Clavien-Dindo classification for assessment of complications after 1465 unselected otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgeries in a university hospital: a retrospective observational study.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Leonie Glombitza, Jonas Ballmaier, Mussab Kouka, Thomas Bitter, Orlando Guntinas-Lichius
{"title":"Clavien-Dindo classification for assessment of complications after 1465 unselected otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgeries in a university hospital: a retrospective observational study.","authors":"Leonie Glombitza, Jonas Ballmaier, Mussab Kouka, Thomas Bitter, Orlando Guntinas-Lichius","doi":"10.1186/s12893-025-02970-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessment of surgical complications is an important part of quality control on departments of otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgery. Nevertheless, standardized assessment of surgical complications with easy-to-use instruments is not yet clinical routine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from all 1,465 otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgeries (male 60.3%; median age: 52 years) performed in 2020 at a department of otorhinolaryngology of a tertiary university hospital were analyzed. The postoperative complications were graded with the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most frequent types of surgery were: diagnostic endoscopy (19.4%), ear surgery (14.8%) and oral/pharyngeal surgery (12.1%). Two-hundred seven patients (14.1%) had CDC complications, mostly CDC grade II (6.9%) and CDC grade III (5.1%). Due to multivariate analysis, smoking was an important predictor of postoperative CDC complication (Odds ratio [OR] = 1.526; confidence interval [CI] = 1.037 to 2.244). The risk of re-admission was higher for patients with postoperative complications (OR = 2.859; CI = 2.119 to 3.8591). Compared to a diagnostic endoscopy, the incidence of postoperative complications was highest for esophageal surgery (highest risk: OR = 23.580; CI = 7.619 to 72.978), thyroid surgery (second highest risk: OR = 21.060; CI = 4.838 to 91.665), and salivary gland surgery (OR = 15.330; CI = 5.215 to 45.070).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CDC grading is a useful tool for grading all kind of otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgery complications. CDC is well suited for comparing different types of otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgeries with each other and also patients of different hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"235"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12121247/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-02970-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Assessment of surgical complications is an important part of quality control on departments of otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgery. Nevertheless, standardized assessment of surgical complications with easy-to-use instruments is not yet clinical routine.

Methods: Data from all 1,465 otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgeries (male 60.3%; median age: 52 years) performed in 2020 at a department of otorhinolaryngology of a tertiary university hospital were analyzed. The postoperative complications were graded with the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC).

Results: The most frequent types of surgery were: diagnostic endoscopy (19.4%), ear surgery (14.8%) and oral/pharyngeal surgery (12.1%). Two-hundred seven patients (14.1%) had CDC complications, mostly CDC grade II (6.9%) and CDC grade III (5.1%). Due to multivariate analysis, smoking was an important predictor of postoperative CDC complication (Odds ratio [OR] = 1.526; confidence interval [CI] = 1.037 to 2.244). The risk of re-admission was higher for patients with postoperative complications (OR = 2.859; CI = 2.119 to 3.8591). Compared to a diagnostic endoscopy, the incidence of postoperative complications was highest for esophageal surgery (highest risk: OR = 23.580; CI = 7.619 to 72.978), thyroid surgery (second highest risk: OR = 21.060; CI = 4.838 to 91.665), and salivary gland surgery (OR = 15.330; CI = 5.215 to 45.070).

Conclusions: The CDC grading is a useful tool for grading all kind of otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgery complications. CDC is well suited for comparing different types of otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgeries with each other and also patients of different hospitals.

某大学医院1465例未经选择的耳鼻喉头颈部手术术后并发症的Clavien-Dindo分类评估:一项回顾性观察研究
背景:手术并发症评估是耳鼻咽喉头颈外科质量控制的重要组成部分。然而,使用易于使用的器械对手术并发症进行标准化评估尚未成为临床常规。方法:1465例耳鼻喉科和头颈部手术的数据(男性60.3%;分析了某三级大学附属医院耳鼻咽喉科于2020年进行的手术。术后并发症采用Clavien-Dindo分级(CDC)进行分级。结果:最常见的手术类型为诊断性内窥镜(19.4%)、耳部手术(14.8%)和口腔/咽部手术(12.1%)。277例(14.1%)患者出现CDC并发症,主要为CDC II级(6.9%)和CDC III级(5.1%)。多因素分析显示,吸烟是术后CDC并发症的重要预测因素(优势比[OR] = 1.526;置信区间[CI] = 1.037 ~ 2.244)。术后并发症患者再入院风险较高(OR = 2.859;CI = 2.119 ~ 3.8591)。与诊断性内镜相比,食管手术术后并发症的发生率最高(最高风险:OR = 23.580;CI = 7.619 ~ 72.978),甲状腺手术(第二高风险:OR = 21.060;CI = 4.838 ~ 91.665),唾液腺手术(OR = 15.330;CI = 5.215 ~ 45.070)。结论:CDC分级是对各类耳鼻喉科及头颈外科并发症进行分级的有效工具。CDC非常适合不同类型的耳鼻喉科和头颈外科相互比较,也适合不同医院的患者比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信