{"title":"Evolutionarily Distinct Species and Their Partners Have Fewer Links in Ecological Networks","authors":"Avery M. Kruger, T. Jonathan Davies","doi":"10.1111/geb.70066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Ecological networks describe the complex set of interconnections among species and their environment, and network structure can inform the stability, resilience, and functioning of ecosystems. Increasing attention is being paid to the mechanisms that determine species interactions. Phylogeny has informed our understanding of connections within networks, mostly by describing the strength of phylogenetic conservation of interactions. Here, we examine how the phylogenetic position of a species relates to its functional position within a network, testing the relationship between phylogenetic and network topologies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Global.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time Period</h3>\n \n <p>Early 20th century to present.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\n \n <p>Birds and plants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We used a large dataset of frugivore interactions to calculate the network degree of focal species (degree) and the partners they interact with (partner degree) and bird and plant phylogenies to calculate local evolutionary distinctiveness (ED), a measure of evolutionary distinctiveness calculated on a community-level phylogeny. We then fit binomial Bayesian models to estimate the effect of species' local ED on their degree and that of their partners. In avian networks, we incorporated bird traits from AVONET in models to determine their contributions to degree and partner degree relative to those of local ED.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The partners of both high local ED birds and plants tend to have fewer interactions in a network than do partners of low local ED species, and birds with high local ED tend to interact with fewer plant species. In birds, the statistical effect sizes of local ED on degree and partner degree are comparable to or larger than those of measured traits.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our analysis illustrates how phylogenetic relationships affect present-day ecologies and underscores the unique ecological contribution of evolutionary outliers.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"34 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.70066","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70066","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim
Ecological networks describe the complex set of interconnections among species and their environment, and network structure can inform the stability, resilience, and functioning of ecosystems. Increasing attention is being paid to the mechanisms that determine species interactions. Phylogeny has informed our understanding of connections within networks, mostly by describing the strength of phylogenetic conservation of interactions. Here, we examine how the phylogenetic position of a species relates to its functional position within a network, testing the relationship between phylogenetic and network topologies.
Location
Global.
Time Period
Early 20th century to present.
Major Taxa Studied
Birds and plants.
Methods
We used a large dataset of frugivore interactions to calculate the network degree of focal species (degree) and the partners they interact with (partner degree) and bird and plant phylogenies to calculate local evolutionary distinctiveness (ED), a measure of evolutionary distinctiveness calculated on a community-level phylogeny. We then fit binomial Bayesian models to estimate the effect of species' local ED on their degree and that of their partners. In avian networks, we incorporated bird traits from AVONET in models to determine their contributions to degree and partner degree relative to those of local ED.
Results
The partners of both high local ED birds and plants tend to have fewer interactions in a network than do partners of low local ED species, and birds with high local ED tend to interact with fewer plant species. In birds, the statistical effect sizes of local ED on degree and partner degree are comparable to or larger than those of measured traits.
Main Conclusions
Our analysis illustrates how phylogenetic relationships affect present-day ecologies and underscores the unique ecological contribution of evolutionary outliers.
期刊介绍:
Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.