Six-country psychometric comparison of women responses to the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS) and the Child and Adolescent Behaviour Inventory (CABI) across cultures and time

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Francisco Antonio Calderón Alfaro , Jamie Lachman , Catherine L. Ward , Qing Han , Rosanne Jocson , Ivo Kunovski , Stephanie Eagling-Peche , Rumaya Juhari , Kufre Okop , Jennel Reyes , Viorel Babii , Lucie Cluver , Liane Peña Alampay , Marija Raleva , Frances Gardner
{"title":"Six-country psychometric comparison of women responses to the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS) and the Child and Adolescent Behaviour Inventory (CABI) across cultures and time","authors":"Francisco Antonio Calderón Alfaro ,&nbsp;Jamie Lachman ,&nbsp;Catherine L. Ward ,&nbsp;Qing Han ,&nbsp;Rosanne Jocson ,&nbsp;Ivo Kunovski ,&nbsp;Stephanie Eagling-Peche ,&nbsp;Rumaya Juhari ,&nbsp;Kufre Okop ,&nbsp;Jennel Reyes ,&nbsp;Viorel Babii ,&nbsp;Lucie Cluver ,&nbsp;Liane Peña Alampay ,&nbsp;Marija Raleva ,&nbsp;Frances Gardner","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2025.119524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS) and the Child and Adolescent Behaviour Inventory (CABI) are freely accessible tools used to assess depression and externalizing symptoms, respectively. There is limited psychometric evidence on how these scales hold over time and across cultures. This study aims to evaluate the internal structure of both scales and their invariance across six countries and over two timepoints.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from the ParentChat Pilot Study included information from 566 adults (85.51 % female) with children aged 2 to 17. Only female data from North Macedonia, Malaysia, Moldova, Montenegro, Philippines, and South Africa were used. Confirmatory factor analysis was employed to assess invariance of each construct.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At baseline, the DASS depression subscale achieved scalar invariance across five countries (CFI = 0.973, TLI = 0.956, RMSEA = 0.060, SRMR = 0.069) and across timepoints (CFI = 0.990, TLI = 0.979, RMSE = 0.037, SRMR = 0.034). The CABI extract achieved scalar invariance across two countries (CFI = 0.968, TLI = 0.963, RMSEA = 0.068, SRMR = 0.085) and across timepoints (CFI = 0.983, TLI = 0.980, RMSEA = 0.044, SRMR = 0.067).</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>Small sample sizes, disproportionate female sample, and use of subscales or item extracts may limit generalizability. The scales were also not validated for all age groups used.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The study provides evidence of validity for the internal structure of the DASS and CABI extracts across cultures and over time. These findings support the use of these open-access tools in resource-limited settings to promote local research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":"387 ","pages":"Article 119524"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032725009668","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS) and the Child and Adolescent Behaviour Inventory (CABI) are freely accessible tools used to assess depression and externalizing symptoms, respectively. There is limited psychometric evidence on how these scales hold over time and across cultures. This study aims to evaluate the internal structure of both scales and their invariance across six countries and over two timepoints.

Methods

Data from the ParentChat Pilot Study included information from 566 adults (85.51 % female) with children aged 2 to 17. Only female data from North Macedonia, Malaysia, Moldova, Montenegro, Philippines, and South Africa were used. Confirmatory factor analysis was employed to assess invariance of each construct.

Results

At baseline, the DASS depression subscale achieved scalar invariance across five countries (CFI = 0.973, TLI = 0.956, RMSEA = 0.060, SRMR = 0.069) and across timepoints (CFI = 0.990, TLI = 0.979, RMSE = 0.037, SRMR = 0.034). The CABI extract achieved scalar invariance across two countries (CFI = 0.968, TLI = 0.963, RMSEA = 0.068, SRMR = 0.085) and across timepoints (CFI = 0.983, TLI = 0.980, RMSEA = 0.044, SRMR = 0.067).

Limitations

Small sample sizes, disproportionate female sample, and use of subscales or item extracts may limit generalizability. The scales were also not validated for all age groups used.

Conclusions

The study provides evidence of validity for the internal structure of the DASS and CABI extracts across cultures and over time. These findings support the use of these open-access tools in resource-limited settings to promote local research.
跨文化和时间的六个国家妇女对抑郁焦虑压力量表(DASS)和儿童与青少年行为量表(CABI)的反应的心理测量比较。
背景:抑郁焦虑压力量表(DASS)和儿童与青少年行为量表(CABI)是分别用于评估抑郁和外化症状的免费工具。关于这些量表如何随时间和文化变化而变化的心理测量证据有限。本研究旨在评估这两个量表的内部结构及其在六个国家和两个时间点上的不变性。方法:来自ParentChat试点研究的数据包括来自566名2至17岁儿童的成年人(85.51% %为女性)的信息。仅使用了来自北马其顿、马来西亚、摩尔多瓦、黑山、菲律宾和南非的女性数据。采用验证性因子分析评估各构念的不变性。结果:在基线,DASS抑郁内部氧化物实现标量不变性在五个国家(CFI = 0.973  TLI = 0.956,RMSEA = 0.060 SRMR = 0.069)和跨时间点(CFI = 0.990  TLI = 0.979,RMSE = 0.037 SRMR = 0.034)。CABI提取实现标量不变性在两个国家(CFI = 0.968  TLI = 0.963 RMSEA = 0.068 SRMR = 0.085)和跨时间点(CFI = 0.983  TLI = 0.980 RMSEA = 0.044 SRMR = 0.067)。局限性:小样本量,不成比例的女性样本,使用子量表或项目摘录可能会限制推广。这些量表也没有对所有使用的年龄组进行验证。结论:该研究为DASS和CABI提取物的内部结构在不同培养和时间的有效性提供了证据。这些发现支持在资源有限的环境中使用这些开放获取工具来促进当地研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信