Age-related traumatic anatomy and personalized medial incision design for calcaneal fractures in older adults using three-dimensional mapping.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Yuanzhen Zhang, Jiayun Liu, Jinhua Yang, Ye Yuan, Guoyong Yin, Yu Zhang, Chun Lu
{"title":"Age-related traumatic anatomy and personalized medial incision design for calcaneal fractures in older adults using three-dimensional mapping.","authors":"Yuanzhen Zhang, Jiayun Liu, Jinhua Yang, Ye Yuan, Guoyong Yin, Yu Zhang, Chun Lu","doi":"10.1186/s13018-025-05934-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Calcaneal fractures usually arise from high-energy trauma and predominantly impact young individuals. In older adults (aged ≥ 50 years), declining bone density and muscle strength increase fracture risk from low-energy trauma, leading to a bimodal epidemiological distribution. The intricacies of calcaneal fractures in older adults, alongside osteoporosis and soft tissue fragility, complicate surgical intervention. This study aims to analyze age-related differences in calcaneal fracture characteristics using three-dimensional(3D) mapping and assess their impact on medial incision design.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 95 patients with closed calcaneal fractures were categorized into two groups: Younger (< 50 years, n = 61) and Older (≥ 50 years, n = 34). The process of 3D fracture mapping was executed utilizing Mimics and 3-matic software, alongside the reconstruction of soft tissue, which encompassed the posterior tibial neurovascular bundle. Differences in fracture distribution and incision parameters (length, α angle, D1, and D2) were statistically analyzed, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fracture lines in both groups were predominantly located around the lateral Gissane's angle and critical weight-bearing areas of the calcaneus. In the Younger Group, fracture lines were long, continuous, and involved fewer fragments, correlating with high-energy trauma. The Older Group showed more comminuted lines, characteristic of osteoporotic fractures. The α angle and D1 distance were significantly smaller in the Older Group (p < 0.05), indicating closer proximity to the medial malleolus. D2 values were also smaller (p < 0.05), with 48.65% intersecting the neurovascular bundle compared to 31.34% in the Younger Group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Age significantly influences medial wall fracture patterns and complexity in calcaneal injuries. A personalized medial incision based on fracture morphology provides better exposure and reduction compared to traditional methods. Although the incision is closer to the neurovascular bundle in older patients, meticulous surgical technique guarantees safety. The integration of a medial incision with sinus-tarsi (ST) approach minimizes the necessity for extensive lateral exposure, thereby diminishing soft tissue complications and improving surgical outcomes for the elderly population.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV, retrospective case series.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"546"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05934-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Calcaneal fractures usually arise from high-energy trauma and predominantly impact young individuals. In older adults (aged ≥ 50 years), declining bone density and muscle strength increase fracture risk from low-energy trauma, leading to a bimodal epidemiological distribution. The intricacies of calcaneal fractures in older adults, alongside osteoporosis and soft tissue fragility, complicate surgical intervention. This study aims to analyze age-related differences in calcaneal fracture characteristics using three-dimensional(3D) mapping and assess their impact on medial incision design.

Method: A total of 95 patients with closed calcaneal fractures were categorized into two groups: Younger (< 50 years, n = 61) and Older (≥ 50 years, n = 34). The process of 3D fracture mapping was executed utilizing Mimics and 3-matic software, alongside the reconstruction of soft tissue, which encompassed the posterior tibial neurovascular bundle. Differences in fracture distribution and incision parameters (length, α angle, D1, and D2) were statistically analyzed, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results: Fracture lines in both groups were predominantly located around the lateral Gissane's angle and critical weight-bearing areas of the calcaneus. In the Younger Group, fracture lines were long, continuous, and involved fewer fragments, correlating with high-energy trauma. The Older Group showed more comminuted lines, characteristic of osteoporotic fractures. The α angle and D1 distance were significantly smaller in the Older Group (p < 0.05), indicating closer proximity to the medial malleolus. D2 values were also smaller (p < 0.05), with 48.65% intersecting the neurovascular bundle compared to 31.34% in the Younger Group.

Conclusion: Age significantly influences medial wall fracture patterns and complexity in calcaneal injuries. A personalized medial incision based on fracture morphology provides better exposure and reduction compared to traditional methods. Although the incision is closer to the neurovascular bundle in older patients, meticulous surgical technique guarantees safety. The integration of a medial incision with sinus-tarsi (ST) approach minimizes the necessity for extensive lateral exposure, thereby diminishing soft tissue complications and improving surgical outcomes for the elderly population.

Level of evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.

老年人跟骨骨折的年龄相关创伤解剖和个性化内侧切口设计。
背景:跟骨骨折通常由高能创伤引起,主要影响年轻人。在老年人(≥50岁)中,骨密度和肌肉力量的下降增加了低能量创伤导致骨折的风险,导致双峰流行病学分布。老年人跟骨骨折的复杂性,以及骨质疏松症和软组织易碎性,使手术干预复杂化。本研究旨在通过三维制图分析跟骨骨折特征的年龄相关性差异,并评估其对内侧切口设计的影响。方法:将95例闭合性跟骨骨折患者分为两组:Younger组(结果:两组骨折线主要位于跟骨外侧Gissane角和关键负重区附近)。在年轻组,骨折线长,连续,涉及较少碎片,与高能创伤相关。老年组表现出更多的粉碎性线,这是骨质疏松性骨折的特征。老年组α角和D1距离明显小于老年组(p)。结论:年龄对跟骨内侧壁骨折类型及复杂性有显著影响。与传统方法相比,基于骨折形态的个性化内侧切口提供了更好的暴露和复位。虽然老年患者的切口更靠近神经血管束,但细致的手术技术保证了安全性。内侧切口与跗骨窦(ST)入路的结合最大限度地减少了广泛外侧暴露的必要性,从而减少了软组织并发症,改善了老年人的手术效果。证据级别:四级,回顾性病例系列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信