"Do Doctors and Patients Have Different Understandings of Pain?" - A Pilot Study of Different Perspectives and Understandings of Pain in Clinical Pain Research.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-05-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S508125
Lise Kirstine Gormsen
{"title":"\"Do Doctors and Patients Have Different Understandings of Pain?\" - A Pilot Study of Different Perspectives and Understandings of Pain in Clinical Pain Research.","authors":"Lise Kirstine Gormsen","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S508125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Ambiguous results on pain thresholds often occur from biomedical pain research. Although results and methods are frequently discussed, only few studies have investigated participants' understanding and perspectives of pain in research settings. The aim of this qualitative pilot study was to explore different understandings of pain in a clinical pain research setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We briefly interviewed 25 subjects, including Danish pain doctors and psychiatrists as well as pain patients, depressed patients, and healthy controls (five in each group) about their understanding of pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Laymen seem less inclined to verbalize pain than professionals. In addition, they may embrace a concept of suffering that goes beyond the traditional body-mind dichotomy. Since suffering may be part of the pain experience, this difference in the understanding of pain may be at the core of the often ambiguous results when doctors and other health professionals study pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results emphasize the need for supporting the ongoing process of integrating broad perspectives on pain in clinical pain research, including the concept of suffering. More research and resources are needed in this particular area of pain medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"2651-2662"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12120140/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S508125","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Ambiguous results on pain thresholds often occur from biomedical pain research. Although results and methods are frequently discussed, only few studies have investigated participants' understanding and perspectives of pain in research settings. The aim of this qualitative pilot study was to explore different understandings of pain in a clinical pain research setting.

Methods: We briefly interviewed 25 subjects, including Danish pain doctors and psychiatrists as well as pain patients, depressed patients, and healthy controls (five in each group) about their understanding of pain.

Results: Laymen seem less inclined to verbalize pain than professionals. In addition, they may embrace a concept of suffering that goes beyond the traditional body-mind dichotomy. Since suffering may be part of the pain experience, this difference in the understanding of pain may be at the core of the often ambiguous results when doctors and other health professionals study pain.

Conclusion: The results emphasize the need for supporting the ongoing process of integrating broad perspectives on pain in clinical pain research, including the concept of suffering. More research and resources are needed in this particular area of pain medicine.

“医生和病人对疼痛的理解不同吗?”-临床疼痛研究中对疼痛的不同观点和理解的初步研究
背景与目的:生物医学疼痛研究中经常出现疼痛阈值不明确的结果。尽管结果和方法经常被讨论,但只有少数研究调查了研究环境中参与者对疼痛的理解和观点。本定性初步研究的目的是在临床疼痛研究环境中探索对疼痛的不同理解。方法:我们对丹麦疼痛医生、精神科医生、疼痛患者、抑郁症患者和健康对照(每组5人)进行了简短的访谈,了解他们对疼痛的理解。结果:外行人似乎比专业人士更不愿意用语言表达疼痛。此外,他们可能会接受一种超越传统身心二分法的痛苦概念。由于痛苦可能是疼痛体验的一部分,所以当医生和其他健康专业人员研究疼痛时,这种对疼痛理解的差异可能是经常模棱两可的结果的核心。结论:研究结果强调了在临床疼痛研究中整合广泛的疼痛视角的必要性,包括痛苦的概念。在这个特殊的疼痛医学领域需要更多的研究和资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信