Road traffic noise and incident ischemic heart disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.3 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Environmental Epidemiology Pub Date : 2025-05-28 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1097/EE9.0000000000000400
Göran Pershagen, Andrei Pyko, Gunn Marit Aasvang, Mikael Ögren, Pekka Tiittanen, Timo Lanki, Mette Sørensen
{"title":"Road traffic noise and incident ischemic heart disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Göran Pershagen, Andrei Pyko, Gunn Marit Aasvang, Mikael Ögren, Pekka Tiittanen, Timo Lanki, Mette Sørensen","doi":"10.1097/EE9.0000000000000400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This systematic review aimed to estimate relative risks for incident ischemic heart disease (IHD), myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke in relation to long-term road traffic noise exposure and to evaluate exposure-response functions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched databases for longitudinal studies in humans on incident IHD, MI, and/or stroke, including quantitative estimates on individual exposure to residential road traffic noise based on validated models or measurements. Risk of bias was evaluated in each study based on predefined criteria. Pooled linear exposure-response functions were generated from random-effect models in meta-analyses of study-specific risk estimates. Restricted cubic spline models were used to capture potential nonlinear associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty eligible studies were identified based on more than 8.4 million individuals, mostly from Europe, including between 160,000 and 240,000 cases for each of the outcomes. Pooled relative risk estimates were 1.017 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.990, 1.044) for IHD, 1.029 (95% CI: 1.011, 1.048) for MI, and 1.025 (95% CI: 1.009, 1.041) for stroke per 10 dB L<sub>den</sub> in road traffic noise exposure. Risk estimates appeared higher in combined analyses of studies with a low risk of exposure assessment bias. Restricted cubic spline analyses of these studies showed clear risk increases with exposure for all three cardiovascular outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The evidence indicates that long-term exposure to road traffic noise increases the incidence of IHD, including MI, and stroke. Given the abundant exposure, traffic noise is a cardiovascular risk factor of public health importance. High-quality assessment of noise exposure appears essential for the risk estimation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11713,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Epidemiology","volume":"9 3","pages":"e400"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12122180/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EE9.0000000000000400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This systematic review aimed to estimate relative risks for incident ischemic heart disease (IHD), myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke in relation to long-term road traffic noise exposure and to evaluate exposure-response functions.

Methods: We systematically searched databases for longitudinal studies in humans on incident IHD, MI, and/or stroke, including quantitative estimates on individual exposure to residential road traffic noise based on validated models or measurements. Risk of bias was evaluated in each study based on predefined criteria. Pooled linear exposure-response functions were generated from random-effect models in meta-analyses of study-specific risk estimates. Restricted cubic spline models were used to capture potential nonlinear associations.

Results: Twenty eligible studies were identified based on more than 8.4 million individuals, mostly from Europe, including between 160,000 and 240,000 cases for each of the outcomes. Pooled relative risk estimates were 1.017 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.990, 1.044) for IHD, 1.029 (95% CI: 1.011, 1.048) for MI, and 1.025 (95% CI: 1.009, 1.041) for stroke per 10 dB Lden in road traffic noise exposure. Risk estimates appeared higher in combined analyses of studies with a low risk of exposure assessment bias. Restricted cubic spline analyses of these studies showed clear risk increases with exposure for all three cardiovascular outcomes.

Conclusions: The evidence indicates that long-term exposure to road traffic noise increases the incidence of IHD, including MI, and stroke. Given the abundant exposure, traffic noise is a cardiovascular risk factor of public health importance. High-quality assessment of noise exposure appears essential for the risk estimation.

道路交通噪音与缺血性心脏病、心肌梗死和中风的发生:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:本系统综述旨在评估与长期道路交通噪声暴露相关的缺血性心脏病(IHD)、心肌梗死(MI)和中风的相对风险,并评估暴露-反应函数。方法:我们系统地检索了人类IHD、MI和/或中风事件的纵向研究数据库,包括基于验证模型或测量的个体暴露于住宅道路交通噪声的定量估计。根据预先确定的标准对每项研究的偏倚风险进行评估。在研究特定风险估计的荟萃分析中,从随机效应模型中产生合并线性暴露-反应函数。限制三次样条模型用于捕获潜在的非线性关联。结果:20项符合条件的研究基于840多万人,主要来自欧洲,每种结果包括16万至24万例病例。IHD的合并相对风险估计为1.017(95%可信区间[CI]: 0.990, 1.044), MI的合并相对风险估计为1.029 (95% CI: 1.011, 1.048),道路交通噪声暴露中每10 dB Lden中风的合并相对风险估计为1.025 (95% CI: 1.009, 1.041)。在对低风险暴露评估偏倚的研究进行综合分析时,风险估计值似乎更高。这些研究的限制性三次样条分析显示,暴露对所有三种心血管结果的风险都明显增加。结论:有证据表明,长期暴露于道路交通噪音会增加IHD(包括心肌梗死)和中风的发病率。鉴于交通噪声的大量暴露,交通噪声是一个具有重要公共卫生意义的心血管危险因素。高质量的噪声暴露评估对于风险评估至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Epidemiology
Environmental Epidemiology Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
2.80%
发文量
71
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信