Evaluation of image analysis tools for the measurement of cellular morphology.

IF 4.6 2区 生物学 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology Pub Date : 2025-05-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fcell.2025.1572212
Matthew D Bourn, Lauren F Daly, Jim F Huggett, Julian Braybrook, Jeanne F Rivera
{"title":"Evaluation of image analysis tools for the measurement of cellular morphology.","authors":"Matthew D Bourn, Lauren F Daly, Jim F Huggett, Julian Braybrook, Jeanne F Rivera","doi":"10.3389/fcell.2025.1572212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Morphological cell analysis offers a means of identification and classification of key morphological measurement parameters linked to cell bioactivity and cell health and, as such, it is of great interest to academic and industrial research sectors. Widespread adoption of this approach has yet to occur, partially due to the lack of alignment in analysis methodologies and output metrics, limiting data comparability. Work within the cell metrology and wider multidisciplinary community aims to reduce data variability through the improved alignment of image acquisition and analysis methodologies. Furthermore, to improve data comparability, research has also focused on the identification of a minimal set of morphological measurands, often termed critical quality attributes (CQAs), which are traceable to standardised (SI) units of measurement. Whilst efforts in defining CQAs have progressed significantly for healthcare applications, there are still numerous measurement challenges associated with image analysis of cultured cells due, in part, to their complex heterogenous nature. This review evaluates the various automated image analysis tools developed for morphological analysis of four commonly considered cell morphological features: the nucleus, actin cytoskeleton, mitochondria, and the cell membrane. The measurement methodologies and outputs from each tool have been evaluated and coinciding outputs have been highlighted as potential CQAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12448,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology","volume":"13 ","pages":"1572212"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12119626/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2025.1572212","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Morphological cell analysis offers a means of identification and classification of key morphological measurement parameters linked to cell bioactivity and cell health and, as such, it is of great interest to academic and industrial research sectors. Widespread adoption of this approach has yet to occur, partially due to the lack of alignment in analysis methodologies and output metrics, limiting data comparability. Work within the cell metrology and wider multidisciplinary community aims to reduce data variability through the improved alignment of image acquisition and analysis methodologies. Furthermore, to improve data comparability, research has also focused on the identification of a minimal set of morphological measurands, often termed critical quality attributes (CQAs), which are traceable to standardised (SI) units of measurement. Whilst efforts in defining CQAs have progressed significantly for healthcare applications, there are still numerous measurement challenges associated with image analysis of cultured cells due, in part, to their complex heterogenous nature. This review evaluates the various automated image analysis tools developed for morphological analysis of four commonly considered cell morphological features: the nucleus, actin cytoskeleton, mitochondria, and the cell membrane. The measurement methodologies and outputs from each tool have been evaluated and coinciding outputs have been highlighted as potential CQAs.

评价用于测量细胞形态的图像分析工具。
形态学细胞分析提供了一种识别和分类与细胞生物活性和细胞健康相关的关键形态学测量参数的手段,因此,它对学术和工业研究部门非常感兴趣。这种方法尚未得到广泛采用,部分原因是分析方法和输出指标缺乏一致性,限制了数据的可比性。在细胞计量学和更广泛的多学科社区内的工作旨在通过改进图像采集和分析方法的校准来减少数据的可变性。此外,为了提高数据的可比性,研究还集中在识别最小的形态学测量集,通常称为关键质量属性(cqa),它们可追溯到标准化(SI)测量单位。虽然在医疗保健应用中定义cqa的工作取得了重大进展,但由于培养细胞的复杂异质性,仍然存在许多与图像分析相关的测量挑战。这篇综述评估了各种自动图像分析工具,用于分析四种常见的细胞形态特征:细胞核、肌动蛋白细胞骨架、线粒体和细胞膜。对每个工具的测量方法和输出进行了评价,并将相一致的输出突出显示为潜在的cqa。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Cell Biology
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
2531
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology is a broad-scope, interdisciplinary open-access journal, focusing on the fundamental processes of life, led by Prof Amanda Fisher and supported by a geographically diverse, high-quality editorial board. The journal welcomes submissions on a wide spectrum of cell and developmental biology, covering intracellular and extracellular dynamics, with sections focusing on signaling, adhesion, migration, cell death and survival and membrane trafficking. Additionally, the journal offers sections dedicated to the cutting edge of fundamental and translational research in molecular medicine and stem cell biology. With a collaborative, rigorous and transparent peer-review, the journal produces the highest scientific quality in both fundamental and applied research, and advanced article level metrics measure the real-time impact and influence of each publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信