Inflammatory biomarkers as predictors for unlocking antidepressant efficacy: Assessing predictive value and risk stratification in major depressive disorder in a prospective longitudinal study
Nervana Elbakary , Noriya Al-Khuzaei , Tarteel Hussain , Ahmed Karawia , Malek Smida , Niveen Abu-Rahma , Fairooz Akel , Soad Esmail Mahmoud , James Currie , Mohamed Adil Shah Khoodoruth , Sami Ouanes
{"title":"Inflammatory biomarkers as predictors for unlocking antidepressant efficacy: Assessing predictive value and risk stratification in major depressive disorder in a prospective longitudinal study","authors":"Nervana Elbakary , Noriya Al-Khuzaei , Tarteel Hussain , Ahmed Karawia , Malek Smida , Niveen Abu-Rahma , Fairooz Akel , Soad Esmail Mahmoud , James Currie , Mohamed Adil Shah Khoodoruth , Sami Ouanes","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2025.119545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is characterized by significant heterogeneity in treatment response, with inflammation hypothesized to play a role in its pathophysiology. Peripheral inflammatory biomarkers, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and C-reactive protein (CRP), may predict antidepressant efficacy. This study investigated the association between baseline inflammatory biomarkers, their changes, and antidepressant treatment outcomes in patients with MDD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A prospective longitudinal cohort study in Qatar recruited 123 MDD outpatients (aged 18–64). Baseline assessments included NLR, CRP, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). Depression severity was measured via the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (ZSRS) at baseline and 12 weeks post-treatment. Statistical analyses, including multiple regression and Random Forest machine learning models, identified predictors of antidepressant response.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Improvement in depressive symptoms was associated with female sex, higher mean corpuscular volume (MCV), lower absolute neutrophil count (ANC), and higher eosinophil counts. However, changes in NLR, MLR, PLR, and CRP did not predict treatment response. Folate levels and PLR were identified by the machine learning model as top predictors, suggesting potential utility as biomarkers for response classification. Our study identified predictors of improvement in suicidal ideation, including hematological markers (lower RBC, higher eosinophils, lower monocytes), younger age, female sex, medical comorbidities, and longer assessment intervals.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Baseline ANC and eosinophil count may help stratify MDD treatment outcomes, though post-treatment biomarker changes were not linked to symptom improvement. Our findings highlight suicidality as a distinct pathology within depression, necessitating tailored interventions. This study highlights the complexity of inflammation in depression and suicidality, emphasizing the need for advanced biomarkers utilization in precision medicine and personalized psychiatry treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":"387 ","pages":"Article 119545"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032725009875","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is characterized by significant heterogeneity in treatment response, with inflammation hypothesized to play a role in its pathophysiology. Peripheral inflammatory biomarkers, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and C-reactive protein (CRP), may predict antidepressant efficacy. This study investigated the association between baseline inflammatory biomarkers, their changes, and antidepressant treatment outcomes in patients with MDD.
Methods
A prospective longitudinal cohort study in Qatar recruited 123 MDD outpatients (aged 18–64). Baseline assessments included NLR, CRP, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). Depression severity was measured via the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (ZSRS) at baseline and 12 weeks post-treatment. Statistical analyses, including multiple regression and Random Forest machine learning models, identified predictors of antidepressant response.
Results
Improvement in depressive symptoms was associated with female sex, higher mean corpuscular volume (MCV), lower absolute neutrophil count (ANC), and higher eosinophil counts. However, changes in NLR, MLR, PLR, and CRP did not predict treatment response. Folate levels and PLR were identified by the machine learning model as top predictors, suggesting potential utility as biomarkers for response classification. Our study identified predictors of improvement in suicidal ideation, including hematological markers (lower RBC, higher eosinophils, lower monocytes), younger age, female sex, medical comorbidities, and longer assessment intervals.
Conclusion
Baseline ANC and eosinophil count may help stratify MDD treatment outcomes, though post-treatment biomarker changes were not linked to symptom improvement. Our findings highlight suicidality as a distinct pathology within depression, necessitating tailored interventions. This study highlights the complexity of inflammation in depression and suicidality, emphasizing the need for advanced biomarkers utilization in precision medicine and personalized psychiatry treatment.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.