Maria Alva, Sarahfaye Dolman, Slaven Sikirica, Paul Kolm, Katherine Andrade, Zugui Zhang, William S Weintraub
{"title":"Quality of life post heart failure diagnosis: population-level trends in the U.S.","authors":"Maria Alva, Sarahfaye Dolman, Slaven Sikirica, Paul Kolm, Katherine Andrade, Zugui Zhang, William S Weintraub","doi":"10.1186/s12955-025-02372-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with heart failure (HF) experience various symptoms making both diagnosis and disease burden estimates challenging. While HF-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are widely used, their focus on clinical cohorts limits their generalizability. Preference-based measures like the EQ-5D enable standardized health-related quality of life (HRQoL) comparisons across conditions, supporting resource allocation decisions. The CDC's Healthy Days (HD) Survey-a simple two-question tool that can be mapped to the EQ-5D-offers a broader approach to tracking HRQoL but remains underutilized in HF populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a nationally representative U.S. sample, we mapped HD Survey responses to EQ-5D utility scores to compare HRQoL between individuals with and without HF and examined changes in HRQoL over time. We assessed whether HD-derived scores align with HF-specific utility measures to support population-level health monitoring.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals with HF report significantly more physically unhealthy days (8.46 vs. 3.42) and mentally unhealthy days (5.42 vs. 3.86) compared to those without HF. HF respondents are, on average, 20 years older than those without HF, consistent with HF's prevalence in older adults. The likelihood of an HF diagnosis is similar for men and women but higher among non-Hispanic whites and blacks than Hispanics and other races. Those with HF are more likely to have health insurance. Adjusting for age, sex, race, and insurance, mean EQ-5D utility scores for individuals with and without HF are 0.785 (95% CI: 0.714-0.825) and 0.840 (95% CI: 0.827-0.851), respectively. Utility scores for HF patients remain significantly lower than those without HF up to 10 years post-diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HF reduces HRQoL by 6.55%, surpassing the clinically significant threshold of a 1-2% decrement. These findings highlight the potential of the HD Survey to inform public health monitoring and underscore the need for tailored interventions to address HRQoL deficits in HF populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12980,"journal":{"name":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","volume":"23 1","pages":"53"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12123777/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-025-02372-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Individuals with heart failure (HF) experience various symptoms making both diagnosis and disease burden estimates challenging. While HF-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are widely used, their focus on clinical cohorts limits their generalizability. Preference-based measures like the EQ-5D enable standardized health-related quality of life (HRQoL) comparisons across conditions, supporting resource allocation decisions. The CDC's Healthy Days (HD) Survey-a simple two-question tool that can be mapped to the EQ-5D-offers a broader approach to tracking HRQoL but remains underutilized in HF populations.
Methods: Using a nationally representative U.S. sample, we mapped HD Survey responses to EQ-5D utility scores to compare HRQoL between individuals with and without HF and examined changes in HRQoL over time. We assessed whether HD-derived scores align with HF-specific utility measures to support population-level health monitoring.
Results: Individuals with HF report significantly more physically unhealthy days (8.46 vs. 3.42) and mentally unhealthy days (5.42 vs. 3.86) compared to those without HF. HF respondents are, on average, 20 years older than those without HF, consistent with HF's prevalence in older adults. The likelihood of an HF diagnosis is similar for men and women but higher among non-Hispanic whites and blacks than Hispanics and other races. Those with HF are more likely to have health insurance. Adjusting for age, sex, race, and insurance, mean EQ-5D utility scores for individuals with and without HF are 0.785 (95% CI: 0.714-0.825) and 0.840 (95% CI: 0.827-0.851), respectively. Utility scores for HF patients remain significantly lower than those without HF up to 10 years post-diagnosis.
Conclusion: HF reduces HRQoL by 6.55%, surpassing the clinically significant threshold of a 1-2% decrement. These findings highlight the potential of the HD Survey to inform public health monitoring and underscore the need for tailored interventions to address HRQoL deficits in HF populations.
期刊介绍:
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal offering high quality articles, rapid publication and wide diffusion in the public domain.
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes considers original manuscripts on the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) assessment for evaluation of medical and psychosocial interventions. It also considers approaches and studies on psychometric properties of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures, including cultural validation of instruments if they provide information about the impact of interventions. The journal publishes study protocols and reviews summarising the present state of knowledge concerning a particular aspect of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures. Reviews should generally follow systematic review methodology. Comments on articles and letters to the editor are welcome.