Custom Regional Segmental Lower Limb Lean Soft Tissue Analysis in Male and Female Division I Athletes.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Kelly E Joniak, Sam R Moore, Alex N Ladan, Elena I Cantu, Morgan E Britton, Abbie E Smith-Ryan
{"title":"Custom Regional Segmental Lower Limb Lean Soft Tissue Analysis in Male and Female Division I Athletes.","authors":"Kelly E Joniak, Sam R Moore, Alex N Ladan, Elena I Cantu, Morgan E Britton, Abbie E Smith-Ryan","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Joniak, KE, Moore, SR, Ladan, AN, Cantu, EI, Britton, ME, and Smith-Ryan, AE. Custom regional segmental lower limb lean soft tissue analysis in male and female division I athletes. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2025-Asymmetries in lean soft tissue (LST) may affect athlete availability and injury risk. Segmental custom regions of interest (C-ROI) analyses may reveal LST differences that could go undetected by whole limb analysis using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The purpose of the study was to describe a novel C-ROI LST segmental analysis method using DXA, and to characterize asymmetry across the sample and identify meaningful difference cut points for C-ROI segmental analyses in elite athletes. Full-body DXA testing was performed on 581 NCAA Division I athletes (46% female, mean ± SD; Age = 20.2 ± 1.4 years, weight = 83.3 ± 26.0 kg) from August 2015 to July 2023. Custom regions of interest analyses were completed for glute, thigh, and calf segments on each leg. Regional percent differences ([segment LST difference]/[total segment LST/2] × 100) were calculated and meaningful differences were established from mean and standard deviations between limbs of each segment. The C-ROI method demonstrated high inter-reliability at each segment (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.874-0.999). Average LST segmental limb differences for male athletes were (mean ± SD): glute = 1.4 ± 4.4%, thigh = 0.3 ± 2.9%, calf = 0.6 ± 4.7%; and for female athletes: glute = 2.0 ± 4.4%, thigh = 0.3 ± 4.2%, calf = 0.8 ± 4.6%. Values >2 standard deviations for male athletes (glute: 10.2%, thigh: 6.1%, calf: 9.9%) and female athletes (glute: 10.9%, thigh: 8.6%, calf: 10.0%) seemed to be clinically meaningful. Using meaningful regional difference cut points may provide staff (i.e., athletic trainers, dietitians, and strength coaches) insight into acceptable LST asymmetries to better support athlete performance and return to play.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005129","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Joniak, KE, Moore, SR, Ladan, AN, Cantu, EI, Britton, ME, and Smith-Ryan, AE. Custom regional segmental lower limb lean soft tissue analysis in male and female division I athletes. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2025-Asymmetries in lean soft tissue (LST) may affect athlete availability and injury risk. Segmental custom regions of interest (C-ROI) analyses may reveal LST differences that could go undetected by whole limb analysis using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The purpose of the study was to describe a novel C-ROI LST segmental analysis method using DXA, and to characterize asymmetry across the sample and identify meaningful difference cut points for C-ROI segmental analyses in elite athletes. Full-body DXA testing was performed on 581 NCAA Division I athletes (46% female, mean ± SD; Age = 20.2 ± 1.4 years, weight = 83.3 ± 26.0 kg) from August 2015 to July 2023. Custom regions of interest analyses were completed for glute, thigh, and calf segments on each leg. Regional percent differences ([segment LST difference]/[total segment LST/2] × 100) were calculated and meaningful differences were established from mean and standard deviations between limbs of each segment. The C-ROI method demonstrated high inter-reliability at each segment (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.874-0.999). Average LST segmental limb differences for male athletes were (mean ± SD): glute = 1.4 ± 4.4%, thigh = 0.3 ± 2.9%, calf = 0.6 ± 4.7%; and for female athletes: glute = 2.0 ± 4.4%, thigh = 0.3 ± 4.2%, calf = 0.8 ± 4.6%. Values >2 standard deviations for male athletes (glute: 10.2%, thigh: 6.1%, calf: 9.9%) and female athletes (glute: 10.9%, thigh: 8.6%, calf: 10.0%) seemed to be clinically meaningful. Using meaningful regional difference cut points may provide staff (i.e., athletic trainers, dietitians, and strength coaches) insight into acceptable LST asymmetries to better support athlete performance and return to play.

男性和女性一级运动员下肢瘦软组织的定制区域节段性分析。
摘要:Joniak, KE, Moore, SR, Ladan, AN, Cantu, EI, Britton, ME和Smith-Ryan, AE。男性和女性一级运动员下肢瘦软组织的定制区域节段性分析。[J] .中国肌肉科学,2011,30(3):557 - 557 - 557。节段自定义感兴趣区域(C-ROI)分析可以揭示使用双能x射线吸收仪(DXA)的全肢分析无法检测到的LST差异。本研究的目的是描述一种使用DXA的新型C-ROI LST分段分析方法,并表征样本中的不对称性,并确定精英运动员C-ROI分段分析的有意义的差异切割点。对581名NCAA一级运动员进行全身DXA检测(女性46%,平均±SD;年龄= 20.2±1.4岁,体重= 83.3±26.0 kg, 2015年8月- 2023年7月。对每条腿上的臀肌、大腿和小腿段进行定制感兴趣区域分析。计算区域百分比差异([分段LST差异]/[总分段LST/2] × 100),通过各分段分支间的均值和标准差建立有意义的差异。C-ROI法在各段具有较高的互信度(类内相关系数为0.874 ~ 0.999)。男性运动员LST节段肢体平均差异为(mean±SD):臀肌= 1.4±4.4%,大腿= 0.3±2.9%,小腿= 0.6±4.7%;女性运动员:臀肌= 2.0±4.4%,大腿= 0.3±4.2%,小腿= 0.8±4.6%。男性运动员(臀肌:10.2%,大腿:6.1%,小腿:9.9%)和女性运动员(臀肌:10.9%,大腿:8.6%,小腿:10.0%)的值bbb20 2个标准差似乎具有临床意义。使用有意义的区域差异切割点可以为工作人员(即运动教练,营养师和力量教练)提供可接受的LST不对称的见解,以更好地支持运动员的表现和恢复比赛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信