High-Power Lasers Induce Dose-Dependent Acute Kidney Injury.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Mantu Gupta, Kavita Gupta, Roman Shimonov, Raymond Khargi, Anna Ricapito, Blair Gallante, Christopher Connors, Dara Lundon, Manishkumar Patel, Seunghee Kim-Schulze, William Atallah, Natasha Kyprianou, Alan J Yaghoubian
{"title":"High-Power Lasers Induce Dose-Dependent Acute Kidney Injury.","authors":"Mantu Gupta, Kavita Gupta, Roman Shimonov, Raymond Khargi, Anna Ricapito, Blair Gallante, Christopher Connors, Dara Lundon, Manishkumar Patel, Seunghee Kim-Schulze, William Atallah, Natasha Kyprianou, Alan J Yaghoubian","doi":"10.1089/end.2025.0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction and Objective:</i></b> High-powered lasers have been hypothesized to cause kidney injury; however, no human studies have confirmed or quantified this damage. Our objective was to identify and quantify damage and explore factors affecting degree of injury in patients undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) with thulium fiber laser (TFL) and Holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG) lasers. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Patients undergoing RIRS for unilateral nonobstructing renal stones were randomized to receive lithotripsy with either a 60 W SuperPulse TFL or 120 W pulse-modulated Ho:YAG laser. A control group of patients undergoing RIRS without laser use were used for comparison. Urine samples were collected at 3 time points as follows: preoperative, 1 hour postoperative, and 10 days postoperative. Samples were analyzed using ELISA for key biomarkers-kidney injury molecule-1, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), and β2-microglobulin-normalized to urine creatinine. Primary outcome was the extent of renal injury based on biomarker elevation. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Ninety-one patients with similar baseline patient and stone characteristics were randomized (46 TFL, 45 Ho:YAG). Both lasers led to significant biomarker elevation, which trended toward but did not reach baseline by postoperative day 10. The Ho:YAG laser resulted in a sustained increase in NGAL at 10 days. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that injury is dose dependent on total laser energy used (<i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>p</i> = 0.006) and worse in older patients (<i>p</i> = 0.009) and in those with metabolic syndrome (<i>p</i> = 0.002), with slower recovery in both these groups, but not with the type of laser used. Multiple levels of the nephron are involved. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> There is notable kidney injury induced by both SuperPulse TFL and pulse-modulated Ho:YAG lasers in a dose-dependent manner, but the 2 lasers do not differ in the degree of injury. Injury occurs at multiple levels. Age and metabolic syndrome affect the amount of injury and recovery from injury. Further studies evaluating factors that can mitigate damage from high-energy lasers are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2025.0036","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and Objective: High-powered lasers have been hypothesized to cause kidney injury; however, no human studies have confirmed or quantified this damage. Our objective was to identify and quantify damage and explore factors affecting degree of injury in patients undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) with thulium fiber laser (TFL) and Holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG) lasers. Methods: Patients undergoing RIRS for unilateral nonobstructing renal stones were randomized to receive lithotripsy with either a 60 W SuperPulse TFL or 120 W pulse-modulated Ho:YAG laser. A control group of patients undergoing RIRS without laser use were used for comparison. Urine samples were collected at 3 time points as follows: preoperative, 1 hour postoperative, and 10 days postoperative. Samples were analyzed using ELISA for key biomarkers-kidney injury molecule-1, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), and β2-microglobulin-normalized to urine creatinine. Primary outcome was the extent of renal injury based on biomarker elevation. Results: Ninety-one patients with similar baseline patient and stone characteristics were randomized (46 TFL, 45 Ho:YAG). Both lasers led to significant biomarker elevation, which trended toward but did not reach baseline by postoperative day 10. The Ho:YAG laser resulted in a sustained increase in NGAL at 10 days. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that injury is dose dependent on total laser energy used (p < 0.001, p = 0.006) and worse in older patients (p = 0.009) and in those with metabolic syndrome (p = 0.002), with slower recovery in both these groups, but not with the type of laser used. Multiple levels of the nephron are involved. Conclusions: There is notable kidney injury induced by both SuperPulse TFL and pulse-modulated Ho:YAG lasers in a dose-dependent manner, but the 2 lasers do not differ in the degree of injury. Injury occurs at multiple levels. Age and metabolic syndrome affect the amount of injury and recovery from injury. Further studies evaluating factors that can mitigate damage from high-energy lasers are needed.

高功率激光诱导剂量依赖性急性肾损伤。
简介与目的:高功率激光被假设会导致肾损伤;然而,没有人类研究证实或量化这种损害。我们的目的是识别和量化损伤,并探讨影响逆行肾内手术(RIRS)患者使用铥光纤激光器(TFL)和钬:YAG激光器(Ho:YAG)损伤程度的因素。方法:单侧非梗阻性肾结石患者随机接受60 W超脉冲TFL或120 W脉冲调制Ho:YAG激光碎石。不使用激光的RIRS患者作为对照组进行比较。于术前、术后1小时、术后10天3个时间点采集尿样。使用ELISA分析样品的关键生物标志物-肾损伤分子-1、中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂钙蛋白(NGAL)和β2微球蛋白-尿肌酐归一化。主要终点是基于生物标志物升高的肾损伤程度。结果:91例基线患者和结石特征相似的患者被随机分组(46例TFL, 45例Ho:YAG)。两种激光均导致显著的生物标志物升高,到术后第10天,生物标志物趋于但未达到基线。Ho:YAG激光导致NGAL持续增加10天。多因素分析表明,损伤与使用的总激光能量有关(p < 0.001, p = 0.006),老年患者(p = 0.009)和代谢综合征患者(p = 0.002)的损伤更严重,两组患者恢复较慢,但与使用的激光类型无关。涉及肾元的多个层次。结论:超脉冲TFL和脉冲调制Ho:YAG激光均有明显的肾损伤,并呈剂量依赖性,但两种激光的损伤程度没有差异。损伤发生在多个层面。年龄和代谢综合征影响损伤量和损伤恢复。需要进一步的研究来评估能够减轻高能激光伤害的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信