Income inequality depresses support for higher minimum wages.

IF 3.5 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-29 DOI:10.1037/xge0001772
Daniela Goya-Tocchetto, M Asher Lawson, Shai Davidai, Richard P Larrick, B Keith Payne
{"title":"Income inequality depresses support for higher minimum wages.","authors":"Daniela Goya-Tocchetto, M Asher Lawson, Shai Davidai, Richard P Larrick, B Keith Payne","doi":"10.1037/xge0001772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The minimum wage can be an effective policy tool for mitigating economic inequality, but public demand for higher minimum wages has not kept up with rising levels of income disparities. In our first study using protest attendance data over a six-and-a-half-year period in the United States (<i>N</i> = 130,562), we find evidence that higher economic inequality was associated with fewer and less well-attended protests targeted at changing economic conditions and raising minimum wages. We corroborate this finding across eight laboratory experiments (<i>N</i> = 7,286)-including a U.S. nationally representative sample-finding causal evidence that higher levels of income inequality decrease support for higher minimum wages. We propose that this decreased support results from a psychological tendency to engage in \"is-to-ought\" reasoning, where individuals use information about how much people actually earn to determine how much they <i>should</i> earn. We conclude by introducing an intervention to mitigate the effects of this phenomenon and discuss implications for policy communication. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":" ","pages":"2138-2157"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001772","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The minimum wage can be an effective policy tool for mitigating economic inequality, but public demand for higher minimum wages has not kept up with rising levels of income disparities. In our first study using protest attendance data over a six-and-a-half-year period in the United States (N = 130,562), we find evidence that higher economic inequality was associated with fewer and less well-attended protests targeted at changing economic conditions and raising minimum wages. We corroborate this finding across eight laboratory experiments (N = 7,286)-including a U.S. nationally representative sample-finding causal evidence that higher levels of income inequality decrease support for higher minimum wages. We propose that this decreased support results from a psychological tendency to engage in "is-to-ought" reasoning, where individuals use information about how much people actually earn to determine how much they should earn. We conclude by introducing an intervention to mitigate the effects of this phenomenon and discuss implications for policy communication. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

收入不平等抑制了对提高最低工资的支持。
最低工资可以成为缓解经济不平等的有效政策工具,但公众对提高最低工资的要求并没有跟上收入差距不断扩大的步伐。在我们的第一项研究中,我们使用了美国六年半期间的抗议人数数据(N = 130,562),我们发现证据表明,经济不平等加剧与旨在改变经济状况和提高最低工资的抗议人数越来越少有关。我们通过8个实验室实验(N = 7286)证实了这一发现,其中包括一个具有美国全国代表性的样本,发现收入不平等程度越高,对提高最低工资的支持就越少。我们认为,这种支持度下降的原因是一种从事“是-应该”推理的心理倾向,即个人使用有关实际收入的信息来确定他们应该赚多少钱。最后,我们引入了一种干预措施来减轻这一现象的影响,并讨论了对政策沟通的影响。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.90%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Psychology: General publishes articles describing empirical work that bridges the traditional interests of two or more communities of psychology. The work may touch on issues dealt with in JEP: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, JEP: Human Perception and Performance, JEP: Animal Behavior Processes, or JEP: Applied, but may also concern issues in other subdisciplines of psychology, including social processes, developmental processes, psychopathology, neuroscience, or computational modeling. Articles in JEP: General may be longer than the usual journal publication if necessary, but shorter articles that bridge subdisciplines will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信