Utility of the morphological scoring of costal cartilage ossification in age estimation of adult Egyptians using multidetector computed tomography.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Forensic Sciences Research Pub Date : 2024-09-20 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1093/fsr/owae061
Mai Mohammad Elgendy, Somaya Abdel-Gawad Madkour, Fatma Mohamed Magdi Badr Eldine, Doaa Mokhtar Emara, MennattAllah Hassan Attia
{"title":"Utility of the morphological scoring of costal cartilage ossification in age estimation of adult Egyptians using multidetector computed tomography.","authors":"Mai Mohammad Elgendy, Somaya Abdel-Gawad Madkour, Fatma Mohamed Magdi Badr Eldine, Doaa Mokhtar Emara, MennattAllah Hassan Attia","doi":"10.1093/fsr/owae061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Age estimation of adults is a challenging procedure in forensic practice. Inspired by the previous work by Chinese scholars, we established population-specific age estimation models from the osseous and calcified projections (OCPs) of costal cartilages, using three-dimensional volume-rendering technique. A total of 168 clinical CT scans (2 mm slice thickness) were used to develop the sex-specific age prediction models from a sample of Egyptians, comprising 70 females and 98 males, with documented ages between 12 and 85 years. The sample was also used for validating the Chinese model. We reported the differences between the predictive accuracy of the Egyptian (population specific) and Chinese (non-population specific) models. The most accurate age estimation model was stepwise linear regression with standard error of estimates of 10.9 and 11.8 years in males and females, respectively. For the simple linear regression models, the most accurate formula included OCP of the right second costal cartilage in males and OCP of the left third costal cartilage in females with standard error of estimates of 11.2 and 12.2 years, respectively, and mean absolute error (MAE) of 8.8 and 9.6 years, respectively. By comparison, the best accuracy rates produced by the Chinese <i>vs.</i> the Egyptian models in males and females within 5 years were 30.61% and 32.86% <i>vs.</i> 35.71% and 32.86%, respectively, whereas within 10 years, the accuracy rates increased up to 57.14% and 58.57% <i>vs.</i> 72.45% and 64.29%, respectively. Although the accuracy rates from the Chinese models were lower than those obtained from the Egyptian models, the MAE and least error values were comparable in both sexes. Notable accurate age estimation rates in the advanced age group ≥40 years were reached being 81.25% to 97.92% in males and 69.77% to 93.02% in females. OCP of the right first costal cartilage was the most accurate in cross-population application for males and females with MAE values of 10.7 and 11.03 years, respectively, with balanced accuracy rates of age estimation using the 10-year interval and 40-year cutoff.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Age differences in calcification form and amount in the seven costal cartilages were found.The best model for males include the second costal cartilage.The best model for females include third or fifth costal cartilages.First OCP is the most accurate in cross-population application regardless of sex.The best OCP in one population is not necessarily the best predictor in both samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":45852,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Sciences Research","volume":"10 2","pages":"owae061"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12120137/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Sciences Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fsr/owae061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Age estimation of adults is a challenging procedure in forensic practice. Inspired by the previous work by Chinese scholars, we established population-specific age estimation models from the osseous and calcified projections (OCPs) of costal cartilages, using three-dimensional volume-rendering technique. A total of 168 clinical CT scans (2 mm slice thickness) were used to develop the sex-specific age prediction models from a sample of Egyptians, comprising 70 females and 98 males, with documented ages between 12 and 85 years. The sample was also used for validating the Chinese model. We reported the differences between the predictive accuracy of the Egyptian (population specific) and Chinese (non-population specific) models. The most accurate age estimation model was stepwise linear regression with standard error of estimates of 10.9 and 11.8 years in males and females, respectively. For the simple linear regression models, the most accurate formula included OCP of the right second costal cartilage in males and OCP of the left third costal cartilage in females with standard error of estimates of 11.2 and 12.2 years, respectively, and mean absolute error (MAE) of 8.8 and 9.6 years, respectively. By comparison, the best accuracy rates produced by the Chinese vs. the Egyptian models in males and females within 5 years were 30.61% and 32.86% vs. 35.71% and 32.86%, respectively, whereas within 10 years, the accuracy rates increased up to 57.14% and 58.57% vs. 72.45% and 64.29%, respectively. Although the accuracy rates from the Chinese models were lower than those obtained from the Egyptian models, the MAE and least error values were comparable in both sexes. Notable accurate age estimation rates in the advanced age group ≥40 years were reached being 81.25% to 97.92% in males and 69.77% to 93.02% in females. OCP of the right first costal cartilage was the most accurate in cross-population application for males and females with MAE values of 10.7 and 11.03 years, respectively, with balanced accuracy rates of age estimation using the 10-year interval and 40-year cutoff.

Key points: Age differences in calcification form and amount in the seven costal cartilages were found.The best model for males include the second costal cartilage.The best model for females include third or fifth costal cartilages.First OCP is the most accurate in cross-population application regardless of sex.The best OCP in one population is not necessarily the best predictor in both samples.

肋软骨骨化形态学评分在埃及成人年龄估计中的应用。
成人年龄的估计是一个具有挑战性的程序在法医实践。受中国学者前人工作的启发,我们利用三维体绘制技术,从肋软骨的骨和钙化投影(ocp)建立了人群特定年龄估计模型。共使用168个临床CT扫描(2毫米切片厚度)从埃及人样本中建立性别特异性年龄预测模型,其中包括70名女性和98名男性,记录年龄在12至85岁之间。该样本也用于验证中国模型。我们报告了埃及(特定人群)和中国(非特定人群)模型的预测准确性之间的差异。最准确的年龄估计模型为逐步线性回归,男性和女性的估计标准误差分别为10.9和11.8岁。对于简单的线性回归模型,最准确的公式为男性右侧第二肋软骨OCP和女性左侧第三肋软骨OCP,估计的标准误差分别为11.2和12.2年,平均绝对误差(MAE)分别为8.8和9.6年。通过比较,中国模型和埃及模型在男性和女性中5年内的最佳准确率分别为30.61%和32.86%,而在10年内,准确率分别为57.14%和58.57%,分别为35.71%和32.86%,分别为72.45%和64.29%。虽然中国模型的准确率低于埃及模型,但男女的MAE和最小误差值具有可比性。≥40岁高龄组男性的年龄估计准确率为81.25% ~ 97.92%,女性为69.77% ~ 93.02%。右第一肋软骨OCP在男性和女性的跨群体应用中最准确,MAE值分别为10.7和11.03岁,使用10年间隔和40年截止年龄估计的准确率平衡。重点:发现7种肋软骨钙化形式和钙化量的年龄差异。男性的最佳模型包括第二肋软骨。女性的最佳模型包括第三或第五肋软骨。首先,无论性别如何,OCP在跨种群应用中是最准确的。一个群体的最佳OCP不一定是两个样本的最佳预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forensic Sciences Research
Forensic Sciences Research MEDICINE, LEGAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
158
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信