Study of the effectiveness of a supported intervention package in reducing the risk of avian influenza human exposure through the reduction of infections in poultry: Egypt, 2006-2021.
Manal Fahim, Walaa Alim, Shimaa Abukamar, Rabeh El-Shesheny, Wael H Roshdy, Hossam Hassan, Amira Mohsen, Salma Afifi, Mohamed Abdel Fattah, Radi Hammad, Amr Kandeel
{"title":"Study of the effectiveness of a supported intervention package in reducing the risk of avian influenza human exposure through the reduction of infections in poultry: Egypt, 2006-2021.","authors":"Manal Fahim, Walaa Alim, Shimaa Abukamar, Rabeh El-Shesheny, Wael H Roshdy, Hossam Hassan, Amira Mohsen, Salma Afifi, Mohamed Abdel Fattah, Radi Hammad, Amr Kandeel","doi":"10.1186/s12985-025-02810-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>For a decade, avian influenza (AI) viruses were major concern for Egypt since they are endemic in poultry and have caused 359 human infections, accounting for 40% of cases globally. Interventions implemented before 2015 proved to have minor impact on the spread of infection. Since 2015, a Supported Intervention Package (SIP) was implemented to reduce the risk of human exposure by reducing infections in poultry. The intervention package included enhanced surveillance and laboratory capacity, early outbreak detection, and raised community awareness. This study aims to evaluate SIP's effectiveness by comparing number and rates of AI in humans and poultry before and after intervention package implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>AI surveillance data for poultry and humans from 2006 to 2021 was obtained and linked. Human AI data include patients' demographics, clinical picture, risk factors, lab results and outcome, while poultry data include number prevent of positive specimens for AI by time and place. Confirmation performed by testing oropharyngeal swabs collected from suspected patients and poultry using RT-PCR in the affiliated laboratory. Positive rates were calculated, descriptive data analysis was performed and rate of infection was plotted against demographics and risk factors. Results compared before and after implementation of using Chi<sup>2</sup> and t-test with p < 0.05 significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among all confirmed cases, 346(96.4%) reported before and 13(3.6%) after SIP implementation with no cases reported after 2017. A significant reduction in positivity rate of both human and poultry cases (2.0 vs. 0.2% and 2.4 vs. 1.2%, p < 0.001) found after 2015. Percent of housewives decreased from 30.9 to 7.7%, p < 0.05 and positive specimens' rates from backyards decreased from 61.1 to 47.9%, p < 0.001. Median days to laboratory confirmation reduced from 3.6 to 2.8 days. The genetic analysis indicated a major genetic drift occurred before 2015, possibly due to inadequate control measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Study indicated reduced infections in humans and poultry suggesting effectiveness of SIP, which also raised community awareness as shown by reducing infections among housewives and enhancing surveillance as shown by case earlier detection. Continued coordinated efforts between human and poultry sectors are needed to contribute to the elimination of the disease in Egypt.</p>","PeriodicalId":23616,"journal":{"name":"Virology Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"170"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12123743/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-025-02810-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: For a decade, avian influenza (AI) viruses were major concern for Egypt since they are endemic in poultry and have caused 359 human infections, accounting for 40% of cases globally. Interventions implemented before 2015 proved to have minor impact on the spread of infection. Since 2015, a Supported Intervention Package (SIP) was implemented to reduce the risk of human exposure by reducing infections in poultry. The intervention package included enhanced surveillance and laboratory capacity, early outbreak detection, and raised community awareness. This study aims to evaluate SIP's effectiveness by comparing number and rates of AI in humans and poultry before and after intervention package implementation.
Methods: AI surveillance data for poultry and humans from 2006 to 2021 was obtained and linked. Human AI data include patients' demographics, clinical picture, risk factors, lab results and outcome, while poultry data include number prevent of positive specimens for AI by time and place. Confirmation performed by testing oropharyngeal swabs collected from suspected patients and poultry using RT-PCR in the affiliated laboratory. Positive rates were calculated, descriptive data analysis was performed and rate of infection was plotted against demographics and risk factors. Results compared before and after implementation of using Chi2 and t-test with p < 0.05 significance.
Results: Among all confirmed cases, 346(96.4%) reported before and 13(3.6%) after SIP implementation with no cases reported after 2017. A significant reduction in positivity rate of both human and poultry cases (2.0 vs. 0.2% and 2.4 vs. 1.2%, p < 0.001) found after 2015. Percent of housewives decreased from 30.9 to 7.7%, p < 0.05 and positive specimens' rates from backyards decreased from 61.1 to 47.9%, p < 0.001. Median days to laboratory confirmation reduced from 3.6 to 2.8 days. The genetic analysis indicated a major genetic drift occurred before 2015, possibly due to inadequate control measures.
Conclusions: The Study indicated reduced infections in humans and poultry suggesting effectiveness of SIP, which also raised community awareness as shown by reducing infections among housewives and enhancing surveillance as shown by case earlier detection. Continued coordinated efforts between human and poultry sectors are needed to contribute to the elimination of the disease in Egypt.
导言:十年来,禽流感(AI)病毒是埃及的主要关切,因为它们在家禽中流行,并已造成359人感染,占全球病例的40%。事实证明,2015年之前实施的干预措施对感染传播的影响很小。自2015年以来,实施了一揽子支持干预措施(SIP),通过减少家禽感染来降低人类接触的风险。一揽子干预措施包括加强监测和实验室能力、及早发现疫情以及提高社区认识。本研究旨在通过比较干预方案实施前后人类和家禽中AI的数量和发生率来评估SIP的有效性。方法:获取2006 - 2021年家禽和人类人工智能监测数据并进行关联。人类人工智能数据包括患者的人口统计、临床情况、风险因素、实验室结果和结果,而家禽数据包括按时间和地点划分的人工智能阳性标本的数量。通过在附属实验室使用RT-PCR检测从疑似患者和家禽收集的口咽拭子进行确认。计算阳性率,进行描述性数据分析,并根据人口统计学和危险因素绘制感染率。结果:实施SIP前报告确诊病例346例(96.4%),实施SIP后报告确诊病例13例(3.6%),2017年以后无病例报告。人类和家禽病例的阳性率均显著降低(2.0 vs. 0.2%, 2.4 vs. 1.2%)。结论:研究表明,人类和家禽的感染减少,表明SIP的有效性,也提高了社区意识,减少了家庭主妇的感染,加强了监测,这表明病例早期发现。人类和家禽部门之间需要继续协调努力,以促进在埃及消除该疾病。
期刊介绍:
Virology Journal is an open access, peer reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of virology, including research on the viruses of animals, plants and microbes. The journal welcomes basic research as well as pre-clinical and clinical studies of novel diagnostic tools, vaccines and anti-viral therapies.
The Editorial policy of Virology Journal is to publish all research which is assessed by peer reviewers to be a coherent and sound addition to the scientific literature, and puts less emphasis on interest levels or perceived impact.