Risk Factors for Fatal and Near-Fatal Food Anaphylaxis: Analysis of the Allergy-Vigilance Network Database.

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
Guillaume Pouessel, Claire Egea, Amandine Divaret-Chauveau, Pascale Beaumont, Eléna Bradatan, Pascale Dumond, Rémy Diesnis, Sélina Tscheiller, Xavier Van der Brempt, Camille Braun, Dominique Sabouraud-Leclerc
{"title":"Risk Factors for Fatal and Near-Fatal Food Anaphylaxis: Analysis of the Allergy-Vigilance Network Database.","authors":"Guillaume Pouessel, Claire Egea, Amandine Divaret-Chauveau, Pascale Beaumont, Eléna Bradatan, Pascale Dumond, Rémy Diesnis, Sélina Tscheiller, Xavier Van der Brempt, Camille Braun, Dominique Sabouraud-Leclerc","doi":"10.1111/cea.70089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gaining a better understanding of the risk factors for severe anaphylaxis represents a crucial challenge for physicians. This survey aimed to analyse cases of severe food anaphylaxis and assess potential risk factors for severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analysed food anaphylaxis cases recorded by the French-speaking Allergy-Vigilance Network (2002-2021) and compared the main characteristics of grade 3 (Ring classification) and grade 4 cases using univariate and multivariate statistical analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2621 food anaphylaxis cases reported, 731 (27.9%) were considered severe (grade 3, n = 687 [94%] and grade 4, n = 44 [6%]; 19 deaths). Overall, 56.1% of cases were adults (mean age: 28.3 years) and 53.7% were male. The most frequent triggers were peanut (13.9%), wheat (9.4%), cashew (5.8%), shrimp (5.3%), and cow's milk (4.6%). More grade 4 anaphylaxis cases occurred in children than in adults (26 vs. 18; p = 0.01). In univariate analysis, individuals with grade 4 anaphylaxis were more likely to have a history of allergy to the culprit food (71.1% vs. 42.1%; p < 0.001), asthma diagnosis (59.5% vs. 30.4%; p < 0.001), and peanut as the culprit food (34.1% vs. 12.6%; p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, factors predictive of grade 4 anaphylaxis were asthma diagnosis (OR [95% CI]: 3.41 [1.56-7.44]; p = 0.002) and peanut as the culprit trigger (OR [95% CI]: 3.46 [1.28-9.34]; p = 0.014).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data highlight the risk factors for severe food anaphylaxis, notably a history of asthma and peanut as the culprit food. These individuals should benefit from personalised management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10207,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Allergy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.70089","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gaining a better understanding of the risk factors for severe anaphylaxis represents a crucial challenge for physicians. This survey aimed to analyse cases of severe food anaphylaxis and assess potential risk factors for severity.

Methods: We retrospectively analysed food anaphylaxis cases recorded by the French-speaking Allergy-Vigilance Network (2002-2021) and compared the main characteristics of grade 3 (Ring classification) and grade 4 cases using univariate and multivariate statistical analyses.

Results: Of the 2621 food anaphylaxis cases reported, 731 (27.9%) were considered severe (grade 3, n = 687 [94%] and grade 4, n = 44 [6%]; 19 deaths). Overall, 56.1% of cases were adults (mean age: 28.3 years) and 53.7% were male. The most frequent triggers were peanut (13.9%), wheat (9.4%), cashew (5.8%), shrimp (5.3%), and cow's milk (4.6%). More grade 4 anaphylaxis cases occurred in children than in adults (26 vs. 18; p = 0.01). In univariate analysis, individuals with grade 4 anaphylaxis were more likely to have a history of allergy to the culprit food (71.1% vs. 42.1%; p < 0.001), asthma diagnosis (59.5% vs. 30.4%; p < 0.001), and peanut as the culprit food (34.1% vs. 12.6%; p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, factors predictive of grade 4 anaphylaxis were asthma diagnosis (OR [95% CI]: 3.41 [1.56-7.44]; p = 0.002) and peanut as the culprit trigger (OR [95% CI]: 3.46 [1.28-9.34]; p = 0.014).

Conclusions: Our data highlight the risk factors for severe food anaphylaxis, notably a history of asthma and peanut as the culprit food. These individuals should benefit from personalised management strategies.

致死性和接近致死性食物过敏反应的危险因素:过敏症警戒网络数据库的分析。
背景:更好地了解严重过敏反应的危险因素对医生来说是一个至关重要的挑战。本调查旨在分析严重食物过敏的病例,并评估严重程度的潜在危险因素。方法:回顾性分析法语过敏症警戒网络(2002-2021)记录的食物过敏反应病例,采用单因素和多因素统计分析比较3级(Ring分类)和4级病例的主要特征。结果:在2621例报告的食物过敏反应病例中,731例(27.9%)被认为是严重的(3级,n = 687[94%], 4级,n = 44 [6%];19人死亡)。总体而言,56.1%的病例为成年人(平均年龄28.3岁),53.7%为男性。最常见的诱发因素是花生(13.9%)、小麦(9.4%)、腰果(5.8%)、虾(5.3%)和牛奶(4.6%)。儿童发生的4级过敏反应病例多于成人(26例对18例;p = 0.01)。在单变量分析中,4级过敏反应患者更有可能对罪魁祸首食物有过敏史(71.1%对42.1%;结论:我们的数据强调了严重食物过敏反应的危险因素,特别是哮喘史和花生作为罪魁祸首的食物。这些人应该从个性化的管理策略中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
9.80%
发文量
189
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical & Experimental Allergy strikes an excellent balance between clinical and scientific articles and carries regular reviews and editorials written by leading authorities in their field. In response to the increasing number of quality submissions, since 1996 the journals size has increased by over 30%. Clinical & Experimental Allergy is essential reading for allergy practitioners and research scientists with an interest in allergic diseases and mechanisms. Truly international in appeal, Clinical & Experimental Allergy publishes clinical and experimental observations in disease in all fields of medicine in which allergic hypersensitivity plays a part.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信