Noelia Madriz-Montalván, Marine Ortiz-Magdaleno, Norma Verónica Zavala-Alonso, José Elías Pérez-López, Gregorio Sánchez-Balderas, Diana María Escobar-García, Erika Lourdes Silva-Benítez, Gabriel Fernando Romo-Ramírez
{"title":"Effect of simulated gastric acid on the surface degradation of dental ceramics.","authors":"Noelia Madriz-Montalván, Marine Ortiz-Magdaleno, Norma Verónica Zavala-Alonso, José Elías Pérez-López, Gregorio Sánchez-Balderas, Diana María Escobar-García, Erika Lourdes Silva-Benítez, Gabriel Fernando Romo-Ramírez","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the effect in vitro of simulated gastric acid solution on the roughness, microhardness and micro-structural topography surface of two dental ceramics: lithium disilicate glass-ceramic and monolithic zirconium dioxide (ZrO<sub>2</sub>) at baseline and after different immersion time.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Lithium disilicate and ZrO<sub>2</sub>glass-ceramic discs were fabricated (40 of each one) and was evaluated under microscope the roughness (Atomic force microscopy), microhardness (Vickers hardness tester) and micro-structural topography surface (Scanning electron microscopy) before immersion (baseline) and after three periods of immersion: 8 h 25 min, 46 h 2.5 min and 92 h 5 min in simulated gastric acid solution of hydrochloric acid (HCl, 0.06 M, pH 1.2) at 37 ºC. The ceramics were compared over time with a repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistically significant changes (P<.05) were found in the microhardness values between both ceramics, which decreased after all times points of immersion in simulated gastric acid solution, ZrO<sub>2</sub>showed higher microhardness mean values (P<.05) but lithium disilicate showed significant changes (P <.05) in the surface microhardness at baseline versus the three immersion times. Lithium disilicate had higher roughness values than ZrO<sub>2</sub>(P<.05), which increased after 8 h 25 min of immersion; however, after 46 h 2.5 min and 92 h 5 min of immersion, the roughness decreased. More microporosities were observed in the lithium disilicate surface than with ZrO<sub>2</sub>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The simulated gastric acid solution of HCl affected the roughness, microhardness and micro-structural topography surface of both lithium disilicate and ZrO<sub>2</sub>, but greater surface degradation was presented lithium disilicate.</p>","PeriodicalId":94215,"journal":{"name":"Stomatologija","volume":"26 2","pages":"37-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stomatologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effect in vitro of simulated gastric acid solution on the roughness, microhardness and micro-structural topography surface of two dental ceramics: lithium disilicate glass-ceramic and monolithic zirconium dioxide (ZrO2) at baseline and after different immersion time.
Materials and methods: Lithium disilicate and ZrO2glass-ceramic discs were fabricated (40 of each one) and was evaluated under microscope the roughness (Atomic force microscopy), microhardness (Vickers hardness tester) and micro-structural topography surface (Scanning electron microscopy) before immersion (baseline) and after three periods of immersion: 8 h 25 min, 46 h 2.5 min and 92 h 5 min in simulated gastric acid solution of hydrochloric acid (HCl, 0.06 M, pH 1.2) at 37 ºC. The ceramics were compared over time with a repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Results: Statistically significant changes (P<.05) were found in the microhardness values between both ceramics, which decreased after all times points of immersion in simulated gastric acid solution, ZrO2showed higher microhardness mean values (P<.05) but lithium disilicate showed significant changes (P <.05) in the surface microhardness at baseline versus the three immersion times. Lithium disilicate had higher roughness values than ZrO2(P<.05), which increased after 8 h 25 min of immersion; however, after 46 h 2.5 min and 92 h 5 min of immersion, the roughness decreased. More microporosities were observed in the lithium disilicate surface than with ZrO2.
Conclusion: The simulated gastric acid solution of HCl affected the roughness, microhardness and micro-structural topography surface of both lithium disilicate and ZrO2, but greater surface degradation was presented lithium disilicate.
目的:比较体外模拟胃酸溶液对二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷和单片二氧化锆(ZrO2)两种牙科陶瓷在基线和不同浸泡时间下的粗糙度、显微硬度和微观结构形貌的影响。材料与方法:制作二硅酸锂和zro2玻璃陶瓷片(各40个),在37℃的盐酸(HCl, 0.06 M, pH 1.2)模拟胃酸溶液中浸泡前(基线)和浸泡8 h 25 min、46 h 2.5 min和92 h 5 min后,在显微镜下评估粗糙度(原子力显微镜)、显微硬度(维氏硬度计)和微观结构形貌(扫描电镜)。用重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)比较不同时间的陶瓷。结果:变化有统计学意义(P2),显微硬度平均值(P2)升高。结论:HCl模拟胃酸溶液对二硅酸锂和ZrO2表面粗糙度、显微硬度和微观结构形貌均有影响,但二硅酸锂的表面降解更大。