73个全科诊所的临床信息系统中提取2010年至2017年的患者就诊情况,包括来自MedicineInsight初级保健数据集的医疗保险计费信息。主要结果为皮肤检查、皮肤检查后3个月的皮肤相关保健和卫生系统费用。结果40 014例患者中有59 046例皮肤检查(占全科就诊的0.7%),中位年龄为52岁(四分位数范围为36-67岁)。在这些人中,26%的人进行了多次皮肤检查。在随后的皮肤检查中,28%是在首次皮肤检查的3个月内进行的,15%是在2年后进行的。在所有皮肤检查中,有20%的患者在3个月内接受了皮肤相关的医疗保健:8%进行了皮肤活检,11%进行了皮肤切除术(其中2%诊断为黑色素瘤,29%为角化细胞癌,68%为良性或其他皮肤病变),2%开具了皮肤相关药物处方,5%接受了其他皮肤相关治疗,如冷冻疗法(不相互排斥)。90%的皮肤检查被称为全科医生(GP)咨询,其中65%的人被称为全科医生咨询。结论:针对潜在皮肤癌的皮肤检查在澳大利亚的全科医生中经常发生,并积累了大量的卫生系统成本,五分之一的皮肤检查导致后续治疗。这项研究补充了澳大利亚稀缺的真实皮肤检查和成本数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health Research & Practice
Public Health Research & Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Public Health Research & Practice is an open-access, quarterly, online journal with a strong focus on the connection between research, policy and practice. It publishes innovative, high-quality papers that inform public health policy and practice, paying particular attention to innovations, data and perspectives from policy and practice. The journal is published by the Sax Institute, a national leader in promoting the use of research evidence in health policy. Formerly known as The NSW Public Health Bulletin, the journal has a long history. It was published by the NSW Ministry of Health for nearly a quarter of a century. Responsibility for its publication transferred to the Sax Institute in 2014, and the journal receives guidance from an expert editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信