A network analysis of timing and conditions present at time of death for periviable infants (22+0-23+6 weeks) admitted to neonatal intensive care after receiving survival-focused care at birth.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Frontiers in Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-05-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fped.2025.1552352
J Peterson, D M Smith, E D Johnstone, K Harvey, A Mahaveer
{"title":"A network analysis of timing and conditions present at time of death for periviable infants (22+0-23+6 weeks) admitted to neonatal intensive care after receiving survival-focused care at birth.","authors":"J Peterson, D M Smith, E D Johnstone, K Harvey, A Mahaveer","doi":"10.3389/fped.2025.1552352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Advances in neonatal care have resulted in improved survival rates for periviable infants (22 + 0-23 + 6 weeks) with increasing numbers being admitted to neonatal intensive care units across the United Kingdom. Qualitative research evidences the conflict perinatal professionals experience traversing the line between providing life-sustaining treatment to these infants, whilst not wanting to inflict a prolonged period of suffering to infants who will ultimately die. Professionals currently lack adequate prognostic tools to accurately predict pre-birth which infants will survive.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilises an anonymised dataset from the North West Neonatal Network to delineate time of death profiles for periviable infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units (NICU) and explores the demographics, timing and diagnoses recorded at the time of the death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data show that most periviable infants who died following admission to NICU died within the first seven days after birth [24 infants born at 22 weeks (65%) and 55 infants born at 23 weeks (52%)]. For infants born at 22 weeks who subsequently died on NICU, 89% had died within 14 days after birth. Reorientation of care was recorded as a relevant factor at the time of death in a minority of patients [23 infants (16%)].</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Where active, survival-focused care has been initiated, the response of the infant to intensive care and the likelihood of their survival emerges over a relatively short timeframe after admission. This lends support to a trial of therapy approach for suitable periviable infants balancing the need to avoid iatrogenic harm to infants who will ultimately die despite intensive care, whilst not denying them the chance at survival. Management of periviable deliveries requires coordinated parallel planning and a high-quality palliative care approach throughout.</p>","PeriodicalId":12637,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","volume":"13 ","pages":"1552352"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12120172/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2025.1552352","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Advances in neonatal care have resulted in improved survival rates for periviable infants (22 + 0-23 + 6 weeks) with increasing numbers being admitted to neonatal intensive care units across the United Kingdom. Qualitative research evidences the conflict perinatal professionals experience traversing the line between providing life-sustaining treatment to these infants, whilst not wanting to inflict a prolonged period of suffering to infants who will ultimately die. Professionals currently lack adequate prognostic tools to accurately predict pre-birth which infants will survive.

Methods: This study utilises an anonymised dataset from the North West Neonatal Network to delineate time of death profiles for periviable infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units (NICU) and explores the demographics, timing and diagnoses recorded at the time of the death.

Results: The data show that most periviable infants who died following admission to NICU died within the first seven days after birth [24 infants born at 22 weeks (65%) and 55 infants born at 23 weeks (52%)]. For infants born at 22 weeks who subsequently died on NICU, 89% had died within 14 days after birth. Reorientation of care was recorded as a relevant factor at the time of death in a minority of patients [23 infants (16%)].

Discussion: Where active, survival-focused care has been initiated, the response of the infant to intensive care and the likelihood of their survival emerges over a relatively short timeframe after admission. This lends support to a trial of therapy approach for suitable periviable infants balancing the need to avoid iatrogenic harm to infants who will ultimately die despite intensive care, whilst not denying them the chance at survival. Management of periviable deliveries requires coordinated parallel planning and a high-quality palliative care approach throughout.

对出生时接受以生存为重点的护理后入住新生儿重症监护室的可存活婴儿(22+0-23+6周)死亡时的时间和情况进行网络分析。
导读:新生儿护理的进步提高了围生期婴儿(22 + 0-23 + 6周)的存活率,全英国越来越多的新生儿被送入新生儿重症监护病房。定性研究证明,围产期专业人员在为这些婴儿提供维持生命的治疗,同时又不想给最终会死亡的婴儿造成长期痛苦之间存在冲突。专业人员目前缺乏足够的预后工具来准确预测出生前哪些婴儿会存活。方法:本研究利用来自西北新生儿网络的匿名数据集来描述新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)住院的围生儿的死亡时间概况,并探讨死亡时记录的人口统计学、时间和诊断。结果:新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)入院后死亡的围生儿多在出生后7天内死亡[22周出生24例(65%),23周出生55例(52%)]。在出生22周后死于新生儿重症监护病房的婴儿中,89%在出生后14天内死亡。在少数患者(23名婴儿(16%))死亡时,护理重新定向被记录为一个相关因素。讨论:在积极的、以生存为重点的护理已经开始的地方,婴儿对重症监护的反应和他们的生存可能性在入院后相对较短的时间内出现。这为适当的围生期婴儿的治疗方法试验提供了支持,该试验平衡了避免医源性伤害婴儿的需要,这些婴儿最终将在重症监护下死亡,同时不剥夺他们的生存机会。围生期分娩的管理需要协调并行规划,并始终采用高质量的姑息治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Pediatrics
Frontiers in Pediatrics Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
2132
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Pediatrics (Impact Factor 2.33) publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research broadly across the field, from basic to clinical research that meets ongoing challenges in pediatric patient care and child health. Field Chief Editors Arjan Te Pas at Leiden University and Michael L. Moritz at the Children''s Hospital of Pittsburgh are supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. Frontiers in Pediatrics also features Research Topics, Frontiers special theme-focused issues managed by Guest Associate Editors, addressing important areas in pediatrics. In this fashion, Frontiers serves as an outlet to publish the broadest aspects of pediatrics in both basic and clinical research, including high-quality reviews, case reports, editorials and commentaries related to all aspects of pediatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信