A Modified Method for Measuring Pressure Drop in Non-medical Face Masks with Automated Data Acquisition and Analysis.

Alexander Herman, Daniel Porter, Dana Rottach, Suvajyoti Guha
{"title":"A Modified Method for Measuring Pressure Drop in Non-medical Face Masks with Automated Data Acquisition and Analysis.","authors":"Alexander Herman, Daniel Porter, Dana Rottach, Suvajyoti Guha","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-medical face masks, such as face coverings donned by the general population play an important role in reducing transmission of respiratory pathogens. Pressure drop or breathability of such masks is an important attribute especially with the advent of new standards such as ASTM F3502-21 that have specified pressure drop limits for general use of face coverings. Although several standards are available that discuss pressure drop measurement techniques, the methodologies reported are typically complex or are part of more sophisticated and expensive instruments. Thus, the applicability of such methods is often limited to medical device manufacturers.</p><p><strong>Objective and methods: </strong>This manuscript adapts from the pressure drop measurements proposed in British Standard EN 14683:2019 and describes a methodology to create a simple 3D printed model of a pressure rig for measuring the breathing resistance across non-medical face masks. The method also enables real time pressure drop data acquisition and analysis of multiple samples or batches using Python and MATLAB scripts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We performed a validation study by comparing the pressure drop obtained for one brand of respirators with our set up and compared it with data obtained by traditional means by CDC. An unpaired two-tailed student t-test (n=3) between the two means implied no statistically significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The method we have developed can be easily implemented at community levels for characterizing the breathability of non-medical grade face masks.</p>","PeriodicalId":73984,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Society for Respiratory Protection","volume":"38 2","pages":"42-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9126268/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Society for Respiratory Protection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Non-medical face masks, such as face coverings donned by the general population play an important role in reducing transmission of respiratory pathogens. Pressure drop or breathability of such masks is an important attribute especially with the advent of new standards such as ASTM F3502-21 that have specified pressure drop limits for general use of face coverings. Although several standards are available that discuss pressure drop measurement techniques, the methodologies reported are typically complex or are part of more sophisticated and expensive instruments. Thus, the applicability of such methods is often limited to medical device manufacturers.

Objective and methods: This manuscript adapts from the pressure drop measurements proposed in British Standard EN 14683:2019 and describes a methodology to create a simple 3D printed model of a pressure rig for measuring the breathing resistance across non-medical face masks. The method also enables real time pressure drop data acquisition and analysis of multiple samples or batches using Python and MATLAB scripts.

Results: We performed a validation study by comparing the pressure drop obtained for one brand of respirators with our set up and compared it with data obtained by traditional means by CDC. An unpaired two-tailed student t-test (n=3) between the two means implied no statistically significant difference.

Conclusion: The method we have developed can be easily implemented at community levels for characterizing the breathability of non-medical grade face masks.

一种基于自动数据采集与分析的非医用口罩压降测量改进方法。
背景:非医用口罩,如普通人群佩戴的面罩,在减少呼吸道病原体传播方面发挥着重要作用。这种口罩的压降或透气性是一个重要的属性,特别是随着ASTM F3502-21等新标准的出现,这些标准规定了一般使用面罩的压降限制。虽然有几个标准讨论了压降测量技术,但所报告的方法通常很复杂,或者是更复杂和昂贵的仪器的一部分。因此,这种方法的适用性通常仅限于医疗设备制造商。目的和方法:本文改编自英国标准EN 14683:2019中提出的压降测量,并描述了一种创建简单的3D打印压力装置模型的方法,用于测量非医用口罩的呼吸阻力。该方法还可以使用Python和MATLAB脚本对多个样品或批次进行实时压降数据采集和分析。结果:我们将某品牌呼吸器的压降与我们的装置进行了比较,并将其与CDC传统方法获得的数据进行了比较,进行了验证性研究。两个平均值之间的非配对双尾学生t检验(n=3)表明无统计学显著差异。结论:所建立的非医用口罩透气性评价方法易于在社区实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信