Fitness Differences Among Professional Firefighters Utilizing Various Conditioning Regimens Throughout the Year.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Petr Miřátský, Mikuláš Hank, Tomáš Gryc, Matěj Brožka, Lee Cabell, Rafael F Escamilla, František Zahálka, Tomáš Malý
{"title":"Fitness Differences Among Professional Firefighters Utilizing Various Conditioning Regimens Throughout the Year.","authors":"Petr Miřátský, Mikuláš Hank, Tomáš Gryc, Matěj Brožka, Lee Cabell, Rafael F Escamilla, František Zahálka, Tomáš Malý","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Miřátský, P, Hank, M, Gryc, T, Brožka, M, Cabell, L, Escamilla, R, Zahálka, F, and Malý, T. Fitness differences among professional firefighters utilizing various conditioning regimens throughout the year. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2025-The aim of this study was to compare selected parameters of physical fitness of Czech frontline professional firefighters (n = 92), who performed various physical activities according to their preferences within their regular physical preparation for 1 year. These firefighters were assigned to 1 of 3 groups based on their training preferences and sport focus: General Sports Activities (GSA; n = 30), Fire Sport (FS; n = 36), and Toughest Firefighter Alive (TFA; n = 26). All subjects completed (in period September) a battery of laboratory fitness tests including body composition, lower limb muscular strength and power, and cardiorespiratory fitness. Firefighters in the FS and TFA groups were found to have significantly higher values (p < 0.01) for the following variables: fat-free mass, isokinetic strength, muscle power, maximum aerobic capacity, minute ventilation, and heart rate at the anaerobic threshold than their counterparts in the GSA group. There were no significant differences in body mass (p = 0.21) and body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.48) between the firefighter groups. Professional frontline firefighters' level of physical fitness is improved by the incorporation of specific physical training activities, duties, and disciplines. This can have a direct impact on frontline firefighters' capacity to fight fires safely and effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005127","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Miřátský, P, Hank, M, Gryc, T, Brožka, M, Cabell, L, Escamilla, R, Zahálka, F, and Malý, T. Fitness differences among professional firefighters utilizing various conditioning regimens throughout the year. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2025-The aim of this study was to compare selected parameters of physical fitness of Czech frontline professional firefighters (n = 92), who performed various physical activities according to their preferences within their regular physical preparation for 1 year. These firefighters were assigned to 1 of 3 groups based on their training preferences and sport focus: General Sports Activities (GSA; n = 30), Fire Sport (FS; n = 36), and Toughest Firefighter Alive (TFA; n = 26). All subjects completed (in period September) a battery of laboratory fitness tests including body composition, lower limb muscular strength and power, and cardiorespiratory fitness. Firefighters in the FS and TFA groups were found to have significantly higher values (p < 0.01) for the following variables: fat-free mass, isokinetic strength, muscle power, maximum aerobic capacity, minute ventilation, and heart rate at the anaerobic threshold than their counterparts in the GSA group. There were no significant differences in body mass (p = 0.21) and body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.48) between the firefighter groups. Professional frontline firefighters' level of physical fitness is improved by the incorporation of specific physical training activities, duties, and disciplines. This can have a direct impact on frontline firefighters' capacity to fight fires safely and effectively.

全年使用不同调理方案的专业消防员之间的健康差异。
摘要:Miřátský, P, Hank, M, Gryc, T, Brožka, M, Cabell, L, Escamilla, R, Zahálka, F, Malý, T.专业消防员全年使用不同健身方案的体能差异。J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2025-本研究的目的是比较捷克一线专业消防员(n = 92)的身体健康选择参数,他们在1年的定期体育准备中根据自己的喜好进行各种体育活动。这些消防员根据他们的训练偏好和运动重点被分为三组:一般体育活动(GSA);n = 30), Fire Sport (FS;n = 36),以及最顽强的消防员(TFA;N = 26)。所有受试者(在9月期间)完成了一系列实验室体能测试,包括身体成分、下肢肌肉力量和功率以及心肺功能。与GSA组相比,FS组和TFA组的消防员在以下变量方面具有显著更高的值(p < 0.01):无脂质量、等速力量、肌肉力量、最大有氧能力、分钟通气量和无氧阈心率。两组消防员的身体质量(p = 0.21)和身体质量指数(BMI) (p = 0.48)差异均无统计学意义。专业前线消防员的体能水平是通过结合具体的体能训练活动、职责和纪律来提高的。这可能直接影响前线消防员安全有效地灭火的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信