Observer Perspective Memories May Be a Distinct Type of Memory Distortion.

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Karen L Siedlecki, Francesca B Falzarano
{"title":"Observer Perspective Memories May Be a Distinct Type of Memory Distortion.","authors":"Karen L Siedlecki, Francesca B Falzarano","doi":"10.1037/mac0000165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Variations in visual perspective in autobiographical memory recall exemplify memory as a malleable and dynamic construct. Research examining variations in vantage point during autobiographical memory retrieval has identified a distinction between first-person (recalling a memory through one's own eyes) and third-person (recalling a memory as an observer) perspectives. In her target article, St. Jacques (2024) reviews the lack of consensus regarding whether memories retrieved from a third-person perspective are considered <i>false memories</i> versus <i>memory distortions</i>. In this commentary, we begin with a brief discussion highlighting the distinction between false and distorted memories. We then present findings derived from secondary data analyses examining the relationship between visual perspective and memory distortions on two different \"false memory\" measures in (<i>N</i> = 112) participants. Study findings underscore that recalling autobiographical memories with an observer perspective may be a distinct type of memory distortion.</p>","PeriodicalId":47622,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition","volume":"13 1","pages":"26-29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12121988/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000165","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Variations in visual perspective in autobiographical memory recall exemplify memory as a malleable and dynamic construct. Research examining variations in vantage point during autobiographical memory retrieval has identified a distinction between first-person (recalling a memory through one's own eyes) and third-person (recalling a memory as an observer) perspectives. In her target article, St. Jacques (2024) reviews the lack of consensus regarding whether memories retrieved from a third-person perspective are considered false memories versus memory distortions. In this commentary, we begin with a brief discussion highlighting the distinction between false and distorted memories. We then present findings derived from secondary data analyses examining the relationship between visual perspective and memory distortions on two different "false memory" measures in (N = 112) participants. Study findings underscore that recalling autobiographical memories with an observer perspective may be a distinct type of memory distortion.

观察者视角记忆可能是一种独特的记忆扭曲类型。
自传式记忆中视觉视角的变化说明记忆是一种可塑的动态结构。一项研究考察了在自传式记忆提取过程中有利位置的变化,发现了第一人称(通过自己的眼睛回忆记忆)和第三人称(作为观察者回忆记忆)视角之间的区别。在她的目标文章中,St. Jacques(2024)回顾了关于从第三人称角度获取的记忆是否被认为是错误记忆还是记忆扭曲缺乏共识。在这篇评论中,我们首先简要讨论一下错误记忆和扭曲记忆的区别。然后,我们提出了从二次数据分析得出的结果,研究了视觉视角和记忆扭曲之间的关系,在两种不同的“错误记忆”测量中(N = 112)参与者。研究结果强调,以观察者的视角回忆自传式记忆可能是一种独特的记忆扭曲。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
119
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信