Changing patterns in marriage choice and related health risk in the Pakistani heritage community in Bradford UK: a qualitative study.

Q1 Medicine
Wellcome Open Research Pub Date : 2025-06-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23338.3
Neil Small, Rifat Razaq, Vishal Sharma, Alice Cunningham, Zuneera Khurshid, Shahid Islam
{"title":"Changing patterns in marriage choice and related health risk in the Pakistani heritage community in Bradford UK: a qualitative study.","authors":"Neil Small, Rifat Razaq, Vishal Sharma, Alice Cunningham, Zuneera Khurshid, Shahid Islam","doi":"10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23338.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children born to blood relations (consanguineous parents), primarily cousins, have higher mortality and morbidity than children born to non-consanguineous parents. Consanguinity is low in the UK but high in some communities, including the Pakistani heritage community in Bradford. There has been a marked decrease in consanguinity in the last decade and that is likely to result in reductions in excess mortality and morbidity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Drawing on patterns of child health reported by the Born in Bradford study, augmented with a summary of the literature on motivations for choosing consanguineous unions and on the shifting characteristics of those who make this choice, questions about marriage choice and knowledge of allied health risk were devised. They were explored in four focus groups with self-identified members of the Pakistani heritage community. Groups were divided by age and gender. Discussions were analysed using Thematic Analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was agreement that rates of consanguinity were declining. Older group members were concerned this might indicate a shift from tradition and damage community cohesion. Younger participants were positive about the benefits of individual choice. They felt this could be achieved without damaging community strengths. Reasons for the fall in numbers were attributed to changes within the community, including higher numbers of people staying in education beyond school. External factors, including new immigration rules, were also considered.There was not a consensus about health risks, some older respondents were sceptical of links between marriage choice and child health and concerned about how health risks were communicated. All were concerned that marriage choice should not be used to demonise this community.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A commitment to sustaining community cohesion is shared by all groups. Younger people think this can be achieved despite falls in consanguinity. There are continuing challenges in communicating health risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":23677,"journal":{"name":"Wellcome Open Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"690"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12120418/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wellcome Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23338.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Children born to blood relations (consanguineous parents), primarily cousins, have higher mortality and morbidity than children born to non-consanguineous parents. Consanguinity is low in the UK but high in some communities, including the Pakistani heritage community in Bradford. There has been a marked decrease in consanguinity in the last decade and that is likely to result in reductions in excess mortality and morbidity.

Methods: Drawing on patterns of child health reported by the Born in Bradford study, augmented with a summary of the literature on motivations for choosing consanguineous unions and on the shifting characteristics of those who make this choice, questions about marriage choice and knowledge of allied health risk were devised. They were explored in four focus groups with self-identified members of the Pakistani heritage community. Groups were divided by age and gender. Discussions were analysed using Thematic Analysis.

Results: There was agreement that rates of consanguinity were declining. Older group members were concerned this might indicate a shift from tradition and damage community cohesion. Younger participants were positive about the benefits of individual choice. They felt this could be achieved without damaging community strengths. Reasons for the fall in numbers were attributed to changes within the community, including higher numbers of people staying in education beyond school. External factors, including new immigration rules, were also considered.There was not a consensus about health risks, some older respondents were sceptical of links between marriage choice and child health and concerned about how health risks were communicated. All were concerned that marriage choice should not be used to demonise this community.

Conclusion: A commitment to sustaining community cohesion is shared by all groups. Younger people think this can be achieved despite falls in consanguinity. There are continuing challenges in communicating health risk.

英国布拉德福德巴基斯坦传统社区婚姻选择模式的变化和相关的健康风险:一项定性研究。
背景:血亲(近亲父母)所生的孩子,主要是表兄妹,比非近亲父母所生的孩子有更高的死亡率和发病率。在英国,血缘关系很低,但在一些社区,包括布拉德福德的巴基斯坦传统社区,血缘关系很高。在过去十年中,血缘关系显著减少,这可能导致过高的死亡率和发病率降低。方法:根据出生在布拉德福德研究报告的儿童健康模式,结合选择近亲结合的动机和做出这种选择的人的变化特征的文献总结,设计了有关婚姻选择和相关健康风险知识的问题。他们在四个焦点小组中与自认为是巴基斯坦传统社区的成员进行了探讨。小组按年龄和性别划分。采用主题分析法对讨论进行分析。结果:血亲率呈下降趋势。年长的群体成员担心,这可能表明他们偏离了传统,破坏了社区凝聚力。年轻的参与者对转向个人选择的好处持积极态度。他们认为这可以在不损害社区力量的情况下实现。人数下降的原因归因于社区内部的变化,包括更多的人在毕业后继续接受教育。还考虑了外部因素,包括新的移民规则。对健康风险没有达成共识,一些年长的答复者对婚姻选择与儿童健康之间的联系持怀疑态度,并对如何传达健康风险表示关切。所有人都担心婚姻选择不应该被用来妖魔化这个群体。结论:所有群体都有维持社区凝聚力的承诺。年轻人认为,尽管血缘关系下降,但这是可以实现的。在传播健康风险方面仍然存在挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wellcome Open Research
Wellcome Open Research Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: Wellcome Open Research publishes scholarly articles reporting any basic scientific, translational and clinical research that has been funded (or co-funded) by Wellcome. Each publication must have at least one author who has been, or still is, a recipient of a Wellcome grant. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others, is welcome and will be published irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies are all suitable. See the full list of article types here. All articles are published using a fully transparent, author-driven model: the authors are solely responsible for the content of their article. Invited peer review takes place openly after publication, and the authors play a crucial role in ensuring that the article is peer-reviewed by independent experts in a timely manner. Articles that pass peer review will be indexed in PubMed and elsewhere. Wellcome Open Research is an Open Research platform: all articles are published open access; the publishing and peer-review processes are fully transparent; and authors are asked to include detailed descriptions of methods and to provide full and easy access to source data underlying the results to improve reproducibility.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信