Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 bacteriophage potential in human gut microbiota.

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
F1000Research Pub Date : 2025-04-23 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.12688/f1000research.109236.2
Mauro Petrillo, Maddalena Querci, Carlo Brogna, Jessica Ponti, Simone Cristoni, Peter V Markov, Andrea Valsesia, Gabriele Leoni, Alessandro Benedetti, Thierry Wiss, Guy Van den Eede
{"title":"Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 bacteriophage potential in human gut microbiota.","authors":"Mauro Petrillo, Maddalena Querci, Carlo Brogna, Jessica Ponti, Simone Cristoni, Peter V Markov, Andrea Valsesia, Gabriele Leoni, Alessandro Benedetti, Thierry Wiss, Guy Van den Eede","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.109236.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In previous studies we have shown that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) replicates <i>in vitro</i> in bacterial growth medium, that the viral replication follows bacterial growth, and it is influenced by the administration of specific antibiotics. These observations are compatible with a 'bacteriophage-like' behaviour of SARS-CoV-2.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We have further elaborated on these unusual findings and here we present the results of three different supplementary experiments: (1) an electron-microscope analysis of samples of bacteria obtained from a faecal sample of a subject positive to SARS-CoV-2; (2) mass spectrometric analysis of these cultures to assess the eventual de novo synthesis of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein; (3) sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 collected from plaques obtained from two different gut microbial bacteria inoculated with supernatant from faecal microbiota of an individual positive to SARS-CoV-2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Immuno-labelling with Anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein antibody confirmed presence of SARS-CoV-2 both outside and inside bacteria. <i>De novo</i> synthesis of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein was observed, as evidence that SARS-CoV-2 RNA is translated in the bacterial cultures. In addition, phage-like plaques were spotted on faecal bacteria cultures after inoculation with supernatant from faecal microbiota of an individual positive to SARS-CoV-2. Bioinformatic analyses on the reads obtained by sequencing RNA extracted from the plaques revealed nucleic acid polymorphisms, suggesting different replication environment in the two bacterial cultures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on these results we conclude that, in addition to its well-documented interactions with eukaryotic cells, SARS-CoV-2 may act as a bacteriophage when interacting with at least two bacterial species known to be present in the human microbiota. If the hypothesis proposed, i.e., that under certain conditions SARS-CoV-2 may multiply at the expense of human gut bacteria, is further substantiated, it would drastically change the model of acting and infecting of SARS-CoV-2, and most likely that of other human pathogenic viruses.</p>","PeriodicalId":12260,"journal":{"name":"F1000Research","volume":"11 ","pages":"292"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12120431/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F1000Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.109236.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In previous studies we have shown that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) replicates in vitro in bacterial growth medium, that the viral replication follows bacterial growth, and it is influenced by the administration of specific antibiotics. These observations are compatible with a 'bacteriophage-like' behaviour of SARS-CoV-2.

Methods: We have further elaborated on these unusual findings and here we present the results of three different supplementary experiments: (1) an electron-microscope analysis of samples of bacteria obtained from a faecal sample of a subject positive to SARS-CoV-2; (2) mass spectrometric analysis of these cultures to assess the eventual de novo synthesis of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein; (3) sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 collected from plaques obtained from two different gut microbial bacteria inoculated with supernatant from faecal microbiota of an individual positive to SARS-CoV-2.

Results: Immuno-labelling with Anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein antibody confirmed presence of SARS-CoV-2 both outside and inside bacteria. De novo synthesis of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein was observed, as evidence that SARS-CoV-2 RNA is translated in the bacterial cultures. In addition, phage-like plaques were spotted on faecal bacteria cultures after inoculation with supernatant from faecal microbiota of an individual positive to SARS-CoV-2. Bioinformatic analyses on the reads obtained by sequencing RNA extracted from the plaques revealed nucleic acid polymorphisms, suggesting different replication environment in the two bacterial cultures.

Conclusions: Based on these results we conclude that, in addition to its well-documented interactions with eukaryotic cells, SARS-CoV-2 may act as a bacteriophage when interacting with at least two bacterial species known to be present in the human microbiota. If the hypothesis proposed, i.e., that under certain conditions SARS-CoV-2 may multiply at the expense of human gut bacteria, is further substantiated, it would drastically change the model of acting and infecting of SARS-CoV-2, and most likely that of other human pathogenic viruses.

人类肠道微生物群中SARS-CoV-2噬菌体潜力的证据
背景:在之前的研究中,我们已经发现严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)在细菌生长培养基中体外复制,病毒复制跟随细菌生长,并且受特定抗生素的使用影响。这些观察结果与SARS-CoV-2的“噬菌体样”行为相一致。方法:我们进一步阐述了这些不寻常的发现,在这里我们介绍了三个不同的补充实验的结果:(1)对从SARS-CoV-2阳性受试者的粪便样本中获得的细菌样本进行电子显微镜分析;(2)对这些培养物进行质谱分析,以评估SARS-CoV-2刺突蛋白的最终重新合成;(3) SARS-CoV-2阳性个体粪便微生物群上清接种两种不同肠道微生物菌获得的斑块收集的SARS-CoV-2测序。结果:抗SARS-CoV-2核衣壳蛋白抗体免疫标记证实细菌内外均存在SARS-CoV-2。观察到SARS-CoV-2刺突蛋白的从头合成,作为SARS-CoV-2 RNA在细菌培养物中翻译的证据。此外,用SARS-CoV-2阳性个体的粪便微生物群上清液接种后,在粪便细菌培养物上发现了噬菌体样斑块。对从斑块中提取的RNA测序获得的reads进行生物信息学分析显示核酸多态性,表明两种细菌培养中存在不同的复制环境。结论:基于这些结果,我们得出结论,除了与真核细胞有充分记录的相互作用外,SARS-CoV-2在与至少两种已知存在于人类微生物群中的细菌相互作用时可能作为噬菌体。如果提出的假设(即在某些条件下SARS-CoV-2可能以牺牲人类肠道细菌为代价繁殖)得到进一步证实,它将彻底改变SARS-CoV-2的作用和感染模式,很可能也会改变其他人类致病病毒的作用和感染模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
F1000Research
F1000Research Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1646
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: F1000Research publishes articles and other research outputs reporting basic scientific, scholarly, translational and clinical research across the physical and life sciences, engineering, medicine, social sciences and humanities. F1000Research is a scholarly publication platform set up for the scientific, scholarly and medical research community; each article has at least one author who is a qualified researcher, scholar or clinician actively working in their speciality and who has made a key contribution to the article. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research is suitable irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; we welcome confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies. F1000Research publishes different type of research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others. Reviews and Opinion articles providing a balanced and comprehensive overview of the latest discoveries in a particular field, or presenting a personal perspective on recent developments, are also welcome. See the full list of article types we accept for more information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信