Network structure of social anxiety in patients with social anxiety disorder and university students: Examining the cognitive behavioral model and the role of mindfulness

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Shota Noda , Motohiro Nishiuchi , Giovanbattista Andreoli , Kentaro Shirotsuki , Stefan G. Hofmann
{"title":"Network structure of social anxiety in patients with social anxiety disorder and university students: Examining the cognitive behavioral model and the role of mindfulness","authors":"Shota Noda ,&nbsp;Motohiro Nishiuchi ,&nbsp;Giovanbattista Andreoli ,&nbsp;Kentaro Shirotsuki ,&nbsp;Stefan G. Hofmann","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2025.119498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Self-focused attention, cost/probability bias, and avoidance behavior are maintaining factors of social anxiety. The manipulation of dispositional mindfulness has been shown to reduce social anxiety and its maintaining factors. This study examined the associations among dispositional mindfulness, self-focused attention, cost/probability bias, avoidance behavior, and social anxiety to explore the mechanism of mindfulness and its relationship with social anxiety in patients with social anxiety disorder (SAD) and university students. Data from 412 patients with SAD and 367 students were analyzed using psychometric network analysis. Both groups completed self-report measures assessing dispositional mindfulness, self-focused attention, cost/probability bias, avoidance behavior, and social anxiety. A weak negative association was found between non-judging in dispositional mindfulness and self-focused attention to one's behavior in the SAD patients' network. In the students' network, a weak negative association was observed between non-judging and self-focused attention to one's behaviors, as well as between describing and social anxiety. In the SAD patients' network, nodes with the highest strength centrality were probability bias and social anxiety. In the students' network, nodes with the highest strength centrality were social anxiety and cost bias. The global network structure and connectivity differed between patients with SAD and students. The findings support the cognitive-behavioral model of SAD and highlight the heterogeneity of social anxiety, necessitating tailored intervention strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":"387 ","pages":"Article 119498"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032725009401","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Self-focused attention, cost/probability bias, and avoidance behavior are maintaining factors of social anxiety. The manipulation of dispositional mindfulness has been shown to reduce social anxiety and its maintaining factors. This study examined the associations among dispositional mindfulness, self-focused attention, cost/probability bias, avoidance behavior, and social anxiety to explore the mechanism of mindfulness and its relationship with social anxiety in patients with social anxiety disorder (SAD) and university students. Data from 412 patients with SAD and 367 students were analyzed using psychometric network analysis. Both groups completed self-report measures assessing dispositional mindfulness, self-focused attention, cost/probability bias, avoidance behavior, and social anxiety. A weak negative association was found between non-judging in dispositional mindfulness and self-focused attention to one's behavior in the SAD patients' network. In the students' network, a weak negative association was observed between non-judging and self-focused attention to one's behaviors, as well as between describing and social anxiety. In the SAD patients' network, nodes with the highest strength centrality were probability bias and social anxiety. In the students' network, nodes with the highest strength centrality were social anxiety and cost bias. The global network structure and connectivity differed between patients with SAD and students. The findings support the cognitive-behavioral model of SAD and highlight the heterogeneity of social anxiety, necessitating tailored intervention strategies.
社交焦虑障碍患者与大学生社交焦虑的网络结构:认知行为模型及正念作用的检验
自我关注、成本/概率偏差和回避行为是社交焦虑的维持因素。已证明,操纵性格正念可以减少社交焦虑及其维持因素。本研究旨在探讨社交焦虑障碍(social anxiety disorder, SAD)患者和大学生的正念作用机制及其与社交焦虑的关系,并探讨正念、自我集中注意、成本/概率偏差、回避行为和社交焦虑之间的关系。采用心理测量网络分析对412例SAD患者和367名学生的数据进行分析。两组都完成了自我报告测量,评估了性格正念、自我集中注意力、成本/概率偏差、回避行为和社交焦虑。在性格正念中的不判断与SAD患者网络中的自我关注行为之间存在微弱的负相关。在学生的网络中,观察到不判断和自我关注行为之间,以及描述和社交焦虑之间存在微弱的负相关。在SAD患者网络中,中心性最强的节点为概率偏差和社交焦虑。在学生网络中,中心性最强的节点是社交焦虑和成本偏见。整体网络结构和连通性在SAD患者和学生之间存在差异。研究结果支持了SAD的认知-行为模型,并强调了社交焦虑的异质性,需要有针对性的干预策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信