Kelly E Joniak, Sam R Moore, Alex N Ladan, Elena I Cantu, Morgan E Britton, Abbie E Smith-Ryan
{"title":"Custom Regional Segmental Lower Limb Lean Soft Tissue Analysis in Male and Female Division I Athletes.","authors":"Kelly E Joniak, Sam R Moore, Alex N Ladan, Elena I Cantu, Morgan E Britton, Abbie E Smith-Ryan","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Joniak, KE, Moore, SR, Ladan, AN, Cantu, EI, Britton, ME, and Smith-Ryan, AE. Custom regional segmental lower limb lean soft tissue analysis in male and female division I athletes. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2025-Asymmetries in lean soft tissue (LST) may affect athlete availability and injury risk. Segmental custom regions of interest (C-ROI) analyses may reveal LST differences that could go undetected by whole limb analysis using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The purpose of the study was to describe a novel C-ROI LST segmental analysis method using DXA, and to characterize asymmetry across the sample and identify meaningful difference cut points for C-ROI segmental analyses in elite athletes. Full-body DXA testing was performed on 581 NCAA Division I athletes (46% female, mean ± SD; Age = 20.2 ± 1.4 years, weight = 83.3 ± 26.0 kg) from August 2015 to July 2023. Custom regions of interest analyses were completed for glute, thigh, and calf segments on each leg. Regional percent differences ([segment LST difference]/[total segment LST/2] × 100) were calculated and meaningful differences were established from mean and standard deviations between limbs of each segment. The C-ROI method demonstrated high inter-reliability at each segment (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.874-0.999). Average LST segmental limb differences for male athletes were (mean ± SD): glute = 1.4 ± 4.4%, thigh = 0.3 ± 2.9%, calf = 0.6 ± 4.7%; and for female athletes: glute = 2.0 ± 4.4%, thigh = 0.3 ± 4.2%, calf = 0.8 ± 4.6%. Values >2 standard deviations for male athletes (glute: 10.2%, thigh: 6.1%, calf: 9.9%) and female athletes (glute: 10.9%, thigh: 8.6%, calf: 10.0%) seemed to be clinically meaningful. Using meaningful regional difference cut points may provide staff (i.e., athletic trainers, dietitians, and strength coaches) insight into acceptable LST asymmetries to better support athlete performance and return to play.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005129","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract: Joniak, KE, Moore, SR, Ladan, AN, Cantu, EI, Britton, ME, and Smith-Ryan, AE. Custom regional segmental lower limb lean soft tissue analysis in male and female division I athletes. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2025-Asymmetries in lean soft tissue (LST) may affect athlete availability and injury risk. Segmental custom regions of interest (C-ROI) analyses may reveal LST differences that could go undetected by whole limb analysis using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The purpose of the study was to describe a novel C-ROI LST segmental analysis method using DXA, and to characterize asymmetry across the sample and identify meaningful difference cut points for C-ROI segmental analyses in elite athletes. Full-body DXA testing was performed on 581 NCAA Division I athletes (46% female, mean ± SD; Age = 20.2 ± 1.4 years, weight = 83.3 ± 26.0 kg) from August 2015 to July 2023. Custom regions of interest analyses were completed for glute, thigh, and calf segments on each leg. Regional percent differences ([segment LST difference]/[total segment LST/2] × 100) were calculated and meaningful differences were established from mean and standard deviations between limbs of each segment. The C-ROI method demonstrated high inter-reliability at each segment (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.874-0.999). Average LST segmental limb differences for male athletes were (mean ± SD): glute = 1.4 ± 4.4%, thigh = 0.3 ± 2.9%, calf = 0.6 ± 4.7%; and for female athletes: glute = 2.0 ± 4.4%, thigh = 0.3 ± 4.2%, calf = 0.8 ± 4.6%. Values >2 standard deviations for male athletes (glute: 10.2%, thigh: 6.1%, calf: 9.9%) and female athletes (glute: 10.9%, thigh: 8.6%, calf: 10.0%) seemed to be clinically meaningful. Using meaningful regional difference cut points may provide staff (i.e., athletic trainers, dietitians, and strength coaches) insight into acceptable LST asymmetries to better support athlete performance and return to play.
期刊介绍:
The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.