Introduction of a Toric Intraocular Lens to a Non-Refractive Cataract Practice: Challenges and Outcomes.

Clare Kirwan, John M Nolan, Jim Stack, Ian Dooley, Johnny Moore, Tara Cb Moore, Stephen Beatty
{"title":"Introduction of a Toric Intraocular Lens to a Non-Refractive Cataract Practice: Challenges and Outcomes.","authors":"Clare Kirwan, John M Nolan, Jim Stack, Ian Dooley, Johnny Moore, Tara Cb Moore, Stephen Beatty","doi":"10.23937/2378-346x/1410056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify challenges inherent in introducing a toric intraocular lens (IOL) to a non-refractive cataract practice, and evaluate residual astigmatism achieved and its impact on patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following introduction of a toric IOL to a cataract practice with all procedures undertaken by a single, non-refractive, surgeon (SB), pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative data was analysed. Attenuation of anticipated post-operative astigmatism was examined, and subjectively perceived visual functioning was assessed using validated questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median difference vector (DV, the induced astigmatic change [by magnitude and axis] that would enable the initial surgery to achieve intended target) was 0.93D; median anticipated DV with a non-toric IOL was 2.38D. One eye exhibited 0.75D residual astigmatism, compared to 3.8D anticipated residual astigmatism with a non-toric IOL. 100% of respondents reported satisfaction of ≥ 6/10, with 37.84% of respondents entirely satisfied (10/10). 17 patients (38.63%) reported no symptoms of dysphotopsia (dysphoptosia score 0/10), only 3 respondents (6.8%) reported a clinically meaningful level of dysphotopsia (≥ 4/10). Mean post-operative NEI VF-11 score was 0.54 (+/-0.83; scale 0 - 4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of a toric IOL to manage astigmatism during cataract surgery results in less post-operative astigmatism than a non-toric IOL, resulting in avoidance of unacceptable post-operative astigmatism.</p>","PeriodicalId":91712,"journal":{"name":"International journal of ophthalmology and clinical research","volume":"3 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5098602/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of ophthalmology and clinical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2378-346x/1410056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To identify challenges inherent in introducing a toric intraocular lens (IOL) to a non-refractive cataract practice, and evaluate residual astigmatism achieved and its impact on patient satisfaction.

Methods: Following introduction of a toric IOL to a cataract practice with all procedures undertaken by a single, non-refractive, surgeon (SB), pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative data was analysed. Attenuation of anticipated post-operative astigmatism was examined, and subjectively perceived visual functioning was assessed using validated questionnaires.

Results: Median difference vector (DV, the induced astigmatic change [by magnitude and axis] that would enable the initial surgery to achieve intended target) was 0.93D; median anticipated DV with a non-toric IOL was 2.38D. One eye exhibited 0.75D residual astigmatism, compared to 3.8D anticipated residual astigmatism with a non-toric IOL. 100% of respondents reported satisfaction of ≥ 6/10, with 37.84% of respondents entirely satisfied (10/10). 17 patients (38.63%) reported no symptoms of dysphotopsia (dysphoptosia score 0/10), only 3 respondents (6.8%) reported a clinically meaningful level of dysphotopsia (≥ 4/10). Mean post-operative NEI VF-11 score was 0.54 (+/-0.83; scale 0 - 4).

Conclusion: Use of a toric IOL to manage astigmatism during cataract surgery results in less post-operative astigmatism than a non-toric IOL, resulting in avoidance of unacceptable post-operative astigmatism.

在非屈光性白内障手术中引入环形人工晶状体:挑战和结果。
目的:确定在非屈光性白内障手术中引入环形人工晶状体(IOL)所固有的挑战,并评估所获得的残余散光及其对患者满意度的影响。方法:采用单位非屈光外科医生(SB)实施的环形人工晶状体白内障手术,分析术前、术中及术后数据。检查预期术后散光的衰减,并使用有效的问卷评估主观感知的视觉功能。结果:中位差矢量(DV,使初始手术达到预期目标的诱导散光变化[按大小和轴])为0.93D;非环形人工晶状体的中位预期DV为2.38D。一只眼的剩余散光为0.75D,而非环形人工晶状体的预期剩余散光为3.8D。100%的受访者满意度≥6/10,37.84%的受访者完全满意(10/10)。17例(38.63%)患者报告无呼吸困难症状(呼吸困难评分0/10),仅有3例(6.8%)患者报告有临床意义的呼吸困难水平(≥4/10)。术后NEI VF-11平均评分为0.54 (+/-0.83;等级0 - 4)。结论:在白内障手术中使用环状体人工晶状体控制白内障术后散光比使用非环状体人工晶状体减少术后散光,避免了术后不可接受的散光。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信