Study of the Spectrum of Treatable Dementias: Insights from a Large South Asian Cohort (TREAT-Dem Study).

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
M M Samim, Faheem Arshad, Pallavi N Sastry, B S Keerthana, Aparna Somaraj, Sarath Govindaraj, Sandeep S Kumar, Priya Treesa Thomas, Subasree Ramakrishnan, Anita Mahadevan, Suvarna Alladi
{"title":"Study of the Spectrum of Treatable Dementias: Insights from a Large South Asian Cohort (TREAT-Dem Study).","authors":"M M Samim, Faheem Arshad, Pallavi N Sastry, B S Keerthana, Aparna Somaraj, Sarath Govindaraj, Sandeep S Kumar, Priya Treesa Thomas, Subasree Ramakrishnan, Anita Mahadevan, Suvarna Alladi","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2025.10133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Dementia affects millions globally, with a subset of cases potentially reversible. This study evaluates the incidence, clinical markers and treatment outcomes of reversible dementias (ReDem).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This retrospective study included 370 ReDem cases from 1810 dementia patients. The ReDem cohort was split into potentially reversible dementias (PRD) and dual etiology (DE) groups. PRD encompassed secondary, potentially treatable dementia conditions, while DE included primary degenerative dementia (DD) with ≥1 uncontrolled comorbidity or new disease that worsened symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ReDem cases comprised 20.4% (<i>n</i> = 370 out of 1810) of dementia patients, with ReDem patients being younger (mean 56.2 vs. 61.9 years, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and exhibiting shorter illness durations than DD patients (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Key red flags, including young age (<45 years) at onset (DD = 8.6% vs. ReDem = 18.1%), fluctuation in symptoms (DD = 3.4% vs. ReDem = 11.6%), rapid cognitive decline (DD = 6.9% vs. ReDem = 18.4), high-risk exposures (DD = 0.1% vs. ReDem = 0.8%), high-risk behavior (DD = 0.1% vs. ReDem = 2.4%) and incongruent neuropsychological findings(DD = 1.0% vs. 12.7%), were significantly more frequent in ReDem cases (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Odds increased with each red flag present (≥1: OR = 5.94; ≥2: OR = 20.69; ≥3: OR = 25.14, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Reversible etiologies included immune (20.0%), neuroinfectious (6.6%), psychiatric (7.6%), nutritional/metabolic (10.5%), neurosurgical (14.6%) and other causes (12.2%). Of the 41% (152/370) followed, 19 expired, 63.9% (85/133) reported subjective improvement, and 31.6% (42/133) showed clinical dementia rating improvement.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>This large-scale study underscores the importance of comprehensive diagnostic evaluations for ReDem. Identifying and treating reversible conditions and comorbidities in DD can improve patient outcomes, emphasizing the need for thorough evaluations in memory clinics and targeted interventions in dementia care.</p>","PeriodicalId":56134,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2025.10133","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Dementia affects millions globally, with a subset of cases potentially reversible. This study evaluates the incidence, clinical markers and treatment outcomes of reversible dementias (ReDem).

Method: This retrospective study included 370 ReDem cases from 1810 dementia patients. The ReDem cohort was split into potentially reversible dementias (PRD) and dual etiology (DE) groups. PRD encompassed secondary, potentially treatable dementia conditions, while DE included primary degenerative dementia (DD) with ≥1 uncontrolled comorbidity or new disease that worsened symptoms.

Results: ReDem cases comprised 20.4% (n = 370 out of 1810) of dementia patients, with ReDem patients being younger (mean 56.2 vs. 61.9 years, p < 0.001) and exhibiting shorter illness durations than DD patients (p < 0.001). Key red flags, including young age (<45 years) at onset (DD = 8.6% vs. ReDem = 18.1%), fluctuation in symptoms (DD = 3.4% vs. ReDem = 11.6%), rapid cognitive decline (DD = 6.9% vs. ReDem = 18.4), high-risk exposures (DD = 0.1% vs. ReDem = 0.8%), high-risk behavior (DD = 0.1% vs. ReDem = 2.4%) and incongruent neuropsychological findings(DD = 1.0% vs. 12.7%), were significantly more frequent in ReDem cases (p < 0.05). Odds increased with each red flag present (≥1: OR = 5.94; ≥2: OR = 20.69; ≥3: OR = 25.14, p < 0.05). Reversible etiologies included immune (20.0%), neuroinfectious (6.6%), psychiatric (7.6%), nutritional/metabolic (10.5%), neurosurgical (14.6%) and other causes (12.2%). Of the 41% (152/370) followed, 19 expired, 63.9% (85/133) reported subjective improvement, and 31.6% (42/133) showed clinical dementia rating improvement.

Discussion and conclusion: This large-scale study underscores the importance of comprehensive diagnostic evaluations for ReDem. Identifying and treating reversible conditions and comorbidities in DD can improve patient outcomes, emphasizing the need for thorough evaluations in memory clinics and targeted interventions in dementia care.

可治疗痴呆谱系的研究:来自南亚大型队列的见解(TREAT-Dem研究)。
背景和目的:痴呆症影响着全球数百万人,其中一部分病例可能是可逆的。本研究评估可逆性痴呆(ReDem)的发病率、临床指标和治疗结果。方法:对1810例痴呆患者中的370例ReDem进行回顾性研究。ReDem队列被分为潜在可逆性痴呆(PRD)组和双重病因组(DE)。PRD包括继发性、潜在可治疗的痴呆,而DE包括原发性退行性痴呆(DD),伴有≥1个未控制的合并症或新发疾病,使症状恶化。结果:ReDem患者占痴呆患者的20.4% (n = 370 / 1810), ReDem患者年龄较小(平均56.2岁对61.9岁,p < 0.001),病程短于DD患者(p < 0.001)。关键的危险信号,包括年轻(p < 0.05)。每出现一个危险信号,风险增加(≥1:OR = 5.94;≥2:或= 20.69;≥3:OR = 25.14, p < 0.05)。可逆病因包括免疫(20.0%)、神经感染性(6.6%)、精神病学(7.6%)、营养/代谢(10.5%)、神经外科(14.6%)和其他原因(12.2%)。在随访的41%(152/370)患者中,19人死亡,63.9%(85/133)患者主观改善,31.6%(42/133)患者临床痴呆评分改善。讨论与结论:这项大规模研究强调了ReDem综合诊断评估的重要性。识别和治疗DD的可逆性疾病和合并症可以改善患者的预后,强调需要在记忆诊所进行全面评估,并在痴呆症护理中进行有针对性的干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.30%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences is the official publication of the four member societies of the Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation -- Canadian Neurological Society (CNS), Canadian Association of Child Neurology (CACN), Canadian Neurosurgical Society (CNSS), Canadian Society of Clinical Neurophysiologists (CSCN). The Journal is a widely circulated internationally recognized medical journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles. The Journal is published in January, March, May, July, September, and November in an online only format. The first Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences (the Journal) was published in 1974 in Winnipeg. In 1981, the Journal became the official publication of the member societies of the CNSF.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信