Validation of ocular trauma score (OTS) in open- and closed-globe injuries in Indian patients.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-30 DOI:10.4103/IJO.IJO_2737_24
Fatema J Noble, Sumeet T Lahane, Tatyarao P Lahane, Ragini H Parekh, Sayalee T Lahane, Priyanka P Dhaytadak, Ashish K Jain
{"title":"Validation of ocular trauma score (OTS) in open- and closed-globe injuries in Indian patients.","authors":"Fatema J Noble, Sumeet T Lahane, Tatyarao P Lahane, Ragini H Parekh, Sayalee T Lahane, Priyanka P Dhaytadak, Ashish K Jain","doi":"10.4103/IJO.IJO_2737_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To validate the predictive value of the ocular trauma score (OTS) in open- and closed-globe eye injuries in the Indian context.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective interventional case series.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study, conducted at a tertiary healthcare institute from January 2018 to June 2019, included 150 eyes of 150 patients with open- and closed-globe injuries. Inclusion criteria were patients with globe injuries who provided informed consent and had complete OTS data. Exclusion criteria included electric, chemical, and thermal injuries, prior surgery, pre-existing poor visual acuity (VA), and severe systemic injuries. There was no randomization. Demographic details, initial and final VA, injury type, and OTS variables were recorded. Patients were classified into OTS categories preoperatively based on Kuhn et al.'s system, and VA distribution was compared with the original study. The main outcome was to assess the correlation between the final BCVA at 6 months post-intervention and the predicted VA based on the OTS category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 150 patients (72% open globe, 28% closed globe) were included, with a male-to-female ratio of 4.5:1. The mean age ± SD was 29.34 ± 17.49 years. OTS classification showed 6% in OTS 1, 17% in OTS 2, 67% in OTS 3, 4% in OTS 4, and 6% in OTS 5. Final VA was ≤20/40 (41%), 20/50-20/200 (20%), 20/200-1/200 (15%), HM/PL (15%), and NLP (9%). Final VA post-treatment correlated with predicted VA as per the OTS category (Spearman's r = 0.53, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OTS provides reliable prognostic information and has fair predictive value for final VA in open- and closed-globe injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":13329,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"73 Suppl 3","pages":"S498-S501"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12178410/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_2737_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To validate the predictive value of the ocular trauma score (OTS) in open- and closed-globe eye injuries in the Indian context.

Design: Prospective interventional case series.

Methods: This study, conducted at a tertiary healthcare institute from January 2018 to June 2019, included 150 eyes of 150 patients with open- and closed-globe injuries. Inclusion criteria were patients with globe injuries who provided informed consent and had complete OTS data. Exclusion criteria included electric, chemical, and thermal injuries, prior surgery, pre-existing poor visual acuity (VA), and severe systemic injuries. There was no randomization. Demographic details, initial and final VA, injury type, and OTS variables were recorded. Patients were classified into OTS categories preoperatively based on Kuhn et al.'s system, and VA distribution was compared with the original study. The main outcome was to assess the correlation between the final BCVA at 6 months post-intervention and the predicted VA based on the OTS category.

Results: A total of 150 patients (72% open globe, 28% closed globe) were included, with a male-to-female ratio of 4.5:1. The mean age ± SD was 29.34 ± 17.49 years. OTS classification showed 6% in OTS 1, 17% in OTS 2, 67% in OTS 3, 4% in OTS 4, and 6% in OTS 5. Final VA was ≤20/40 (41%), 20/50-20/200 (20%), 20/200-1/200 (15%), HM/PL (15%), and NLP (9%). Final VA post-treatment correlated with predicted VA as per the OTS category (Spearman's r = 0.53, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: OTS provides reliable prognostic information and has fair predictive value for final VA in open- and closed-globe injuries.

眼外伤评分(OTS)在印度患者开闭眼损伤中的验证。
目的:验证眼外伤评分(OTS)在印度睁眼和闭眼损伤中的预测价值。设计:前瞻性介入病例系列。方法:本研究于2018年1月至2019年6月在一家三级医疗机构进行,包括150例开闭眼损伤患者的150只眼睛。纳入标准是提供知情同意并具有完整OTS数据的球形损伤患者。排除标准包括电、化学和热损伤、既往手术、既往视力差(VA)和严重的全身损伤。没有随机化。记录了人口统计细节、初始和最终VA、损伤类型和OTS变量。术前根据Kuhn等人的系统对患者进行OTS分类,并将VA分布与原始研究进行比较。主要结果是评估干预后6个月的最终BCVA与基于OTS分类的预测VA之间的相关性。结果:共纳入150例患者,其中开放球72%,封闭球28%,男女比例为4.5:1。平均年龄±SD为29.34±17.49岁。OTS分类中,OTS 1占6%,OTS 2占17%,OTS 3占67%,OTS 4占4%,OTS 5占6%。最后VA≤20/40(41%)、20/50-20/200(20%)、20/200-1/200(15%)、HM / PL(15%)和NLP(9%)。根据OTS分类,治疗后最终VA与预测VA相关(Spearman’s r = 0.53, P < 0.001)。结论:OTS提供了可靠的预后信息,对开放性和闭合性椎体损伤的最终VA具有一定的预测价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
19.40%
发文量
1963
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Ophthalmology covers clinical, experimental, basic science research and translational research studies related to medical, ethical and social issues in field of ophthalmology and vision science. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信