"I always wondered if my baby is able to feel my love for them" -  Development and pilot testing of two behavioural feedback strategies designed to improve maternal self-efficacy.

Q1 Medicine
Wellcome Open Research Pub Date : 2025-05-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23564.2
Alessandra Prioreschi, Deborah M James, Rebecca M Pearson, Antonia Smith, Shane A Norris, Kirsten L Rennie
{"title":"<i>\"I always wondered if my baby is able to feel my love for them\" -</i>  Development and pilot testing of two behavioural feedback strategies designed to improve maternal self-efficacy.","authors":"Alessandra Prioreschi, Deborah M James, Rebecca M Pearson, Antonia Smith, Shane A Norris, Kirsten L Rennie","doi":"10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23564.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this pilot study was to describe the development of, and test the acceptability and feasibility of providing feedback on two behaviours in the context of supportive approaches to improve maternal self-efficacy. We hypothesised that providing individual behavioural feedback to mothers in a socially vulnerable context, when later embedded in supportive intervention approaches, may improve maternal self-efficacy and ultimately promote infant development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Feedback was developed following expert consultation with working groups, and included graphical feedback on mother and infant movement behaviours measured using accelerometry, as well as video feedback of mother-infant interactions using first person observation head cameras. Mothers wore the devices for one week, following which individual feedback on movement behaviours and mother-infant interactions was delivered at the Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital. We adapted an established and published strengths based approach as a guide for health workers to feedback video and accelerometer data. Feasibility and acceptability were tested by conducting focus group discussions with a sample of 8 mothers of infants aged 4-months from South Africa using a semi-structured interview guide.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mothers included in this study were generally single, unemployed, and less than half had completed formal schooling. Most mothers had two or more children, and lived in informal housing (such as shacks and small, temporary prefabricated structures) with only outdoor toilet facilities available. The feedback was found to be both feasible, and largely acceptable in this context and compliance was 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We have been able to develop feedback with the potential to sensitise mothers to their infants' behaviours. When embedded in a supportive intervention, these feedback modalities have the potential to improve mother's self-efficacy through increasing feelings of competence and reflexive functioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":23677,"journal":{"name":"Wellcome Open Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12120436/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wellcome Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23564.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this pilot study was to describe the development of, and test the acceptability and feasibility of providing feedback on two behaviours in the context of supportive approaches to improve maternal self-efficacy. We hypothesised that providing individual behavioural feedback to mothers in a socially vulnerable context, when later embedded in supportive intervention approaches, may improve maternal self-efficacy and ultimately promote infant development.

Methods: Feedback was developed following expert consultation with working groups, and included graphical feedback on mother and infant movement behaviours measured using accelerometry, as well as video feedback of mother-infant interactions using first person observation head cameras. Mothers wore the devices for one week, following which individual feedback on movement behaviours and mother-infant interactions was delivered at the Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital. We adapted an established and published strengths based approach as a guide for health workers to feedback video and accelerometer data. Feasibility and acceptability were tested by conducting focus group discussions with a sample of 8 mothers of infants aged 4-months from South Africa using a semi-structured interview guide.

Results: Mothers included in this study were generally single, unemployed, and less than half had completed formal schooling. Most mothers had two or more children, and lived in informal housing (such as shacks and small, temporary prefabricated structures) with only outdoor toilet facilities available. The feedback was found to be both feasible, and largely acceptable in this context and compliance was 100%.

Conclusion: We have been able to develop feedback with the potential to sensitise mothers to their infants' behaviours. When embedded in a supportive intervention, these feedback modalities have the potential to improve mother's self-efficacy through increasing feelings of competence and reflexive functioning.

“我一直想知道我的孩子是否能感受到我对他们的爱”——两种行为反馈策略的开发和试点测试,旨在提高母亲的自我效能感。
背景:本初步研究的目的是描述的发展,并测试的可接受性和可行性提供反馈的两种行为的支持方法的背景下,以提高产妇自我效能感。我们假设,向处于社会弱势环境中的母亲提供个人行为反馈,当后来嵌入支持性干预方法时,可能会提高母亲的自我效能,并最终促进婴儿的发育。方法:反馈是在与工作组专家协商后制定的,包括使用加速度计测量的母亲和婴儿运动行为的图形反馈,以及使用第一人称观察头戴摄像机的母婴互动视频反馈。母亲们戴上这些设备一周后,在克里斯·哈尼·巴拉格瓦纳特学术医院(Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital)提供了关于运动行为和母婴互动的个人反馈。我们采用了一种已建立并已发表的基于优势的方法,作为卫生工作者反馈视频和加速度计数据的指南。采用半结构化访谈指南,对来自南非的8位4个月大婴儿的母亲进行焦点小组讨论,以测试其可行性和可接受性。结果:本研究中包括的母亲通常是单身,失业,不到一半的人完成了正规教育。大多数母亲有两个或两个以上的孩子,住在只有室外厕所设施的非正式住房(如棚屋和小型临时预制建筑)中。发现反馈是可行的,并且在这种情况下基本上是可接受的,并且遵从性是100%。结论:我们已经能够开发有潜力的反馈,使母亲对婴儿的行为敏感。当嵌入支持性干预时,这些反馈模式有可能通过增加能力感和反射功能来提高母亲的自我效能感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wellcome Open Research
Wellcome Open Research Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: Wellcome Open Research publishes scholarly articles reporting any basic scientific, translational and clinical research that has been funded (or co-funded) by Wellcome. Each publication must have at least one author who has been, or still is, a recipient of a Wellcome grant. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others, is welcome and will be published irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies are all suitable. See the full list of article types here. All articles are published using a fully transparent, author-driven model: the authors are solely responsible for the content of their article. Invited peer review takes place openly after publication, and the authors play a crucial role in ensuring that the article is peer-reviewed by independent experts in a timely manner. Articles that pass peer review will be indexed in PubMed and elsewhere. Wellcome Open Research is an Open Research platform: all articles are published open access; the publishing and peer-review processes are fully transparent; and authors are asked to include detailed descriptions of methods and to provide full and easy access to source data underlying the results to improve reproducibility.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信