Alika Kanaeva , Ekaterina Vodiasova , Vo Thi Ha , Viktoria Uppe , Evgenija Dmitrieva
{"title":"Calicotyle confusa n. sp. (Monogenea: Monocotylidae) from Okamejei boesemani (Elasmobranchii) off Vietnam","authors":"Alika Kanaeva , Ekaterina Vodiasova , Vo Thi Ha , Viktoria Uppe , Evgenija Dmitrieva","doi":"10.1016/j.parint.2025.103100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Monogeneans of the genus <em>Calicotyle</em> Diesing, 1850 were found in the cloaca of the Arafura skate <em>Okamejei boesemani</em> (Ishihara, 1987) from the coastal waters of Vietnam. A partial 28S rDNA sequence (822 bp) was obtained from the collected specimen and deposited in GenBank (accession number PP868284). Comparative analysis with the available 28S rDNA sequences of <em>Calicotyle</em> spp. in the NCBI database revealed the smallest p-distances with the <em>C. kroyeri</em> Diesing, 1850 species complex. However, the genetic distance between the obtained sequence and <em>C. kroyeri</em> (AF279746) from its type host, <em>Amblyraja radiata</em> (Donovan, 1808), and type locality (the North Sea), was 4.2 %, while distances from all <em>C. kroyeri</em> isolates from the Atlantic Ocean (AF279744 – AF279747) ranged from 4.2 to 5.9 %. Based on these results, a new species, <em>C. confusa</em> n. sp., was proposed. Morphologically, <em>C. confusa</em> n. sp. exhibits smaller, albeit overlapping, dimensions compared to <em>C. kroyeri</em> specimens from the North Atlantic. However, no significant differences were observed between the two species in taxonomically important characters. Further morphological studies of <em>C. kroyeri</em> from its type host, as well as from other hosts and regions, are required to identify potential diagnostic characters distinguishing it from <em>C. confusa</em> n. sp.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19983,"journal":{"name":"Parasitology International","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 103100"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parasitology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138357692500073X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Monogeneans of the genus Calicotyle Diesing, 1850 were found in the cloaca of the Arafura skate Okamejei boesemani (Ishihara, 1987) from the coastal waters of Vietnam. A partial 28S rDNA sequence (822 bp) was obtained from the collected specimen and deposited in GenBank (accession number PP868284). Comparative analysis with the available 28S rDNA sequences of Calicotyle spp. in the NCBI database revealed the smallest p-distances with the C. kroyeri Diesing, 1850 species complex. However, the genetic distance between the obtained sequence and C. kroyeri (AF279746) from its type host, Amblyraja radiata (Donovan, 1808), and type locality (the North Sea), was 4.2 %, while distances from all C. kroyeri isolates from the Atlantic Ocean (AF279744 – AF279747) ranged from 4.2 to 5.9 %. Based on these results, a new species, C. confusa n. sp., was proposed. Morphologically, C. confusa n. sp. exhibits smaller, albeit overlapping, dimensions compared to C. kroyeri specimens from the North Atlantic. However, no significant differences were observed between the two species in taxonomically important characters. Further morphological studies of C. kroyeri from its type host, as well as from other hosts and regions, are required to identify potential diagnostic characters distinguishing it from C. confusa n. sp.
期刊介绍:
Parasitology International provides a medium for rapid, carefully reviewed publications in the field of human and animal parasitology. Original papers, rapid communications, and original case reports from all geographical areas and covering all parasitological disciplines, including structure, immunology, cell biology, biochemistry, molecular biology, and systematics, may be submitted. Reviews on recent developments are invited regularly, but suggestions in this respect are welcome. Letters to the Editor commenting on any aspect of the Journal are also welcome.