Data, dialogue, and design: patient and public involvement and engagement for natural language processing with real-world cancer data.

IF 3.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in digital health Pub Date : 2025-05-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1560757
Wuraola Oyewusi, Eliana M Vasquez Osorio, Goran Nenadic, Issy MacGregor, Gareth Price
{"title":"Data, dialogue, and design: patient and public involvement and engagement for natural language processing with real-world cancer data.","authors":"Wuraola Oyewusi, Eliana M Vasquez Osorio, Goran Nenadic, Issy MacGregor, Gareth Price","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2025.1560757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study describes the process and outcomes of a Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) event designed to incorporate patient perspectives into the application of Natural Language Processing (NLP) for analyzing unstructured free-text cancer medical notes. The analysis of routinely collected data aims to provide evidence to support clinical decision making in patient groups that are often under-represented in conventional clinical trials, highlighting the critical role of PPIE in responsibly implementing AI within healthcare. The study focuses on ensuring that NLP research reflects patient-centered and clinically relevant considerations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The event involved 13 participants: nine cancer survivors and caregivers, acting as contributors, and four researchers. These participants engaged in focus group discussions on three key topics: data use, consent preferences, and communication strategies for this type of research.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Some key findings included that two-thirds (6/9) of contributors preferred a national opt-out consent model for data use, while one-third (3/9) favored project-specific consent. They offered perspectives on data use, including how it is processed and stored. They also highlighted the importance of clear, accessible information about the research process to build trust and facilitate informed decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":73078,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in digital health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1560757"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12119481/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1560757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study describes the process and outcomes of a Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) event designed to incorporate patient perspectives into the application of Natural Language Processing (NLP) for analyzing unstructured free-text cancer medical notes. The analysis of routinely collected data aims to provide evidence to support clinical decision making in patient groups that are often under-represented in conventional clinical trials, highlighting the critical role of PPIE in responsibly implementing AI within healthcare. The study focuses on ensuring that NLP research reflects patient-centered and clinically relevant considerations.

Methods: The event involved 13 participants: nine cancer survivors and caregivers, acting as contributors, and four researchers. These participants engaged in focus group discussions on three key topics: data use, consent preferences, and communication strategies for this type of research.

Results: Some key findings included that two-thirds (6/9) of contributors preferred a national opt-out consent model for data use, while one-third (3/9) favored project-specific consent. They offered perspectives on data use, including how it is processed and stored. They also highlighted the importance of clear, accessible information about the research process to build trust and facilitate informed decision-making.

数据,对话和设计:患者和公众参与和参与自然语言处理与现实世界的癌症数据。
本研究描述了一个患者和公众参与和参与(PPIE)事件的过程和结果,该事件旨在将患者的观点纳入自然语言处理(NLP)的应用中,以分析非结构化的自由文本癌症医疗记录。对常规收集的数据进行分析的目的是为在传统临床试验中代表性不足的患者群体中支持临床决策提供证据,强调PPIE在医疗保健中负责任地实施人工智能方面的关键作用。该研究的重点是确保NLP研究反映了以患者为中心和临床相关的考虑。方法:本次活动共有13名参与者:9名癌症幸存者和护理人员,作为贡献者,4名研究人员。这些参与者参与了三个关键主题的焦点小组讨论:数据使用、同意偏好和此类研究的沟通策略。结果:一些关键的发现包括三分之二(6/9)的贡献者更喜欢国家选择退出数据使用的同意模式,而三分之一(3/9)的人更喜欢特定项目的同意。他们提供了关于数据使用的观点,包括如何处理和存储数据。他们还强调了关于研究过程的清晰、可获取的信息对于建立信任和促进知情决策的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信