Evan D Feigel, Ayden McCarthy, Mita Lovalekar, Kristen J Koltun, Matthew B Bird, Brian J Martin, Jennifer N Forse, Elizabeth J Steele, AuraLea C Fain, Jodie A Wills, Tim L A Doyle, Bradley C Nindl
{"title":"Wearable-Assessed Biomechanical and Physiological Demands during Load Carriage and Tactical Mobility Tasks among Male and Female Military Personnel.","authors":"Evan D Feigel, Ayden McCarthy, Mita Lovalekar, Kristen J Koltun, Matthew B Bird, Brian J Martin, Jennifer N Forse, Elizabeth J Steele, AuraLea C Fain, Jodie A Wills, Tim L A Doyle, Bradley C Nindl","doi":"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Load carriage and tactical mobility are military tasks that pose significant risks for musculoskeletal injuries (MSKIs) in military personnel. This investigation compared biomechanical and physiological demands of a load carriage and tactical mobility task and examined their differences between sexes using reliable and validated wearables among United States Marine officer candidates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-one candidates (16 women) performed a 15.8 km loaded ruck march and a 4.0 km endurance course that assessed load carriage and tactical mobility performance, respectively. Inertial measurement units on the distal tibia and wrist-worn watches collected biomechanical (total step count, impact load, bone stimulus, average intensity, low/medium/high g-step count) and physiological (heart rate (HRmean, HRmin, HRmax), physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE), metabolic equivalent (METmean)) data. Paired sample t-tests compared metrics between events. Principal component (PC) analyses interpreted event demands. Independent samples t-tests analyzed sex differences between PCs (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Impact load (+1259.70 g·min-1, p < 0.001), average intensity (+7.20 g, p < 0.001), bone stimulus (+126.73 A.U., p < 0.001), high-g steps (+559.34 g, p < 0.001), HRmin (+13.15 bpm, p < 0.001), HRmean (+28.79 bpm, p < 0.001), HRmax (+16.95 bpm, p < 0.001), and METmean (-1.93 kcal·kg-1·h-1, p < 0.001) were higher during the endurance course than ruck; step count (-14934, p < 0.001) and PAEE (-713 kcal, p < 0.001) were lower. Three PCs explained 84.3% and 81.5% of variance for the ruck and endurance course. PC1 represented biomechanical variables, PC2 physiological variables, and PC3 g-step count. Sex differences were found in PC2 (p = 0.039) and PC3 (p = 0.002) for ruck, and PC3 (p < 0.01) for endurance course revealing greater demands in women.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tactical mobility requires greater biomechanical and physiological demands than load carriage and places greater demands on women. Task and sex-specific training strategies may improve performance and mitigate MSKI risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":18426,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003770","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Load carriage and tactical mobility are military tasks that pose significant risks for musculoskeletal injuries (MSKIs) in military personnel. This investigation compared biomechanical and physiological demands of a load carriage and tactical mobility task and examined their differences between sexes using reliable and validated wearables among United States Marine officer candidates.
Methods: Forty-one candidates (16 women) performed a 15.8 km loaded ruck march and a 4.0 km endurance course that assessed load carriage and tactical mobility performance, respectively. Inertial measurement units on the distal tibia and wrist-worn watches collected biomechanical (total step count, impact load, bone stimulus, average intensity, low/medium/high g-step count) and physiological (heart rate (HRmean, HRmin, HRmax), physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE), metabolic equivalent (METmean)) data. Paired sample t-tests compared metrics between events. Principal component (PC) analyses interpreted event demands. Independent samples t-tests analyzed sex differences between PCs (α = 0.05).
Results: Impact load (+1259.70 g·min-1, p < 0.001), average intensity (+7.20 g, p < 0.001), bone stimulus (+126.73 A.U., p < 0.001), high-g steps (+559.34 g, p < 0.001), HRmin (+13.15 bpm, p < 0.001), HRmean (+28.79 bpm, p < 0.001), HRmax (+16.95 bpm, p < 0.001), and METmean (-1.93 kcal·kg-1·h-1, p < 0.001) were higher during the endurance course than ruck; step count (-14934, p < 0.001) and PAEE (-713 kcal, p < 0.001) were lower. Three PCs explained 84.3% and 81.5% of variance for the ruck and endurance course. PC1 represented biomechanical variables, PC2 physiological variables, and PC3 g-step count. Sex differences were found in PC2 (p = 0.039) and PC3 (p = 0.002) for ruck, and PC3 (p < 0.01) for endurance course revealing greater demands in women.
Conclusions: Tactical mobility requires greater biomechanical and physiological demands than load carriage and places greater demands on women. Task and sex-specific training strategies may improve performance and mitigate MSKI risk.
期刊介绍:
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise® features original investigations, clinical studies, and comprehensive reviews on current topics in sports medicine and exercise science. With this leading multidisciplinary journal, exercise physiologists, physiatrists, physical therapists, team physicians, and athletic trainers get a vital exchange of information from basic and applied science, medicine, education, and allied health fields.