Validation of the Mild Behavioral Impairment Scale (MBI-S) for brief self-assessment of Mild Behavioral Impairment in people without dementia.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Paula Hinkl, Elmar Graessel, Nicolas Rohleder, Peter Landendoerfer, Thomas Kuehlein, Natascha Lauer, Anna Pendergrass
{"title":"Validation of the Mild Behavioral Impairment Scale (MBI-S) for brief self-assessment of Mild Behavioral Impairment in people without dementia.","authors":"Paula Hinkl, Elmar Graessel, Nicolas Rohleder, Peter Landendoerfer, Thomas Kuehlein, Natascha Lauer, Anna Pendergrass","doi":"10.1186/s12991-025-00566-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Mild Behavioral Impairment (MBI) are important constructs in the context of cognitive decline. MBI can be assessed with the Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist (MBI-C). However, the instrument has deficits in psychometrics and content, thus indicating a need for improvement. The aim of this study was to develop a complementary short instrument, the Mild Behavioral Impairment Scale (MBI-S), designed to measure MBI as a short-term modifiable state criterion, and to validate it in a non-clinical sample of people 18 years of age or older.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Most of the items on the MBI-S stem from the MBI-C and were chosen to represent the dimensions of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire. The MBI-S was validated on self-reported data from 175 individuals. In an item analysis, the discriminatory power and item difficulties were examined. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to assess the internal consistency, and a principal component analysis was conducted to determine the structure of the instrument. Construct validity was established by testing four hypotheses about relationships between the MBI-S and other instruments by calculating correlation coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the item analysis, two items were removed from the final version of the scale on the basis of insufficient discriminatory power and the finding that the internal consistency of the total score increased when the items were deleted. The principal component analysis yielded a single-component structure for the MBI-S. Two more items were excluded from the scale due to insufficiently low loadings on the extracted component. Cronbach's alpha for the final eight-item scale was 0.79. The final MBI-S score was strongly related to that of the MBI-C and a loneliness score as well as moderately related to maladaptive coping. There was no association with respondents' level of education.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MBI-S is a valid short instrument for the assessment of MBI. It has high test economy and measures current neuropsychiatric symptoms and their intensity as a state criterion. Therefore, the MBI-S can be used for the longitudinal measurement of MBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":7942,"journal":{"name":"Annals of General Psychiatry","volume":"24 1","pages":"35"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12123818/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of General Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12991-025-00566-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Mild Behavioral Impairment (MBI) are important constructs in the context of cognitive decline. MBI can be assessed with the Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist (MBI-C). However, the instrument has deficits in psychometrics and content, thus indicating a need for improvement. The aim of this study was to develop a complementary short instrument, the Mild Behavioral Impairment Scale (MBI-S), designed to measure MBI as a short-term modifiable state criterion, and to validate it in a non-clinical sample of people 18 years of age or older.

Methods: Most of the items on the MBI-S stem from the MBI-C and were chosen to represent the dimensions of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire. The MBI-S was validated on self-reported data from 175 individuals. In an item analysis, the discriminatory power and item difficulties were examined. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to assess the internal consistency, and a principal component analysis was conducted to determine the structure of the instrument. Construct validity was established by testing four hypotheses about relationships between the MBI-S and other instruments by calculating correlation coefficients.

Results: After the item analysis, two items were removed from the final version of the scale on the basis of insufficient discriminatory power and the finding that the internal consistency of the total score increased when the items were deleted. The principal component analysis yielded a single-component structure for the MBI-S. Two more items were excluded from the scale due to insufficiently low loadings on the extracted component. Cronbach's alpha for the final eight-item scale was 0.79. The final MBI-S score was strongly related to that of the MBI-C and a loneliness score as well as moderately related to maladaptive coping. There was no association with respondents' level of education.

Conclusion: The MBI-S is a valid short instrument for the assessment of MBI. It has high test economy and measures current neuropsychiatric symptoms and their intensity as a state criterion. Therefore, the MBI-S can be used for the longitudinal measurement of MBI.

轻度行为障碍量表(MBI-S)用于无痴呆患者轻度行为障碍简要自我评估的验证。
背景:轻度认知障碍(Mild Cognitive Impairment, MCI)和轻度行为障碍(Mild Behavioral Impairment, MBI)是认知衰退的重要构念。MBI可以用轻度行为障碍检查表(MBI- c)来评估。然而,该工具在心理测量学和内容方面存在缺陷,因此表明需要改进。本研究的目的是开发一种补充性的短期工具,轻度行为障碍量表(MBI- s),旨在将MBI作为一种短期可修改的状态标准来测量,并在18岁或以上的非临床样本中进行验证。方法:MBI-S上的大部分项目来源于MBI-C,并被选择来代表神经精神量表的维度。175个人的自我报告数据验证了MBI-S。在项目分析中,考察了区分力和项目难度。计算Cronbach's alpha以评估内部一致性,并进行主成分分析以确定仪器的结构。通过计算相关系数,对MBI-S与其他工具之间关系的四个假设进行检验,从而确定结构效度。结果:经过项目分析,基于歧视力不足和删除总分内部一致性增加的发现,从最终版本的量表中删除了两个项目。主成分分析得到了MBI-S的单成分结构。由于提取成分的负荷不够低,另外两个项目被排除在量表之外。最终八项量表的Cronbach's alpha为0.79。最终的MBI-S得分与MBI-C得分和孤独感得分呈强相关,与适应不良应对呈正相关。这与被调查者的教育水平无关。结论:MBI- s是一种有效的评价MBI的短期工具。它具有较高的测试经济性,是衡量当前神经精神症状及其强度的国家标准。因此,MBI- s可以用于MBI的纵向测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.70%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of General Psychiatry considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychiatry, including neuroscience and psychological medicine. Both basic and clinical neuroscience contributions are encouraged. Annals of General Psychiatry emphasizes a biopsychosocial approach to illness and health and strongly supports and follows the principles of evidence-based medicine. As an open access journal, Annals of General Psychiatry facilitates the worldwide distribution of high quality psychiatry and mental health research. The journal considers submissions on a wide range of topics including, but not limited to, psychopharmacology, forensic psychiatry, psychotic disorders, psychiatric genetics, and mood and anxiety disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信