Exploring place-based loneliness interventions: a realist review

IF 2.2 Q2 GEOGRAPHY
Dorien Gryp , Leen Heylen , Jasper De Witte , Wouter Schepers , Freya Häussermann , Daan Duppen , Tine Van Regenmortel
{"title":"Exploring place-based loneliness interventions: a realist review","authors":"Dorien Gryp ,&nbsp;Leen Heylen ,&nbsp;Jasper De Witte ,&nbsp;Wouter Schepers ,&nbsp;Freya Häussermann ,&nbsp;Daan Duppen ,&nbsp;Tine Van Regenmortel","doi":"10.1016/j.wss.2025.100275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent research increasingly acknowledges the association between place-based features and loneliness. However, knowledge on loneliness interventions from a place-based perspective is still lacking. The aim of this review is to investigate how and why loneliness interventions from a place-based perspective can prevent and reduce loneliness. This review included 24 articles on place-based loneliness interventions.</div><div>First, a thematic analysis on the program activity types of place-based loneliness interventions resulted in nine program activity types. These results show that most of the interventions targeted social environment characteristics and lacked a focus on physical environment characteristics. Reducing loneliness was the main goal of the program activities, whereas prevention was uncommon. Second, a realist analysis of the mechanisms explaining how and why these interventions are thought or expected to prevent and reduce loneliness led to a framework of three types of mechanisms. Mediating mechanisms present the social environment characteristics, which were defined as intermediate goals of the program activities. Moderating mechanisms, enabling the association between program activities and outcomes, illuminate the roles and attitudes of stakeholders. The resources – time and space – enhance a change in the other mechanisms by influencing the program activities.</div><div>The results urge adoption of a broader range of strategies to respond to loneliness and contribute to a more holistic and structural response to loneliness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52616,"journal":{"name":"Wellbeing Space and Society","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100275"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wellbeing Space and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666558125000417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent research increasingly acknowledges the association between place-based features and loneliness. However, knowledge on loneliness interventions from a place-based perspective is still lacking. The aim of this review is to investigate how and why loneliness interventions from a place-based perspective can prevent and reduce loneliness. This review included 24 articles on place-based loneliness interventions.
First, a thematic analysis on the program activity types of place-based loneliness interventions resulted in nine program activity types. These results show that most of the interventions targeted social environment characteristics and lacked a focus on physical environment characteristics. Reducing loneliness was the main goal of the program activities, whereas prevention was uncommon. Second, a realist analysis of the mechanisms explaining how and why these interventions are thought or expected to prevent and reduce loneliness led to a framework of three types of mechanisms. Mediating mechanisms present the social environment characteristics, which were defined as intermediate goals of the program activities. Moderating mechanisms, enabling the association between program activities and outcomes, illuminate the roles and attitudes of stakeholders. The resources – time and space – enhance a change in the other mechanisms by influencing the program activities.
The results urge adoption of a broader range of strategies to respond to loneliness and contribute to a more holistic and structural response to loneliness.
探索基于地点的孤独干预:现实主义回顾
最近的研究越来越多地承认基于地点的特征和孤独感之间的联系。然而,从基于地点的角度对孤独干预的知识仍然缺乏。本综述的目的是研究基于地点的孤独干预如何以及为什么可以预防和减少孤独。本综述包括24篇关于基于地的孤独感干预的文章。首先,对基于地方的孤独感干预的项目活动类型进行专题分析,得出九种项目活动类型。这些结果表明,大多数干预措施针对的是社会环境特征,缺乏对物理环境特征的关注。减少孤独感是项目活动的主要目标,而预防并不常见。其次,对解释这些干预措施如何以及为什么被认为或期望预防和减少孤独感的机制进行现实主义分析,得出了三种类型机制的框架。中介机制呈现社会环境特征,这些特征被定义为项目活动的中间目标。调节机制,使项目活动和结果之间的联系,阐明了利益相关者的角色和态度。资源——时间和空间——通过影响项目活动来增强其他机制的变化。研究结果敦促采取更广泛的策略来应对孤独,并有助于对孤独做出更全面和结构性的回应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wellbeing Space and Society
Wellbeing Space and Society Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
124 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信