Evaluation of the Efficacy of Different Agents on Decontamination of Dental Implant Surface: An In Vitro Study.

Q3 Dentistry
Karishma Dash, Aradhana Rathod, Monisha V Sundaran, Priya Patel, Mansi Nautiyal, Muzammil M Ahmed
{"title":"Evaluation of the Efficacy of Different Agents on Decontamination of Dental Implant Surface: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study.","authors":"Karishma Dash, Aradhana Rathod, Monisha V Sundaran, Priya Patel, Mansi Nautiyal, Muzammil M Ahmed","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The current investigation aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of two different agents in decontaminating the surface of dental implants.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>For this investigation, a total of 45 dental implants were used. In a solution of 40% brain heart infusion (BHI) and 60% entire unstimulated saliva, biofilms were grown on 45 dental implants which were divided into 3 decontamination groups at random (<i>n</i> = 15): Group I: Control group; group II: Ozonated water; group III: Chlorhexidine group. Processed samples were examined using Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with a backscattered electron detector and a 25 kV image resolution. Data was gathered and analyzed statistically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximum biofilms removed in the 2% chlorhexidine group was 1.24 ± 0.10 followed by the ozonated water group was 1.40 ± 0.01 and the control group was 2.04 ± 0.16. And there was a statistically significant difference found between the three groups. On pairwise comparison, a statistically significant difference was found between the control group vs ozonated water and the control group vs 2% chlorhexidine groups. There was no significant difference found between ozonated water vs 2% chlorhexidine groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study concluded that both of the decontamination agents employed were successful in removing biofilm from the implant surface. But 2% chlorhexidine group is slightly superior to the ozonated water group in removing biofilm from the implant surface.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The most crucial steps in treating peri-implantitis are removing polymicrobial biofilm and decontaminating the implant surface. The soft and hard tissues around dental implants are impacted by an inflammatory reaction known as peri-implantitis. At the peri-implant crevice level, the implant and abutment surface are colonized by an aggressive polymicrobial biofilm, so the removal of biofilm is important to prevent the condition. How to cite this article: Dash K, Rathod A, Sundaran MV, <i>et al.</i> Evaluation of the Efficacy of Different Agents on Decontamination of Dental Implant Surface: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(2):151-154.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"26 2","pages":"151-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The current investigation aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of two different agents in decontaminating the surface of dental implants.

Materials and methods: For this investigation, a total of 45 dental implants were used. In a solution of 40% brain heart infusion (BHI) and 60% entire unstimulated saliva, biofilms were grown on 45 dental implants which were divided into 3 decontamination groups at random (n = 15): Group I: Control group; group II: Ozonated water; group III: Chlorhexidine group. Processed samples were examined using Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with a backscattered electron detector and a 25 kV image resolution. Data was gathered and analyzed statistically.

Results: The maximum biofilms removed in the 2% chlorhexidine group was 1.24 ± 0.10 followed by the ozonated water group was 1.40 ± 0.01 and the control group was 2.04 ± 0.16. And there was a statistically significant difference found between the three groups. On pairwise comparison, a statistically significant difference was found between the control group vs ozonated water and the control group vs 2% chlorhexidine groups. There was no significant difference found between ozonated water vs 2% chlorhexidine groups.

Conclusion: The present study concluded that both of the decontamination agents employed were successful in removing biofilm from the implant surface. But 2% chlorhexidine group is slightly superior to the ozonated water group in removing biofilm from the implant surface.

Clinical significance: The most crucial steps in treating peri-implantitis are removing polymicrobial biofilm and decontaminating the implant surface. The soft and hard tissues around dental implants are impacted by an inflammatory reaction known as peri-implantitis. At the peri-implant crevice level, the implant and abutment surface are colonized by an aggressive polymicrobial biofilm, so the removal of biofilm is important to prevent the condition. How to cite this article: Dash K, Rathod A, Sundaran MV, et al. Evaluation of the Efficacy of Different Agents on Decontamination of Dental Implant Surface: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(2):151-154.

不同药物对种植体表面去污效果的体外研究。
背景:本研究旨在评价两种不同的药物对种植体表面去污的效果。材料与方法:本研究共使用种植体45颗。在40%脑心灌注液(BHI)和60%全未刺激唾液的溶液中,在45颗种植体上生长生物膜,随机分为3个去污组(n = 15):第一组:对照组;第二组:臭氧化水;第三组:氯己定组。处理后的样品使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)与背散射电子探测器和25千伏的图像分辨率进行检查。收集数据并进行统计分析。结果:2%氯己定组最大生物膜去除率为1.24±0.10,其次为臭氧化水组(1.40±0.01),对照组(2.04±0.16)。这三组之间有统计学上的显著差异。两两比较,对照组与臭氧化水组、对照组与2%氯己定组差异有统计学意义。臭氧化水与2%氯己定组之间无显著差异。结论:两种去污剂均能有效去除种植体表面的生物膜。但2%氯己定组去除种植体表面生物膜的效果略优于臭氧化水组。临床意义:治疗种植体周围炎最关键的步骤是去除多微生物生物膜和清除种植体表面的污染。种植体周围的软硬组织会受到一种叫做种植体周围炎的炎症反应的影响。在种植体周围的缝隙水平,种植体和基台表面被侵略性的多微生物生物膜定植,因此去除生物膜对预防这种情况很重要。如何引用本文:Dash K, Rathod A, Sundaran MV等。不同药物对种植体表面去污效果的体外研究。[J]现代医学学报,2015;26(2):151-154。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (JCDP), is a peer-reviewed, open access MEDLINE indexed journal. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.thejcdp.com. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents. Articles with clinical relevance will be given preference for publication. The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, rare and novel case reports, and clinical techniques. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of dentistry i.e., conservative dentistry and endodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthodontics, oral medicine and radiology, oral pathology, oral surgery, orodental diseases, pediatric dentistry, implantology, periodontics, clinical aspects of public health dentistry, and prosthodontics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信