Multi-objective optimization of capacity configuration for district heating and cooling system based on life cycle cost and annual carbon dioxide emissions
IF 6.7 2区 工程技术Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Yucheng Ren , Zhili Ren , Gang Zou , Pengcheng Zhang , Xueqi Xu , Yimin Xiao
{"title":"Multi-objective optimization of capacity configuration for district heating and cooling system based on life cycle cost and annual carbon dioxide emissions","authors":"Yucheng Ren , Zhili Ren , Gang Zou , Pengcheng Zhang , Xueqi Xu , Yimin Xiao","doi":"10.1016/j.jobe.2025.113038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>District heating and cooling (DHC) systems with energy storage are highly promising due to their high economic viability and energy-saving potential. However, inadequate consideration of time-of-use (TOU) pricing, annual load demand variations and control strategies often leads to excessive capacities and low energy efficiency. A multi-objective optimization (MOO) model is established by combining the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) and Technique Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method, aiming to minimize life cycle cost (LCC) and annual CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. Taking an office park in Beijing as an example, a comprehensive optimal capacity configuration is obtained from both economic benefits and energy efficiency perspectives. Results indicate that the optimal capacities for solar collectors, gas boiler, electric heating boiler, electric chiller, heat energy storage tank, and cold energy storage tank are 2564 m<sup>2</sup>, 1260 kW, 1350 kW, 1400 kW, 344,386 kW, and 7234 kW, respectively. Compared to configurations individually considering LCC and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, the optimal scheme reduces CO<sub>2</sub> emissions by 10.75 % and LCC by 1.12 %. Compared to the traditional DHC system without energy storage, the initial investment for the DHC system with energy storage increases by 29.48 %, but the LCC decreases by 52.33 %, annual electricity expenses fall by 57.53 %, and annual CO<sub>2</sub> emissions drop by 49.63 %. This study provides valuable insights for designing the DHC system with energy storage that achieve both high economic efficiency and low CO<sub>2</sub> emissions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of building engineering","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 113038"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of building engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352710225012756","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
District heating and cooling (DHC) systems with energy storage are highly promising due to their high economic viability and energy-saving potential. However, inadequate consideration of time-of-use (TOU) pricing, annual load demand variations and control strategies often leads to excessive capacities and low energy efficiency. A multi-objective optimization (MOO) model is established by combining the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) and Technique Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method, aiming to minimize life cycle cost (LCC) and annual CO2 emissions. Taking an office park in Beijing as an example, a comprehensive optimal capacity configuration is obtained from both economic benefits and energy efficiency perspectives. Results indicate that the optimal capacities for solar collectors, gas boiler, electric heating boiler, electric chiller, heat energy storage tank, and cold energy storage tank are 2564 m2, 1260 kW, 1350 kW, 1400 kW, 344,386 kW, and 7234 kW, respectively. Compared to configurations individually considering LCC and CO2 emissions, the optimal scheme reduces CO2 emissions by 10.75 % and LCC by 1.12 %. Compared to the traditional DHC system without energy storage, the initial investment for the DHC system with energy storage increases by 29.48 %, but the LCC decreases by 52.33 %, annual electricity expenses fall by 57.53 %, and annual CO2 emissions drop by 49.63 %. This study provides valuable insights for designing the DHC system with energy storage that achieve both high economic efficiency and low CO2 emissions.
区域供热和供冷(DHC)系统具有很高的经济可行性和节能潜力,是非常有前途的。然而,由于对分时电价、年负荷需求变化和控制策略考虑不足,往往导致发电能力过剩和能源效率低下。结合非支配排序遗传算法II (NSGA-II)和TOPSIS (technical Order Preference by Similarity to A Ideal Solution)方法,建立了以LCC和年CO2排放量最小为目标的多目标优化(MOO)模型。以北京某办公园区为例,从经济效益和能效两方面进行综合优化配置。结果表明,太阳能集热器、燃气锅炉、电热锅炉、电冷水机组、蓄热罐和蓄冷罐的最优容量分别为2564 m2、1260 kW、1350 kW、1400 kW、344386 kW和7234 kW。与单独考虑LCC和CO2排放的配置相比,最优方案的CO2排放量减少10.75%,LCC减少1.12%。与不带储能的传统DHC系统相比,带储能的DHC系统初始投资增加29.48%,但LCC降低52.33%,年电费支出下降57.53%,年CO2排放量下降49.63%。该研究为设计具有高经济性和低CO2排放的储能DHC系统提供了有价值的见解。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Building Engineering is an interdisciplinary journal that covers all aspects of science and technology concerned with the whole life cycle of the built environment; from the design phase through to construction, operation, performance, maintenance and its deterioration.