{"title":"Effect of Yttria Percentage and Different Surface Treatments on the Flexural Strength of Zirconia Materials: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study.","authors":"Nagy M Omar, Mohamed F Aldamaty, Tamer E Shokry","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This <i>in vitro</i> study aimed to investigate the effect of yttria and different surface treatments on the biaxial flexural strength of zirconia materials.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Seventy-two circular-shaped specimens, with a dimension of 13 × 1 mm<sup>2</sup>, were milled from three presintered zirconia (24 each). Based on the surface treatment, the specimens were divided into four subgroups (<i>n</i> = 6): Air-borne particle abrasion (AB); silica coating (SC); sulfuric acid etching (SA); and one group (<i>n</i> = 6) which received no treatment (C). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) were used. Biaxial flexural strength was measured using a universal testing machine. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was utilized to analyze the impact of surface treatment, zirconia type, and their interactions on mean flexural strength, followed by Bonferroni's <i>post-hoc</i> test for pair-wise comparisons when ANOVA results were significant. A significant threshold of <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05 was set.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Yttria multilayered zirconia (YML) demonstrated the greatest average flexural strength, followed by super translucent zirconia (STML) and ultratranslucent zirconia (UTML). The YML with SC has the highest mean flexural strength followed by AB and SA, with no significant difference. While for STML, there was no variation in the flexural strength of surface treatments. The UTML showed that SA has the maximum average flexural strength. Control surface treatment showed the lowest mean flexural strength. The XRD examination revealed the absence of a monoclinic phase in STML or UTML, but it was found with YML.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For YML, silica coating significantly enhanced biaxial flexural strength compared with airborne-particle abrasion and sulfuric acid treatments. The monoclinic phase was detected in YML after surface treatment.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The selection of zirconia materials and surface treatments should be specialized to optimize mechanical strength while considering the intended clinical application. How to cite this article: Omar NM, Aldamaty MF, Shokry TE. Effect of Yttria Percentage and Different Surface Treatments on the Flexural Strength of Zirconia Materials: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(2):184-191.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"26 2","pages":"184-191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: This in vitro study aimed to investigate the effect of yttria and different surface treatments on the biaxial flexural strength of zirconia materials.
Materials and methods: Seventy-two circular-shaped specimens, with a dimension of 13 × 1 mm2, were milled from three presintered zirconia (24 each). Based on the surface treatment, the specimens were divided into four subgroups (n = 6): Air-borne particle abrasion (AB); silica coating (SC); sulfuric acid etching (SA); and one group (n = 6) which received no treatment (C). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) were used. Biaxial flexural strength was measured using a universal testing machine. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was utilized to analyze the impact of surface treatment, zirconia type, and their interactions on mean flexural strength, followed by Bonferroni's post-hoc test for pair-wise comparisons when ANOVA results were significant. A significant threshold of p ≤ 0.05 was set.
Results: Yttria multilayered zirconia (YML) demonstrated the greatest average flexural strength, followed by super translucent zirconia (STML) and ultratranslucent zirconia (UTML). The YML with SC has the highest mean flexural strength followed by AB and SA, with no significant difference. While for STML, there was no variation in the flexural strength of surface treatments. The UTML showed that SA has the maximum average flexural strength. Control surface treatment showed the lowest mean flexural strength. The XRD examination revealed the absence of a monoclinic phase in STML or UTML, but it was found with YML.
Conclusion: For YML, silica coating significantly enhanced biaxial flexural strength compared with airborne-particle abrasion and sulfuric acid treatments. The monoclinic phase was detected in YML after surface treatment.
Clinical significance: The selection of zirconia materials and surface treatments should be specialized to optimize mechanical strength while considering the intended clinical application. How to cite this article: Omar NM, Aldamaty MF, Shokry TE. Effect of Yttria Percentage and Different Surface Treatments on the Flexural Strength of Zirconia Materials: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(2):184-191.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (JCDP), is a peer-reviewed, open access MEDLINE indexed journal. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.thejcdp.com. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents. Articles with clinical relevance will be given preference for publication. The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, rare and novel case reports, and clinical techniques. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of dentistry i.e., conservative dentistry and endodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthodontics, oral medicine and radiology, oral pathology, oral surgery, orodental diseases, pediatric dentistry, implantology, periodontics, clinical aspects of public health dentistry, and prosthodontics.