{"title":"The wicked problem of otitis media: summary of recent systematic reviews on otitis media with effusion.","authors":"Hasantha Gunasekera","doi":"10.1016/j.prrv.2025.04.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Otitis media (OM) is a wicked problem. Millennia ago, middle ear disease was described in the ancient Egyptian Ebers Papyrus and Indian Sushruta Samhit ('Compendium'). Centuries ago, Italian anatomists (Bartholomaeus Eustachius ∼ 1563; and Antonio Valsalva ∼ 1704) described the structures and technique for draining middle ear pus that still bear their names. Recently, immunological studies have broadened our understanding of the important inflammatory and immune responses in middle ear disease. Despite all of this knowledge, we have made no real progress eliminating this disease that nearly every child will still experience, although the severe life threatening forms are much less common. Colonised High Income Countries have recorded evidence of middle ear disease among the indigenous populations for centuries and the massive disparities in disease burden persist. We have made little progress, indeed may have gone backwards, managing OM with priority populations, such as First Nations children. More broadly, OM is one of the commonest reasons for children to attend healthcare, be prescribed antibiotics and undergo surgery. Therefore, it has a significant impact on health-spending and antibiotic resistance as well as morbidity for children, including hearing impairment, balance disturbance, behavioural disruption, speech and language and other delays with all the consequent life-course impacts, including justice system contact. Perhaps OM is not eradicable, but we must do better to contain the recurrent, persistent and severe forms.</p>","PeriodicalId":19658,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric Respiratory Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatric Respiratory Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prrv.2025.04.008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Otitis media (OM) is a wicked problem. Millennia ago, middle ear disease was described in the ancient Egyptian Ebers Papyrus and Indian Sushruta Samhit ('Compendium'). Centuries ago, Italian anatomists (Bartholomaeus Eustachius ∼ 1563; and Antonio Valsalva ∼ 1704) described the structures and technique for draining middle ear pus that still bear their names. Recently, immunological studies have broadened our understanding of the important inflammatory and immune responses in middle ear disease. Despite all of this knowledge, we have made no real progress eliminating this disease that nearly every child will still experience, although the severe life threatening forms are much less common. Colonised High Income Countries have recorded evidence of middle ear disease among the indigenous populations for centuries and the massive disparities in disease burden persist. We have made little progress, indeed may have gone backwards, managing OM with priority populations, such as First Nations children. More broadly, OM is one of the commonest reasons for children to attend healthcare, be prescribed antibiotics and undergo surgery. Therefore, it has a significant impact on health-spending and antibiotic resistance as well as morbidity for children, including hearing impairment, balance disturbance, behavioural disruption, speech and language and other delays with all the consequent life-course impacts, including justice system contact. Perhaps OM is not eradicable, but we must do better to contain the recurrent, persistent and severe forms.
期刊介绍:
Paediatric Respiratory Reviews offers authors the opportunity to submit their own editorials, educational reviews and short communications on topics relevant to paediatric respiratory medicine. These peer reviewed contributions will complement the commissioned reviews which will continue to form an integral part of the journal.
Subjects covered include:
• Epidemiology
• Immunology and cell biology
• Physiology
• Occupational disorders
• The role of allergens and pollutants
A particular emphasis is given to the recommendation of "best practice" for primary care physicians and paediatricians.
Paediatric Respiratory Reviews is aimed at general paediatricians but it should also be read by specialist paediatric physicians and nurses, respiratory physicians and general practitioners.
It is a journal for those who are busy and do not have time to read systematically through literature, but who need to stay up to date in the field of paediatric respiratory and sleep medicine.