Thirdhand Smoke Exposes Children Living with Smokers and Nonsmokers to Tobacco Smoke Toxicants: Racial, Income, and Housing Disparities in Hand Nicotine and Saliva Cotinine Levels.

IF 10.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
E Melinda Mahabee-Gittens, Ashley L Merianos, Nicolas Lopez-Galvez, Penelope J E Quintana, Eunha Hoh, Nathan G Dodder, Lara Stone, Chase A Wullenweber, Georg E Matt
{"title":"Thirdhand Smoke Exposes Children Living with Smokers and Nonsmokers to Tobacco Smoke Toxicants: Racial, Income, and Housing Disparities in Hand Nicotine and Saliva Cotinine Levels.","authors":"E Melinda Mahabee-Gittens, Ashley L Merianos, Nicolas Lopez-Galvez, Penelope J E Quintana, Eunha Hoh, Nathan G Dodder, Lara Stone, Chase A Wullenweber, Georg E Matt","doi":"10.1289/EHP16332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children may be involuntarily exposed to chemical residue from thirdhand tobacco smoke (THS) in environments where tobacco has previously been used. Factors contributing to this exposure among children of nonsmokers with no known secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure are currently unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand the contribution of THS residue to the overall tobacco smoke exposure (TSE) among children of nonsmokers and smokers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of parents and their children (≤11 years; N=1013) at a children's hospital in the US. Hand nicotine (HN) and saliva cotinine (SC) were markers of THS pollution and TSE, respectively. Children were considered protected from tobacco smoke if there were no household smokers or vapers, strict household smoking bans, and no SHS exposure during the past week. Cluster-adjusted regression models were used to test hypotheses about HN and SC levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 94.5% and 98.9% of protected and unprotected children had detectable HN, respectively. Children who were Black and protected (GeoM= 6.0 ng/wipe; 95%CI=[3.8, 9.1]) or unprotected (GeoM= 43.8 ng/wipe; 95%CI=[33.6; 57.1]) had approximately three times higher HN levels than children who were White and protected (GeoM= 1.8 ng/wipe; 95%CI=1.6; 2.0]) or unprotected (GeoM= 15.0 ng/wipe; 95%CI=[11.2; 19.8]). Unprotected children whose parents had ≤high school education had HN levels that were almost 12 times higher (87.8 ng/wipe) than unprotected children of parents who graduated college (7.5 ng/wipe). Unprotected children with ≤$15,000 household income had HN levels >25 times higher (73.3 ng/wipe) than unprotected children with >$90,000 income (≤ 2.8 ng/wipe). Household smoking bans were unsuccessful in lowering HN levels in Black children, but they were successful for White children (χ<sup>2</sup>(3)=12.7, p<0.01). HN was associated with SC in children with no SHS exposure (βˆ= 0.10), with stronger associations in the presence of 1 (βˆ= 0.28) and 2+ active smokers (βˆ= 0.32; all p<0.01).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>THS is a pervasive source of exposure to tobacco smoke pollutants. Stark disparities were noted, with higher exposure in Black and lower income children. Findings provide the strongest evidence to date on the contribution of THS as a significant source of overall TSE in children. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP16332.</p>","PeriodicalId":11862,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health Perspectives","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP16332","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Children may be involuntarily exposed to chemical residue from thirdhand tobacco smoke (THS) in environments where tobacco has previously been used. Factors contributing to this exposure among children of nonsmokers with no known secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure are currently unknown.

Objective: To understand the contribution of THS residue to the overall tobacco smoke exposure (TSE) among children of nonsmokers and smokers.

Methods: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of parents and their children (≤11 years; N=1013) at a children's hospital in the US. Hand nicotine (HN) and saliva cotinine (SC) were markers of THS pollution and TSE, respectively. Children were considered protected from tobacco smoke if there were no household smokers or vapers, strict household smoking bans, and no SHS exposure during the past week. Cluster-adjusted regression models were used to test hypotheses about HN and SC levels.

Results: Overall, 94.5% and 98.9% of protected and unprotected children had detectable HN, respectively. Children who were Black and protected (GeoM= 6.0 ng/wipe; 95%CI=[3.8, 9.1]) or unprotected (GeoM= 43.8 ng/wipe; 95%CI=[33.6; 57.1]) had approximately three times higher HN levels than children who were White and protected (GeoM= 1.8 ng/wipe; 95%CI=1.6; 2.0]) or unprotected (GeoM= 15.0 ng/wipe; 95%CI=[11.2; 19.8]). Unprotected children whose parents had ≤high school education had HN levels that were almost 12 times higher (87.8 ng/wipe) than unprotected children of parents who graduated college (7.5 ng/wipe). Unprotected children with ≤$15,000 household income had HN levels >25 times higher (73.3 ng/wipe) than unprotected children with >$90,000 income (≤ 2.8 ng/wipe). Household smoking bans were unsuccessful in lowering HN levels in Black children, but they were successful for White children (χ2(3)=12.7, p<0.01). HN was associated with SC in children with no SHS exposure (βˆ= 0.10), with stronger associations in the presence of 1 (βˆ= 0.28) and 2+ active smokers (βˆ= 0.32; all p<0.01).

Discussion: THS is a pervasive source of exposure to tobacco smoke pollutants. Stark disparities were noted, with higher exposure in Black and lower income children. Findings provide the strongest evidence to date on the contribution of THS as a significant source of overall TSE in children. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP16332.

三手烟使与吸烟者和非吸烟者生活在一起的儿童暴露于烟草烟雾有毒物质:种族、收入和住房在手部尼古丁和唾液可替宁水平上的差异。
背景:在以前使用过烟草的环境中,儿童可能不自觉地暴露于三手烟草烟雾(THS)的化学残留物。在没有已知二手烟暴露的非吸烟者儿童中导致这种暴露的因素目前尚不清楚。目的:了解三手烟残留对非吸烟者和吸烟者儿童总体烟草烟雾暴露(TSE)的影响。方法:我们对父母及其子女进行了一项前瞻性观察队列研究(结果:总体而言,94.5%和98.9%的受保护和未受保护的儿童分别检测到HN。被保护的黑人儿童(GeoM= 6.0 ng/ml;95%CI=[3.8, 9.1])或未保护(GeoM= 43.8 ng/ml;95% ci = (33.6;[57.1])的HN水平大约是White和受保护儿童的3倍(GeoM= 1.8 ng/ml;95% ci = 1.6;2.0])或未保护(GeoM= 15.0ng/ml;95% ci = (11.2;19.8])。父母受教育程度≤高中的未受保护儿童的HN水平(87.8 ng/wipe)几乎是父母毕业于大学的未受保护儿童(7.5 ng/wipe)的12倍。家庭收入≤15,000美元的无保护儿童的HN水平(73.3 ng/wipe)比家庭收入为90,000美元的无保护儿童(≤2.8 ng/wipe)高25倍。家庭禁烟对降低黑人儿童HN水平无效,但对白人儿童有效(χ2(3)=12.7, p)注意到明显的差异,黑人和低收入家庭的孩子接触的几率更高。研究结果提供了迄今为止最有力的证据,证明三手烟是儿童总体TSE的重要来源。https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP16332。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Health Perspectives
Environmental Health Perspectives 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
388
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly peer-reviewed journal supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, part of the National Institutes of Health under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Its mission is to facilitate discussions on the connections between the environment and human health by publishing top-notch research and news. EHP ranks third in Public, Environmental, and Occupational Health, fourth in Toxicology, and fifth in Environmental Sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信